I.T.O(E)-II, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. FUTURE EDUCATION RESCARCH TRUST., KOLKATA

In the result, assessee’s CO is dismissed as infructuous

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi & C.O.No.69/Kol/2013 (A/O Ita No.1031/Kol/2013) Assessment Year:2009-10

249 ITR 533. The relevant extract of the order is reproduced below : “6. Sec. 164 does not create a charge on the income of a discretionary trust. The word ‘charge’ in s. 164 means ‘levy’. Sec. 164(2) refers to the relevant income which is derived from property held under trust wholly for charitable or religious purposes. If such income

KOLKATA METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,KOLKATA vs. J.C.I.T RANGE - 50,KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri A.T. Varkey, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am ] I.T.A Nos. 723 & 724/Kol/2013 Assessment Years : 2006-07 & 2007-08 Kolkata Metropolitan Development Authority -Vs- C.I.T.-Xvii, Kolkata [Pan: Aaalk 0714 F] (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A Nos. 523 & 524/Kol/2013 Assessment Years : 2006-07 & 2007-08 Kolkata Metropolitan Development Authority -Vs- J.C.I.T., Kolkata [Pan: Aaalk 0714 F] (Appellant) (Respondent) For The Appellant : Shri J.P. Khaitan, Sr. Counsel Of Assessee For The Respondent : Shri Anand R. Baiwar, Cit Date Of Hearing : 09.08.2017 Date Of Pronouncement : 18.08.2017

4. The assessee had raised the following grounds of appeal for the Asst Year 2006-07 in ITA No. 523/Kol/2015 :- l. That the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-15, Kolkata erred in arbitrarily and wrongly upholding the impugned Assessment Order dated 25th February, 2014 passed by the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range - 50, Kolkata under section

KOLKATA METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,KOLKATA vs. J.C.I.T RANGE - 50,KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri A.T. Varkey, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am ] I.T.A Nos. 723 & 724/Kol/2013 Assessment Years : 2006-07 & 2007-08 Kolkata Metropolitan Development Authority -Vs- C.I.T.-Xvii, Kolkata [Pan: Aaalk 0714 F] (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A Nos. 523 & 524/Kol/2013 Assessment Years : 2006-07 & 2007-08 Kolkata Metropolitan Development Authority -Vs- J.C.I.T., Kolkata [Pan: Aaalk 0714 F] (Appellant) (Respondent) For The Appellant : Shri J.P. Khaitan, Sr. Counsel Of Assessee For The Respondent : Shri Anand R. Baiwar, Cit Date Of Hearing : 09.08.2017 Date Of Pronouncement : 18.08.2017

4. The assessee had raised the following grounds of appeal for the Asst Year 2006-07 in ITA No. 523/Kol/2015 :- l. That the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-15, Kolkata erred in arbitrarily and wrongly upholding the impugned Assessment Order dated 25th February, 2014 passed by the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range - 50, Kolkata under section

SASHA ASSOCIATION FOR CRAFT PRODUCERS,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 1(3), EXEMPTION, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

249 of the Act, which provides power to the Id. Commissioner to condone the delay in filing of the appeal before the Commissioner. Similarly, it has been used in Section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1963. Whenever interpretation and consideration of this expression has fallen for consideration before the Hon'ble High Courts as well as before

SASHA ASSOCIATION FOR CRAFT PRODUCERS,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 1(3), EXEMPTION, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

249 of the Act, which provides power to the Id. Commissioner to condone the delay in filing of the appeal before the Commissioner. Similarly, it has been used in Section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1963. Whenever interpretation and consideration of this expression has fallen for consideration before the Hon'ble High Courts as well as before

SASHA ASSOCIATION FOR CRAFT PRODUCERS,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 1(3), EXEMPTION, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

249 of the Act, which provides power to the Id. Commissioner to condone the delay in filing of the appeal before the Commissioner. Similarly, it has been used in Section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1963. Whenever interpretation and consideration of this expression has fallen for consideration before the Hon'ble High Courts as well as before

KALYAN BRATA SANGHA,KOLKATA vs. CIT(EXEMPTIONS), KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Boradi.T.A. Nos. 393 & 394/Kol/2024 Kalyan Brata Sangha,….………………………Appellant Brindabanpur, Police Station Uluberia, Howrah-711316, West Bengal [Pan:Aaatk5379E] -Vs.- Commissioner Of Income Tax(Exemption),..Respondent Kolkata, 10B, Middleton Row (6Th Floor), Kolkata-700071 Appearances By: Shri P.K. Ray, A.R., Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri A. Kundu, Cit, D.R. Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing: May 15, 2024 Date Of Pronouncing The Order: July 04, 2024 O R D E R

249 of Income Tax Act, which provides powers to the ld. Commissioner to condone the delay in filing the appeal before the Commissioner. Similarly, it has been used in section 5 of Indian Limitation Act, 1963. Whenever interpretation and construction of this expression has fallen for consideration before Honble High Court as well as before the Honble Supreme Court, then

KALYAN BRATA SANGHA,HOWRAH vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Boradi.T.A. Nos. 393 & 394/Kol/2024 Kalyan Brata Sangha,….………………………Appellant Brindabanpur, Police Station Uluberia, Howrah-711316, West Bengal [Pan:Aaatk5379E] -Vs.- Commissioner Of Income Tax(Exemption),..Respondent Kolkata, 10B, Middleton Row (6Th Floor), Kolkata-700071 Appearances By: Shri P.K. Ray, A.R., Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri A. Kundu, Cit, D.R. Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing: May 15, 2024 Date Of Pronouncing The Order: July 04, 2024 O R D E R

249 of Income Tax Act, which provides powers to the ld. Commissioner to condone the delay in filing the appeal before the Commissioner. Similarly, it has been used in section 5 of Indian Limitation Act, 1963. Whenever interpretation and construction of this expression has fallen for consideration before Honble High Court as well as before the Honble Supreme Court, then

M/S BENGAL SHRISTI INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT LIMITED,DURGAPUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2, DURGAPUR, DURGAPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed in part

4. The ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that all the evidences in question were furnished before the Assessing Officer as well as the ld. CIT(A) and that the ld. CIT(A) had called for a remand report and that the Assessing Officer finally rested his objections only on three aspects. The arguments of the ld. A/R are summarized

SEVA BHARATI,BANKURA vs. CIT(E), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Trust is that the erstwhile Secretary Shri Mohan Chatterjee, aged about 78 years is unable to move his arms due to old age and unable to checked the departmental communication in time and lack of communication with him due to his old age as well as not accustomed to use e- mail and other electronic devices, the appeal could

LUDLOW JUTE COMPANY LIMITED PROVIDENT FUND,KOLKATA vs. A.D.I.T., CPC, BENGALURU, BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 249 of the L.T. Act. 5.0 In this context, reference is made to the decision of the Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of Sreenivas Charitable Trust-vs-DCIT (2006) 280 ITR 357 (Mad), The brief facts of the case are that aggrieved by the order of CIT(Appeals), the assessee preferred” 5. The Bench