BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 220clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka426Delhi140Mumbai66Bangalore52Hyderabad39Pune25Chennai24Lucknow22Cochin22Ahmedabad20Calcutta16Jaipur8Chandigarh8Kolkata6Kerala5Indore4Cuttack4Patna4Amritsar3Rajasthan3Telangana3Panaji2Jodhpur2Varanasi1Andhra Pradesh1Nagpur1Raipur1Rajkot1SC1

Key Topics

Section 12A10Section 117Section 14A6Section 1545Section 234E5Section 143(3)4Section 104Exemption3Section 11(1)(a)2Addition to Income

DCIT(EXAMPTION), CIRCLE - 1(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. MAA SARASWATI GYAN MANDIR EDUCATION SOCIETY , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 2002/KOL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Jan 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri A.T. Varkey, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.2002/Kol/2017 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2012-13) Dcit(Exemption), Circle- Vs. Maa Saraswati Gyan Mandir 1(1), Kolkata

For Appellant: Shri Radhey Shyam, CITFor Respondent: Shri S. M. Surana, Advocate
Section 11Section 11(1)Section 11(1)(a)Section 11(1)(d)Section 143(3)

trust. The AO was of the view that, administrative & establishment expenses being attributable to earning income are deductible from gross receipt to determine the net income available for application for charitable purposes for the purpose of calculation of allowable accumulation of 15% under section 11(l)(a) of the Act. Therefore, AO held that following expenses were neither directly

2
Capital Gains2
Long Term Capital Gains2

KALIYAGANJ REGULATED MARKET COMMITTEE,UTTAR DINAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD - 1, RAIGANJ, UTTAR DINAJPUR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 648/KOL/2011[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata06 Apr 2016AY 2003-04

Bench: : Shri N.V.Vasudevan & Shri M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: S/Sh. Balchand Agarwal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Mukherjee, JCIT, ld.Sr.DR
Section 10Section 11Section 11(2)Section 12ASection 139(1)Section 143(3)

Trust vs CIT reported in 141 TTJ 220 (CTK) which was rendered for Asst Year 2007-08 on the similar set of facts. 4.2. In response to this, the Learned DR argued that section 20 of The West Bengal Agriculture Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1972 which is part of the paper book filed by the assessee stipulates that

ROTARY PRESIDENCY FOUNDATION,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD-1(1) EXEMPT., KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed as indicated above

ITA 450/KOL/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata18 Feb 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

Section 11oSection 12ASection 143(1)Section 154

charitable activities during the year. As per the order u/s. 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), the assessee’s return was processed by the CPC and by order dated 23.01.2018 the assessee’s total income was assessed at Rs.7,06,033/- and net tax liability thus created was to the tune

SUSHIL KUMAR BERLIA,SILIGURI vs. I.T.O., TDS, WARD - 5(2), SILIGURI

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed

ITA 1773/KOL/2024[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 Nov 2024AY 2013-2014

Bench: Sri Rajesh Kumar & Pradip Kumar Choubey

Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 201ASection 220(2)Section 220ASection 234ESection 250

220(2) of the Act on default amount comes to Rs. 41,912/- has also been imposed and asked the assessee to pay an amount of Rs. 75,790/-. The said order has been challenged by the assessee before the Ld. CIT(A) wherein also the appeal of the assessee has been dismissed. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned

AVIS TIE UP PVT LTD,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T CIR - 11,KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 2028/KOL/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Jul 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14A

220/- for the year under consideration. Thereafter case was selected for scrutiny and notice issued u/s 143(2) of the Act was issued. The assessee, during the year earned tax exempted income in the form of dividend income of ₹16,00,385/- and Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG for short) of ₹60,47,303/-. The AO during the course

AVIS TIE UP PVT LTD,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T CIR - 11,KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 2029/KOL/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Jul 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14A

220/- for the year under consideration. Thereafter case was selected for scrutiny and notice issued u/s 143(2) of the Act was issued. The assessee, during the year earned tax exempted income in the form of dividend income of ₹16,00,385/- and Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG for short) of ₹60,47,303/-. The AO during the course