BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

46 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 65clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka462Delhi384Mumbai237Chennai132Bangalore117Ahmedabad68Hyderabad61Jaipur58Chandigarh56Pune56Kolkata46Lucknow26Indore25Visakhapatnam18Calcutta16Agra14Rajkot13Amritsar13Cuttack11Allahabad10Nagpur10Surat9Cochin9Raipur8Telangana7Varanasi5Patna4Dehradun4Jabalpur3SC3Guwahati2Jodhpur2Rajasthan2Panaji1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 12A39Section 80G36Section 1125Section 14A23Exemption21Section 35(1)(ii)18Deduction17Section 143(1)16Addition to Income16

BALLARAM HANUMANDAS CHARITABLE TRUST,KOLKATA vs. CIT(EXEMPTIONS), KOL., KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of assessee stands allowed

ITA 431/KOL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Sept 2017AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Aby.T Varkey & Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year :2012-13

Section 12ASection 133Section 35(1)(ii)

Charitable Trust Vs. CIT(Ex) Kol. Page 5 ‘Where a trust or an institution has been granted registration under clause (b) of sub-section (1) [or has obtained registration at any time under section 12A [as it stood before its amendment by the Finance (No.2) Act, 1996 (33 of 1996)]] and subsequently the [Principal Commissioner or] Commissioner is satisfied that

ASANSOL DURGAPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,DURGAPUR vs. CIT, DURGAPUR, DURGAPUR

In the result, assessee’s appeal stands allowed

Showing 1–20 of 46 · Page 1 of 3

Disallowance15
Section 1013
Section 143(3)13
ITA 756/KOL/2010[-----------]Status: Disposed
ITAT Kolkata
24 Jun 2016

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Raviasansol Durgapur V/S. Commissioner Of Development Authority Income Tax, 1St Administrative Durgapur, Urmila Building, City Center, Bhawan, City Center Durgapur, West Bengal [Pan No.Aaala 0733G] .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 2(15)

charitable. 4. Facts in brief are that assessee-applicant is a Development Authority constituted u/s. 11 of the West Bengal Town and Country (Planning & Development) Act, 1979 and engaged in the activities of developing the public utilities. The assessee-trust upto including Assessment Year 2003-04 was claiming the exemption u/s. 10(20A) of the Act. However, the Section

JHA EDUCATIONAL TRUST ,KOLKATA vs. ITO(EXEMPTION), WARD - 1(1), KOLKATA , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 320/KOL/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 Nov 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap(Kz) & Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

Section 10Section 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 148Section 80GSection 80G(5)

Charitable Trust is registered i/s. 12A vide M. No. DIT(E)/8E/437/2001-2002 dated 11/04/2002. The assessee runs a school at Baguihati within Kolkata having a primary and junior high school in one campus and a secondary [ICSE] & H.S [ISC] School in another campus. The schools are affiliated with the Council for the Indian School Certificate Examinations from

PATTON INTERNATIONAL LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. PCIT-1, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 261/KOL/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata22 Nov 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2017-18 M/S. Patton International Principal Commissioner Of Ltd., C/O Jain Vinod K & Income-Tax, Kolkata-1. Associates, 41A, A. J. C. Vs Bose Road, Diamond . Prestige Nirman, 6Th Floor, Suite No.613, Kolkata- 700017 (Pan: Aabcp7901M) (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Vinod Kumar Jain, ARFor Respondent: Shri Amitava Bhattacharyya, CIT, DR
Section 143(3)Section 197Section 263Section 40Section 80G

Charitable Trust for which it was alleged that no certificate u/s. 80G and payment proof is found in the assessment record, Ld. Counsel referred to the relevant documents placed in the paper book. 3.2. In respect of Swarnim Foundation, certificate issued by the Commissioner of Income Tax (exemption), Kolkata u/s. 80G(5)(vi) of the Act has given an approval

PRAMOD LAKRA,DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 11(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. PHILLIPS CARBON BLACK LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2457/KOL/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Jun 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey&Shri Sanjay Awasthi]

Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 14ASection 35Section 35(2)(ab)Section 37Section 80GSection 80ISection 92C

65,88,45,310/-. It was processed on 13.11.2019 u/s 143(1) of the Act at total income of Rs. 2,68,05,34,260/-. Further the case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny under complete scrutiny category, a notice u/s 143(2) of the Act was issued. Further approval was obtained from PCIT-1, for referring the case

PRAMOD LAKRA, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 11(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. PHILLIPS CARBON BLACK LTD, KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2456/KOL/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Jun 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey&Shri Sanjay Awasthi]

Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 14ASection 35Section 35(2)(ab)Section 37Section 80GSection 80ISection 92C

65,88,45,310/-. It was processed on 13.11.2019 u/s 143(1) of the Act at total income of Rs. 2,68,05,34,260/-. Further the case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny under complete scrutiny category, a notice u/s 143(2) of the Act was issued. Further approval was obtained from PCIT-1, for referring the case

PRAMOD LAKRA, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-11(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. PHILLIPS CARBON BLACK LTD, KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2458/KOL/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Jun 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey&Shri Sanjay Awasthi]

Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 14ASection 35Section 35(2)(ab)Section 37Section 80GSection 80ISection 92C

65,88,45,310/-. It was processed on 13.11.2019 u/s 143(1) of the Act at total income of Rs. 2,68,05,34,260/-. Further the case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny under complete scrutiny category, a notice u/s 143(2) of the Act was issued. Further approval was obtained from PCIT-1, for referring the case

PRAMOD LAKRA,DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -11(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. PHILIPS CARBON BLACK LTD , KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2459/KOL/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Jun 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey&Shri Sanjay Awasthi]

Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 14ASection 35Section 35(2)(ab)Section 37Section 80GSection 80ISection 92C

65,88,45,310/-. It was processed on 13.11.2019 u/s 143(1) of the Act at total income of Rs. 2,68,05,34,260/-. Further the case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny under complete scrutiny category, a notice u/s 143(2) of the Act was issued. Further approval was obtained from PCIT-1, for referring the case

PCBL LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. A.C.I.T., CIRCLE - 11(1),, KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2034/KOL/2024[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Jun 2025AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey&Shri Sanjay Awasthi]

Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 14ASection 35Section 35(2)(ab)Section 37Section 80GSection 80ISection 92C

65,88,45,310/-. It was processed on 13.11.2019 u/s 143(1) of the Act at total income of Rs. 2,68,05,34,260/-. Further the case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny under complete scrutiny category, a notice u/s 143(2) of the Act was issued. Further approval was obtained from PCIT-1, for referring the case

ITO(EXEMPTION),WARD-1(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. SURESH AMIYA MEMORIAL TRUST, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 652/KOL/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Nov 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Rakesh Mishraassessment Year: 2020-21

For Appellant: Shri Kaustav Chakraborty &For Respondent: Shri Arup Chatterjee, CIT DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 12A(1)Section 12A(1)(b)Section 143(1)Section 250Section 44A

Section 11 of the Act to the assessee Suresh Amiya Memorial, Trust; A.Y. 2020-21 as claimed in the income tax return. Accordingly, the effective grounds raised by the assessee are allowed.” 7. Further, in the case of CIT vs. Rai Bahadur Bissesswarlal Motilal Malwasie Trust (1992) 65 Taxman 273 (CAL) it has been held as under: “7. Admittedly

NIR IDEAL HOME FOR MENTALLY RETARDED AND ASSOCIATED DISABILITY,HAROA vs. ITO, WARD 1(1), EXEMPT, , KOLKATA

Accordingly the grounds raised by the appellant in this regard are dismissed”

ITA 1376/KOL/2025[2022-2023]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata30 Oct 2025AY 2022-2023

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Vice-(Kz) I.T.A. No. 1376/Kol/2025 Assessment Year: 2022-2023 Nir Ideal Home For Mentally Retarded & Associated Disability,………………..……Appellant Vill. Pilkhana, Haroa, North 24-Parganas-743425, West Bengal [Pan:Aaaan3642G] -Vs.- Income Tax Officer,……………………………....Respondent Ward-1(1), Exemption, Kolkata, (Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department), Income Tax Building, 10B, Middleton Row, Kolkata-700071 Appearances By: Shri Arvind Agrawal, A.R., Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri Mrinmay Basak, Sr. D.R., Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing: August 28, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order: October 30, 2025 O R D E R

Section 115BSection 143(2)Section 80G

65,436/- should not be treated as violation of section 115BBC as the Trust comes under the exceptional category of it. The appellant vide its reply self-proclaimed itself as a mixed purpose Trust, i.e. the Trust objects should be for both religious and charitable

SUBHAS HARILAL DOSHI CHARITABLE TRUST,KOLKATA vs. CIT(EXEMPTIONS), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, assessee’s appeal stands allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 566/KOL/2016[]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 Oct 2016

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri K.Narsimha Charysubhas Harilal Doshi बनाम Cit(Exemp.) Kolkata Charitable Trust, C/O. 10, Middleton Row, / V/S. S.L. Kochar, Advocate, Kolkata 86, Canning Street, Kolkata-700 001 [Pan No.Aaets 1899 P] .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ" /Respondent

Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(3)Section 132Section 132(4)Section 147Section 148

65,00,000 Subhas Harlal Doshi Charitable Trust vs. CIT (E) Kol. Page 3 There was a person who was acting as a conduit between the donors, PCEC and KLES. The name of the person acting as conduit was Shri J.K. Jain resident of 18, R.N. Mukherjee Road, Kolkata- 700001. All the above facts were admitted by the Director

DCIT EXEMPTIONS CIRCLE 1(1), KOLKATA vs. B P PODDAR FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the revenue stands dismissed

ITA 637/KOL/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata23 Jun 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Sanjay Awasthiआयकर अपील सं /Ita No.637/Kol/2025 (निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Year. : 2022-2023) Dcit Exemptions Circle-1(1), Vs B P Poddar Foundation For Education, Kolkata 18, Poddar Court, Rabindra Sarani, Kolkata-700071 Pan No. :Aaatb 5418 M (अपीलधर्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Raja Sengupta, Cit-Dr निर्धाररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri S.K.Tulsiayn, Advocate सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 18/06/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 23/06/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per George Mathan, Jm : This Is An Appeal Filed By The Revenue Against The Order Dated 23.12.2024, Passed By The Ld. Addl./Jcit(A)-9, Mumbai For A.Y.2022- 2023. 2. Shri Raja Sengupta, Cit-Dr Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue & Shri S.K.Tulsiyan, Advocate Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee. 3. The Appeal Filed By The Revenue Is Delayed By 26 Days For Which The Revenue Has Filed The Necessary Condonation Petition. The Reasons Given Are Plausible & Same Are Accepted. Accordingly, The Delay Is Condoned & The Appeal Is Admitted For Hearing. 4. At The Time Of Hearing, Ld.Ar Has Filed His Written Submission Which Read As Under :- Before The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata "A" Bench. Kolkata.

For Appellant: Shri S.K.Tulsiayn, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Raja Sengupta, CIT-DR
Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)

Charitable Trust. For the year under appeal being the A.Y. 2022-23, the trust also obtained provisional approval under section 10(23C)(via) vide Form 10AC dated 30/09/2021 for A.V.s 2022-23 to 2024-25. 2.2. The Assesee-Trust for the said A.Y.2022-23 filed its ROI on 04/11/2022 but while preparing its Income Tax Return and the related documents

DREAMLAND EDUCATION SOCIETY,HOOGHLY vs. ACIT, CIR-2, HOOGHLY, HOOGHLY

In the result the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 489/KOL/2016[2005-2006]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Aug 2016AY 2005-2006

Bench: Hon’Ble Sri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Dr.Arjun Lal Saini, Am] I.T.A Nos. 489-495/Kol/2016 Assessment Years : 2005-06 To 2011-12

For Appellant: Shri S.K.Tulsiyan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri G.Mallikarjuna, CIT(DR)
Section 11Section 12ASection 12A(2)Section 148Section 148(1)Section 249(4)

Trust, Society, Individual, Partnership firm or company. Here in the case of Dreamland Educational Society which derives excess of income over expenditure should reasonably be considered income under the head -' Income From Other Sources' under section 2(24(iia) read with section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act.” 6 7 ITA Nos.489-495/Kol/2016 Dreamland Education Society A.Yrs

M/S. MOHANLAL MAHENDRA KUMAR PATNI CHARITABLE TRUST,KOLKATA vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1463/KOL/2017[--------------]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata04 Jul 2018

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Aby. T. Varkey, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am ] I.T.A No. 1463/Kol/2017 Assessment Years : 2016-17 M/S Mohanlal Mahendra Kumar Patni. -Vs- Cit(E), Kolkata [Pan: Aaatm 8500 F ] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri S. M. Surana, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.K. Tiwari, CIT
Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(vi)

charitable trust or is registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 (21 of 1860), or under any law corresponding to that Act in force in any part of India or under section 2561 of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956), or is a University established by law, or is any other educational institution recognised by the Government

ITO, (E) -II, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. DEBI KAMAL ESTATE TRUST, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue on ground No

ITA 862/KOL/2013[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Apr 2017AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi, Jm & Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.862/Kol/2013 ("नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year:2004-05) Ito(E)-Ii Vs. Debi Kamal Estate Trust, Kolkata 5Th , 10B, 7, Queens Park, Middleton Row, Kolkata-700020 Kolkata-700071 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaatd 7600 F .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Animesh Mukherjee, FCA &For Respondent: Shri R.P.Nag, JCIT, Sr.DR
Section 11Section 11(2)Section 143(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148

Section 144/147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) dated, 09.07.2009 2 Co.No.68/Kol/2013 Debi Kamal Estate Trust 2. Brief facts of the case qua the assessee are that the assessee filed its return of income for assessment year 2004-05 on dated 31.03.2005 declaring total income at Nil. The Return of income

PANCHAJANYA TRUST,KOLKATA vs. ITO, (EXEMPTION), WARD-1(4), KOKLATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is allowed and the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1841/KOL/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata01 Oct 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.1841/Kol/2017 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2014-15)

For Appellant: Shri S.K. Das, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Robin Chowdhury, DR
Section 11Section 11(1)(d)Section 12(1)Section 143(3)

65,78,861/- ( Rs. 6,14,48,893-Rs. 4,48,70,032), as follows: (i) Rs. 39,58,981/- as Surplus of Income over Expenditure. (ii). Rs 1,00,00,000/-, collected as Re-Admission Fees. (iii).Rs 21,70,700/-Term charges. (iv).Rs. 4,49,180/-, Admission fees Totaling Rs.1

ITO(E), WD-1(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. PANCHAJANYA TRUST, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is allowed and the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1994/KOL/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata01 Oct 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.1841/Kol/2017 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2014-15)

For Appellant: Shri S.K. Das, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Robin Chowdhury, DR
Section 11Section 11(1)(d)Section 12(1)Section 143(3)

65,78,861/- ( Rs. 6,14,48,893-Rs. 4,48,70,032), as follows: (i) Rs. 39,58,981/- as Surplus of Income over Expenditure. (ii). Rs 1,00,00,000/-, collected as Re-Admission Fees. (iii).Rs 21,70,700/-Term charges. (iv).Rs. 4,49,180/-, Admission fees Totaling Rs.1

ITO(EXMP), WD -2(1), DURGAPUR, DURGAPUR vs. M/S GURUKUL EDUCATION INSTITUTE, DURGAPUR

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 1369/KOL/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata14 Feb 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, V.P & Shri S. S. Godara, Jm आयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A No.1369/Kol/2016 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2010-11) Ito (Exemptions), Ward-2(1), Vs. M/S. Gurukul Educational Institute Durgapur G.T. Road, Rajbandh, Durgapur-713212. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaatg7615B (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellant By : Smt. Ranu Biswas, Sr. Dr Respondent By : Shri Anikesh Banerjee & Shri Anupam Kr. Dey, Advocate सुनवाई क" तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 09/12/2019 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 14/02/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Shri S. S. Godara: This Revenue’S Appeal For Assessment Year 2010-11 Arises Against The Commissioner Of Income Tax (A)-Durgapur’S Order Dated 28.03.2016 Passed In Case No.90/Cit(A)/Dgp/2013-14 Involving Proceedings U/S 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961; In Short ‘The Act’. Heard Both The Parties. Case File Perused.

For Appellant: Smt. Ranu Biswas, Sr. DRFor Respondent: Shri Anikesh Banerjee, & Shri Anupam Kr. Dey, Advocate
Section 11Section 13Section 13(1)(c)Section 143(3)Section 250(4)Section 40A(2)

65,10,525/- under the head Advertisement & Publicity and question the necessity of such expenses and show caused the trust to treat it as business entity and thereby forfeiting the exemption u/s 11 of the said Act. During the appellate proceedings the appellant has made elaborate written submission and has filed a detailed computation of the income of the trust

M/S INTEGRATED EDUCATION RESEARCH CENTRE FOR ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT,KOLKATA vs. CIT(EXEMPTIONS), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result the appeal is allowed while the stay application is dismissed

ITA 620/KOL/2016[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata01 Jun 2016AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri M.Balaganesh

For Appellant: Mr.S.M.Surana, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr.Snehotpal Datta, JCIT
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 32Section 35(2)(iv)

Charitable Trust (supra) were neither referred to nor discussed. Further, although the name of Escorts Ltd. (supra) was mentioned in the list of cases referred to, not a single line of discussion was made on this case in the body of the order. The detail of the order of the Apex Court was not brought to the attention