BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 196clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka428Delhi141Mumbai70Bangalore30Jaipur23Cuttack19Lucknow18Chandigarh16Calcutta16Chennai15Ahmedabad12Pune6Hyderabad6Surat5Visakhapatnam5Kolkata5Agra4Telangana4Amritsar3Jodhpur3Rajasthan2Indore2Rajkot2SC2Andhra Pradesh2Patna1Punjab & Haryana1Jabalpur1Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 12A9Section 11(5)9Section 54F6Section 80G(5)(vi)5Section 143(1)4Charitable Trust4Exemption4Section 403Section 13(2)(a)3

SURAJ DEVI MOHTA CHARITABLE TRUST,KOLKATA vs. DIT-EXEMPTION, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee, is allowed

ITA 2023/KOL/2014[]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata25 Sept 2017

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.2023/Kol/2014 Suraj Devi Mohta Charitable Vs. D.I.T.(Exemption), Kolkata Trust 10B, Middleton Row, 6Th 7, Lyons Range, 2Nd Floor, Room Floor, Kolkata – 700 071. No.4C, Kolkata – 700 001. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaets3384 F (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellantby :Shri P. J. Bhide, Fca Respondent By :Shri G. Hangshing, Cit(Dr) सुनवाईकीतारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 06/09/2017 घोषणाकीतारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 25/09/2017 आदेश / O R D E R Per Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Am: The Captioned Appeal Filed By The Assessee, Is Directed Against An Order Passed By The Director Of Income Tax (Exemption), Kolkata Dated 06.08.2014. 2.This Appeal Is Time-Barred By 21 Days. The Assessee Moved An Application For Condonation Of Delay In Filing The Appeal. Having Heard The Petition Of Condonation Of Delay, We Find That There Was Sufficient Reason For Not Filing The Appeal Within The Time Limit, Before The Itat. Therefore, We Condone The Delay & Admit The Appeal For Hearing. 3. The Grounds Of Appeal Raised By The Assessee Are As Under: “1.That On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case, The Ld. Director Of Income Tax(Exemption), Kolkata Erred In Rejecting The Application For Renewal Of Exemption U/S 80G(5)(Vi) Of The I.T. Act, 1961 On The Ground That The Loan Given To Mrs. Shrutimohta, Wife Of One Of The Trustees, Shri

For Appellant: Shri P. J. Bhide, FCAFor Respondent: Shri G. Hangshing, CIT(DR)
Section 11Section 11(5)
Section 194I3
Deduction3
TDS2
Section 13
Section 13(2)(a)
Section 80G(5)(vi)

section 11(5) of the Act.The ld Counsel pointed out that merely because the assessee trust has allowed the loan to the wife of one of the Trustees,the assessee trust should not be denied for exemption u/s 80G(5)(vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 because the loan was fully secured and bearing interest rate of 12% which

M/S MCC PTA INDIA CORPN. PVT. LTD.,PURBA MEDINIPUR vs. ACIT, CIR-59, TDS, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals filed by the Assessee are allowed

ITA 151/KOL/2016[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata18 Jul 2018AY 2011-2012
Section 11Section 194Section 194ISection 201(1)

charitable institution under the provisions of the Act, it cannot be disputed that the income of Kolkata Port Trust is not chargeable to tax under the provisions of the Act. Section 11 under which Kolkata Port Trust was assessed, inter alia, for the assessment year 2007-08 falls under Chapter III of the Act for “incomes which do not form

MARTIN BURN LTD,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O WD - 4(2),KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1914/KOL/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Jul 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 40

charitable institution under the provisions of the Act, it cannot be disputed that the income of Kolkata Port Trust is not chargeable to tax under the provisions of the Act. Section 11 under which Kolkata Port Trust was assessed, inter alia, for the assessment year 2007-08 falls under Chapter III of the Act for “incomes which do not form

SMITA S MEHTA,KOLKATA vs. ASST DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 599/KOL/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 Nov 2024AY 2021-22

Bench: Sri Rajesh Kumar & Pradip Kumar Choubey

Section 143Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 154Section 250Section 54F

196 ITR 55, a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court held that (at page 71): "This is because the scope of the powers to make prima facie adjustments under Section 143(1 )(a) is somewhat coterminous with the power to rectify a mistake apparent from the record under Section 154..., In its literal sense, 'prima facie' means

M/S D. S. HEALTH & EDUCATION TRUST,KOLKATA vs. CIT(EXEMPTIONS), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, assessee’s appeal stands allowed

ITA 1209/KOL/2016[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata14 Feb 2018AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri N.V.Vasudevan & Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year :2011-12

Section 12ASection 133A

196 I; (iv) that the accounts itself reveal that the said donation had not returned either in cash or through web of financial transactions after retaining commission as alleged in the so called deposition made under the oath by one Shri S.R. Dasgupta, Director of an assessee "M/s. Herbicure HeaIthcare Bio-Herbal Research Foundation" and returned in the course