BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 194Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Cochin22Karnataka21Mumbai15Delhi11Kerala5Chennai4Lucknow4Kolkata4Ahmedabad3Bangalore3Indore3Jaipur3Rajasthan2Surat2Rajkot1Telangana1Visakhapatnam1

Key Topics

Section 406Section 115Section 12A4Section 143(3)3Section 194I3Section 194C3TDS3Addition to Income3Deduction3Disallowance

M/S MCC PTA INDIA CORPN. PVT. LTD.,PURBA MEDINIPUR vs. ACIT, CIR-59, TDS, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals filed by the Assessee are allowed

ITA 151/KOL/2016[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata18 Jul 2018AY 2011-2012
Section 11Section 194Section 194ISection 201(1)

charitable trust and no TDS is liable to be deducted at source by the assessee and the additional ground raised by the assessee is allowed. 11.Further, the Ld.AR submits that, whether the wharfage charges paid by the assessee is in the nature of rent for use of dock in the “KPT”. In this connection, he refers to the facts relating

PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASES ACADEMY,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD - 31(2), KOLKATA , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2355/KOL/2017[2013-14]Status: Disposed
3
Section 201(1)2
Section 2(15)2
ITAT Kolkata
24 May 2018
AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Am] I.T.A. No. 2355/Kol/2017 Assessment Year: 2013-14 Pediatric Infectious Diseases Academy...............................…………………………Appellant Oriental Apartments, Flat No. H-1, 15C, Canal Street, Moulali, Kolkata – 700 014. [Pan: Aacap 0458 J] I.T.O. Ward 31(2) Kolkata...................……………………………………………...........Respondent 10, Middleton Row, Kolkata – 700 071. Appearances By: Shri Sandeep Vimal, Fca & Shri Ritesh Vimal, Fca Appearing On Behalf Of The Assessee. Shri Alok Nag, Addl. Cit Appearing On Behalf Of The Revenue. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : April 9, 2018 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : May 24 , 2018 Order This Appeal Filed By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Of Ld. Cit(Appeals) – 9, Kolkata Dated 09.08.2016 & The Solitary Issue Involved Therein Relates To The Disallowance Of Rs. 41,59,000/- Made By The A.O. & Confirmed By The Ld. Cit(A) U/S 40(A)(Ia) For Non- Deduction Of Tax At Source From The Payment Of Printing Charges.

Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 194CSection 2(15)Section 40

194C were liable to be disallowed u/s 40(a)(ia). He accordingly made a disallowance to that extent in the assessment completed u/s 143(3) vide an order dated 15.03.2016. 3. Against the order passed by the A.O. under section 143(3), an appeal was preferred by the assessee before the Ld. CIT(A). During the course of appellate proceedings

DR. B.G. MEMORIAL TRUST,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD-1(2), EXEMPTION, KOLKATA

The appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 680/KOL/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Sept 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Sanjay Awasthii.T.A. No.680/Kol/2024 Assessment Year: 2013-14 Dr. B. G. Memorial Trust..…….…....…………….......…....………....Appellant 6/1, Sarat Chatterjee Avenue Rabindra Sarovar, Kolkata – 700029. [Pan: Aaatd5235A] Vs. Ito, Ward-1(2), Exempt, Kolkata...........................................…..…..... Respondent Appearances By: Shri S. M. Surana, Ar & Sunil Surana, Ar, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Manas Mondal, Addl. Cit, Sr. Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : June 27, 2024 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : September 13, 2024 आदेश / Order संजय गग", "या"यक सद"य "वारा / Per Sanjay Garg: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 18.03.2024 Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’). 2. The Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Was Registered As A Charitable Institution U/S 12 Of The Act. The Assessee Claimed Deduction Of Income Being A Charitable Institution U/S 11 Of The Act. During The Assessment Proceedings, The Assessing Officer Noted That The Cit(Exemption) Vide Order Dated 22.02.2016 U/S 12Aa(3) Of The Act Has Withdrawn & Cancelled Registration Granted Earlier To The Assessee-Trust. In View Of The Said Cancellation Of Registration, The

Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 250Section 40Section 40A

Trust payments made by the assessee on the ground of non-deduction of TDS u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act. 17. The ld. counsel for the assessee has invited our attention to section 11 of the Act to submit that the provisions for application of section 40(a)(ia) in section 11 was introduced w.e.f. A.Y 2019-20. That

ITO, WD-1(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. THE INSTITUTE OF INDIAN FOUNDRYMEN, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue, is dismissed

ITA 593/KOL/2016[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata12 Sept 2018AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Ito(E), Wd-1(3), Kolkata Vs. The Institute Of Indian Foundrymen 6Th Floor, 10B, Middleton Row, Kolkata Iif Center, 335, Rajdanga Main – 700 071. Road, East Kolkata Township, P.O. Kolkata – 700 107. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaatt 6606 M (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) ..

For Appellant: Smt. Pinaki Mukherjee, Addl. CITFor Respondent: Shri Miraj D. Shah, AR
Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 145(3)

194C [payments to contractors]. We note that the difference arises because of timing of the transactions, which is the common issue in TDS matters. The relevant comparative facts and figures are given below: As per form 26AS As per assessee Difference Income