BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

10 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 197(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka448Delhi159Mumbai46Hyderabad46Bangalore33Jaipur28Cochin27Chandigarh19Chennai18Lucknow18Calcutta17Pune11Ahmedabad11Kolkata10Varanasi4Cuttack4Jodhpur3Allahabad3Telangana3Orissa2Rajasthan2Indore2Amritsar1Rajkot1SC1Surat1Visakhapatnam1Andhra Pradesh1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 80G13Section 1113Section 143(1)9Section 1478Section 148Section 2637Section 12A7Section 143(3)6TDS6Exemption

M/S. SETH B D GOYAL CHARITABLE TRUST,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O. WARD - 1(3), EXEMPTION, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2267/KOL/2024[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata04 Apr 2025AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 11Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 250

Charitable Trust. 2. The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal raising the following grounds of appeal: “1 For that the Ld. CIT(A) erred in not condoning the delay in filing the appeal even when reasonable cause for not filing the appeal within time was duly explained. 2. For that the Ld. CIT(A) erred in confirming the action

M/S PEERLESS HOSPITEX HOSPITAL AND RESERCH CENTRE LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WD-11(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

6
Deduction4
Charitable Trust3
ITA 1107/KOL/2014[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata11 Jul 2018AY 2009-2010

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Aby. T. Varkey, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am ] I.T.A No. 1107/Kol/2014 Assessment Years : 2009-10 M/S Peerless Hospitex Hospital & Research Centre Ltd. -Vs- Ito, Ward-11(1), Kolkata [Pan: Aabcp 7225 L ] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Adv. (AR)For Respondent: Shri P. K. Srihari, CIT(DR)
Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 197(1)Section 40

section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”) dated 28.12.2011 for the Assessment Year 2009-10. 2. The only issue to be decided in this appeal is as to whether the ld CITA was justified in upholding the disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act in the facts and circumstances of the case

PATTON INTERNATIONAL LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. PCIT-1, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 261/KOL/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata22 Nov 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2017-18 M/S. Patton International Principal Commissioner Of Ltd., C/O Jain Vinod K & Income-Tax, Kolkata-1. Associates, 41A, A. J. C. Vs Bose Road, Diamond . Prestige Nirman, 6Th Floor, Suite No.613, Kolkata- 700017 (Pan: Aabcp7901M) (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Vinod Kumar Jain, ARFor Respondent: Shri Amitava Bhattacharyya, CIT, DR
Section 143(3)Section 197Section 263Section 40Section 80G

1) dated 24.03.2022 against the assessment order by the ACIT, Circle-8(2), Kolkata u/s. 143(3) of the Act, dated 30.11.2019. 2. Instant appeal relates to assumption of jurisdiction by the Ld. Pr. CIT by invoking the provisions of section 263 of the Act and passing the impugned order under the said section. There are three issues raised

DCIT, CIR-1, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. INDIAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, KOLKATA

In the result, both appeals of assessee are allowed

ITA 415/KOL/2016[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata03 Aug 2016AY 2010-2011

Bench: : Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

For Appellant: Shri Ravi Tulsiyan, FCA, ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Sellong Yaden, Addl CIT, ld.DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 13Section 143(3)Section 2(15)

197 of 2514-15 for the assessment years 2010-11 & 2011-12 respectively both assessment orders framed by the AO u/s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’). 2. The revenue has raised the following common grounds: 1. That on the facts and circumstances of the case the CIT(A) has erred

ITO (EXEMPTION), WARD - 1(1), KOLKATA , KOLKATA vs. M/S. GOPSAI AVINANDAN SANGHA, PASCHIM MIDNAPORE

ITA 8/KOL/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata17 Jan 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 11Section 11(1)Section 11(1)(d)Section 12ASection 14Section 147Section 2(45)

trust wholly for charitable or religious purposes to the extent it is applied for such purposes .... " shall not be included in the total income. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Gangabai Charities vs, CIT [1992] 197 ITR 416 (SC) has upheld the aforesaid interpretation as under:- "the crux of statutory exemption under section 11 (1

ITO (EXEMPTION), WARD - 1(1), KOLKATA , KOLKATA vs. M/S. GOPSAI AVINANDAN SANGHA, PASCHIM MIDNAPORE

ITA 10/KOL/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata17 Jan 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 11Section 11(1)Section 11(1)(d)Section 12ASection 14Section 147Section 2(45)

trust wholly for charitable or religious purposes to the extent it is applied for such purposes .... " shall not be included in the total income. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Gangabai Charities vs, CIT [1992] 197 ITR 416 (SC) has upheld the aforesaid interpretation as under:- "the crux of statutory exemption under section 11 (1

ITO (EXEMPTION), WARD - 1(1), KOLKATA , KOLKATA vs. M/S. GOPSAI AVINANDAN SANGHA, PASCHIM MIDNAPORE

ITA 9/KOL/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata17 Jan 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 11Section 11(1)Section 11(1)(d)Section 12ASection 14Section 147Section 2(45)

trust wholly for charitable or religious purposes to the extent it is applied for such purposes .... " shall not be included in the total income. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Gangabai Charities vs, CIT [1992] 197 ITR 416 (SC) has upheld the aforesaid interpretation as under:- "the crux of statutory exemption under section 11 (1

ITO (EXEMPTION), WARD - 1(1), KOLKATA , KOLKATA vs. M/S. GOPSAI AVINANDAN SANGHA, PASCHIM MIDNAPORE

ITA 11/KOL/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata17 Jan 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 11Section 11(1)Section 11(1)(d)Section 12ASection 14Section 147Section 2(45)

trust wholly for charitable or religious purposes to the extent it is applied for such purposes .... " shall not be included in the total income. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Gangabai Charities vs, CIT [1992] 197 ITR 416 (SC) has upheld the aforesaid interpretation as under:- "the crux of statutory exemption under section 11 (1

SREEMA MAHILA SAMITY,NADIA vs. D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-NADIA, NADIA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 2826/KOL/2013[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Oct 2017AY 2009-2010
For Appellant: S/Shri K.M. Roy &For Respondent: Shri Sallong Yaden, Addl.CIT, ld.Sr.DR
Section 12ASection 143(2)Section 2

1) DISHA INDIA MICRO CREDIT V. CIT- January 28, 2011 (ITAT - DEL) Section 2 (15) read with section 12A/12AA of the Income Tax Act 1961 - Charitable purpose. Activities of Promoting Micro Finance Services as permitted from time to time by the Reserve Bank of India, exclusively to large number of poor persons in their villages, towns etc. for income generation

DIAMOND BEVERAGES PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. PCIT-2, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 208/KOL/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata06 Jul 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 208/Kol/2022 Assessment Year: 2017-18 Diamond Beverages Private Limited Pr. Cit, Kolkata - 2 P-41, Taratala Road Vs Taratala Kolkata – 700 088 Pan : Aabcd3346C अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : S. Agarwal, Aca Revenue By : Md. Ghayas Uddin, Cit, D/R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 06/07/2022 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 06/07/2022 आदेश/O R D E R Per Shri Rajpal Yadav:

For Appellant: S. Agarwal, ACAFor Respondent: Md. Ghayas Uddin, CIT, D/R
Section 143Section 143(2)Section 263Section 263(1)Section 37Section 80G

trust or institution approved under 80G. Only donation out of CSR expenses made to Swachh BharatKosh and Clean Ganga Fund are not allowable u/s 80G. As such it cannot be said that the above view is erroneous and there is a possible view that the expenditure which has been disallowed under sec 37 of the Act can be claimed