BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

13 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 191clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka427Delhi123Mumbai62Bangalore35Chennai24Jaipur17Calcutta16Lucknow15Chandigarh13Kolkata13Hyderabad13Ahmedabad10Pune8Allahabad3Telangana2Rajasthan2SC2Andhra Pradesh1Agra1Rajkot1Jodhpur1Cochin1

Key Topics

Section 12A27Section 201(1)10Section 194L8Section 1488Section 80G8Exemption8Addition to Income8Section 406Section 106

M/S MCC PTA INDIA CORPN. PVT. LTD.,PURBA MEDINIPUR vs. ACIT, CIR-59, TDS, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals filed by the Assessee are allowed

ITA 151/KOL/2016[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata18 Jul 2018AY 2011-2012
Section 11Section 194Section 194ISection 201(1)

charitable institution under the provisions of the Act, it cannot be disputed that the income of Kolkata Port Trust is not chargeable to tax under the provisions of the Act. Section 11 under which Kolkata Port Trust was assessed, inter alia, for the assessment year 2007-08 falls under Chapter III of the Act for “incomes which do not form

SUBHAS HARILAL DOSHI CHARITABLE TRUST,KOLKATA vs. CIT(EXEMPTIONS), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, assessee’s appeal stands allowed for statistical purpose

Section 1475
Deduction5
TDS5
ITA 566/KOL/2016[]Status: Disposed
ITAT Kolkata
26 Oct 2016

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri K.Narsimha Charysubhas Harilal Doshi बनाम Cit(Exemp.) Kolkata Charitable Trust, C/O. 10, Middleton Row, / V/S. S.L. Kochar, Advocate, Kolkata 86, Canning Street, Kolkata-700 001 [Pan No.Aaets 1899 P] .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ" /Respondent

Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(3)Section 132Section 132(4)Section 147Section 148

Charitable Trust u/s. 12AA(1) is hereby cancelled us. 12AA(3) of the Income Tax Act, 191 from 01.04.2009 (i.e. from the financial year 2009-10) the year in which activities of your organization were fund too be ingenuine and indulged in money laundering.” 4. Aggrieved by the order of Ld. CIT(E), assessee is in appeal before

MARTIN BURN LTD,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O WD - 4(2),KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1914/KOL/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Jul 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 40

charitable institution under the provisions of the Act, it cannot be disputed that the income of Kolkata Port Trust is not chargeable to tax under the provisions of the Act. Section 11 under which Kolkata Port Trust was assessed, inter alia, for the assessment year 2007-08 falls under Chapter III of the Act for “incomes which do not form

KALYAN EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,KOLKATA vs. C.I,T ,DURGAPUR, DURGAPUR

In the result, the appeal of assessee is partly allowed and for statistical purpose

ITA 779/KOL/2013[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 Jul 2020AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap(Kz) & Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80G

191 (SC) wherein it was held as under: “Head note: Section 12AA of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Charitable or religious trust

KALYAN EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,KOLKATA vs. C.I,T ,DURGAPUR, DURGAPUR

In the result, the appeal of assessee is partly allowed and for statistical purpose

ITA 778/KOL/2013[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 Jul 2020AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap(Kz) & Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80G

191 (SC) wherein it was held as under: “Head note: Section 12AA of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Charitable or religious trust

GOPSAI AVIANDAN SANGHA,PASCHIM MEDINIPUR vs. C.I.T.(EXEMPTION), KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 232/KOL/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata12 Apr 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Shri A.T. Varkey

Section 10Section 12ASection 80G(5)(vi)

charitable in nature. He was only guided by the findings of ld. Chief CIT by rejecting the grant of registration under section 10(23C) of the Act. The orders of the assessment passed under section 143(3) are the final finding of fact on the material found during the course of search or survey. There is no adverse inference recorded

GOPSAI AVIANDAN SANGHA,PASCHIM MEDINIPUR vs. C.I.T.(EXEMPTION), KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 233/KOL/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata12 Apr 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Shri A.T. Varkey

Section 10Section 12ASection 80G(5)(vi)

charitable in nature. He was only guided by the findings of ld. Chief CIT by rejecting the grant of registration under section 10(23C) of the Act. The orders of the assessment passed under section 143(3) are the final finding of fact on the material found during the course of search or survey. There is no adverse inference recorded

JERMEL'S ACCADEMY,SILIGURI vs. I.T.O., WARD - 1(4), , SILIGURI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed as per the directions mentioned above

ITA 1652/KOL/2024[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Mar 2025AY 2016-2017

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 11(1)Section 11(1)(A)Section 12ASection 12A(2)Section 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 250

191 (SC.)] has held that it is the duty of assessee to produce the books of account as well as all primary facts necessary for making the assessment at the earliest point of time. Hence, in the absence of any submission from the assessee and incomplete documents, the correct income of the assessee cannot be deduced. Thus this ground

M/S PEERLESS HOSPITEX HOSPITAL AND RESERCH CENTRE LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WD-11(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1107/KOL/2014[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata11 Jul 2018AY 2009-2010

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Aby. T. Varkey, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am ] I.T.A No. 1107/Kol/2014 Assessment Years : 2009-10 M/S Peerless Hospitex Hospital & Research Centre Ltd. -Vs- Ito, Ward-11(1), Kolkata [Pan: Aabcp 7225 L ] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Adv. (AR)For Respondent: Shri P. K. Srihari, CIT(DR)
Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 197(1)Section 40

trust registered u/s 12AA of the act. The assessee admits patients fro general ailments in its hospital but occasionally if they require services of Neuro doctors/ surgeons, they are referred to NNC and NNC raises bill on the assessee company. On the other hands, patients of NNC are also admitted in the assessee hospital and as and when these patients

SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER,PURBA MEDINIPUR vs. ITO, WD-TDS, HALDIA, PURBA MEDINIPUR

In the result, both the appeal of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1032/KOL/2016[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata07 Jul 2021AY 2011-2012

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri P. M. Jagtap & Hon’Ble Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

Section 194ASection 194LSection 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

charitable trust, set up in the year 1939, doing significant public service. During the relevant period, the assessee has made several payments, in respect of book binding charges, printing charges, advertisement and publicity and bus hire charges etc, but had not deducted tax at source from these payments. On these facts, the Assessing Officer required the assessee to show cause

SPECIAL LAND ACQUISTION OFFICER,PURBA MEDINIPUR vs. JCIT, R-59(TDS), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeal of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1256/KOL/2016[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata07 Jul 2021AY 2011-2012

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri P. M. Jagtap & Hon’Ble Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

Section 194ASection 194LSection 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

charitable trust, set up in the year 1939, doing significant public service. During the relevant period, the assessee has made several payments, in respect of book binding charges, printing charges, advertisement and publicity and bus hire charges etc, but had not deducted tax at source from these payments. On these facts, the Assessing Officer required the assessee to show cause

SHRI MANOJ KUMAR DHUPELIA,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - III, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals are allowed

ITA 674/KOL/2011[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Jun 2020AY 2002-03

Bench: Shri P.M.Jagtap, Vice- & Shri S.S.Godara

Section 147Section 148Section 69

section 254(1) of the Act on the above issue. It is the Petitioners’ case that there are such other glaring errors in the impugned order. However, looking at the entire controversy in the Petitions, it would be appropriate that the Petitions be disposed of finally at the stage of admission. This is particularly because the Petitions arise from

SMT. RUPAL DHUPELIA,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - III, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals are allowed

ITA 675/KOL/2011[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Jun 2020AY 2002-03

Bench: Shri P.M.Jagtap, Vice- & Shri S.S.Godara

Section 147Section 148Section 69

section 254(1) of the Act on the above issue. It is the Petitioners’ case that there are such other glaring errors in the impugned order. However, looking at the entire controversy in the Petitions, it would be appropriate that the Petitions be disposed of finally at the stage of admission. This is particularly because the Petitions arise from