BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

11 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 173clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka426Delhi126Mumbai103Pune46Ahmedabad39Bangalore38Lucknow29Chandigarh25Hyderabad23Chennai20Allahabad16Calcutta16Kolkata11Jaipur10Indore7Agra5Surat5Varanasi4Cochin3Amritsar3Raipur3Telangana3Nagpur2SC2Panaji2Rajasthan2Ranchi2Jodhpur1Andhra Pradesh1Orissa1Rajkot1Visakhapatnam1Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 12A35Section 26314Exemption8Section 143(3)7Section 117Section 2506Section 1485Section 1544Section 143(1)4Disallowance

JHA EDUCATIONAL TRUST,KOLKATA vs. CIT(EXEMPTIONS), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, all the three appeals of assessee are allowed

ITA 931/KOL/2016[]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata17 Mar 2017

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Partha Sarathi Chowdhury

Section 10Section 11(1)(d)Section 12ASection 13(1)Section 13(2)Section 133A

charitable work has been done byte he assessee by way of paying bogus donations, except pocketing cash for trustees. c) They have violated the objects of the trust by converting cheque paid through donation and received in cash. These bogus donations were paid towards the activities of trust which never happened and found to be on paper. ITA No.931-933/Kol/2016

4
Addition to Income4
Natural Justice4

KOLKATA METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,KOLKATA vs. J.C.I.T RANGE - 50,KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 724/KOL/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata18 Aug 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri A.T. Varkey, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am ] I.T.A Nos. 723 & 724/Kol/2013 Assessment Years : 2006-07 & 2007-08 Kolkata Metropolitan Development Authority -Vs- C.I.T.-Xvii, Kolkata [Pan: Aaalk 0714 F] (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A Nos. 523 & 524/Kol/2013 Assessment Years : 2006-07 & 2007-08 Kolkata Metropolitan Development Authority -Vs- J.C.I.T., Kolkata [Pan: Aaalk 0714 F] (Appellant) (Respondent) For The Appellant : Shri J.P. Khaitan, Sr. Counsel Of Assessee For The Respondent : Shri Anand R. Baiwar, Cit Date Of Hearing : 09.08.2017 Date Of Pronouncement : 18.08.2017

For Appellant: Shri J.P. Khaitan, Sr. Counsel of AssesseeFor Respondent: Shri Anand R. Baiwar, CIT
Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 148Section 263

charitable objects in the earlier years and substantive conditions stipulated in section 11 to 13 have been duly fulfilled by the said trust. The A.Yrs.2006-07 & 2007-08 benefit of retrospective application alone could be the intention of the legislature and this point is further strengthened by the Explanatory Notes to Finance (No. 2) Act, 2014 issued

KOLKATA METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,KOLKATA vs. J.C.I.T RANGE - 50,KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 723/KOL/2013[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata18 Aug 2017AY 2006-07

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri A.T. Varkey, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am ] I.T.A Nos. 723 & 724/Kol/2013 Assessment Years : 2006-07 & 2007-08 Kolkata Metropolitan Development Authority -Vs- C.I.T.-Xvii, Kolkata [Pan: Aaalk 0714 F] (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A Nos. 523 & 524/Kol/2013 Assessment Years : 2006-07 & 2007-08 Kolkata Metropolitan Development Authority -Vs- J.C.I.T., Kolkata [Pan: Aaalk 0714 F] (Appellant) (Respondent) For The Appellant : Shri J.P. Khaitan, Sr. Counsel Of Assessee For The Respondent : Shri Anand R. Baiwar, Cit Date Of Hearing : 09.08.2017 Date Of Pronouncement : 18.08.2017

For Appellant: Shri J.P. Khaitan, Sr. Counsel of AssesseeFor Respondent: Shri Anand R. Baiwar, CIT
Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 148Section 263

charitable objects in the earlier years and substantive conditions stipulated in section 11 to 13 have been duly fulfilled by the said trust. The A.Yrs.2006-07 & 2007-08 benefit of retrospective application alone could be the intention of the legislature and this point is further strengthened by the Explanatory Notes to Finance (No. 2) Act, 2014 issued

SRI RAMKRISHNA SAMITY,SILIGURI vs. D.C.I.T.CIR - 2,SILIGURI, SILIGURI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 1680/KOL/2012[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Oct 2015AY 2003-04

Bench: : Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: Shri Ananda Sen, Advocate, ld.ARFor Respondent: Dr. Adhir kr. Bar, CIT, ld.DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 147

charitable objects in the earlier years and substantive conditions stipulated in section 11 to 13 have been duly fulfilled by the said trust. The benefit of retrospective application alone could be the intention of the legislature and this point is further strengthened by the Explanatory Notes to Finance (No. 2) Act, 2014 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes

DCIT(E),CIRCLE-2, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S WEST BENGAL TRADE PROMOTION ORG., KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of revenue is dismissed

ITA 156/KOL/2017[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Jul 2018AY 2011-2012

Bench: "ी जे. सुधाकर रे"डी, लेखा सद"य एवं/And "ी ऐ. ट". वक", "यायीक सद"य) [Before Shri J. Sudhakar Reddy, Am & Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

Section 11Section 12ASection 12A(2)Section 147Section 148Section 25

charitable objects in the earlier years and substantive conditions stipulated in section 11 to 13 have been duly fulfilled by the said trust. The benefit of retrospective 3 4 West Bengal Trade Promotion Org.., AY 2011-12 application alone could be the intention of the legislature and this point is further strengthened by the Explanatory Notes to Finance

WEST BENGAL TRADE PROMOTION ORGANISATION LIMITED ,KOLKATA vs. ITO (EXEMPTION), WARD - 1(3), KOLKATA , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 36/KOL/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 Jul 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.36/Kol/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year:2009-10)

For Appellant: Shri B. R. Dutta, CA, Shri Saurabh Bagaria, Advocate & Shri RiteshFor Respondent: Shri I. Jamir, CIT, Sr. DR & Smt. Ranu Biswas, Addl. CIT
Section 11Section 12ASection 144Section 25

charitable objects in the earlier years and substantive conditions stipulated in section 11 to 13 have been duly fulfilled by the said trust. The benefit of retrospective application alone could be the intention of the legislature and this point is further strengthened by the Explanatory Notes to Finance (No. 2) Act, 2014 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes

FATHER LEBLOND TRUST,DARJEELING vs. CPC, BENGALURU, BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1577/KOL/2025[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata12 Dec 2025AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 11Section 12ASection 139Section 143(1)Section 154Section 250

173 taxmann.com 53 (Telangana). The Ld. DR relied upon the order of the Ld. CIT(A) and requested that the same may be upheld. 5. We have considered the submissions made, gone through the facts of the case and perused the record and the order of the Ld. CIT(A). It has been held in the case of Silk Association

SHREE AUTOMOTIVE PRIVATE LTD. ,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee for AY 2012-13 is allowed and appeal for AY 2013-14 is partly allowed

ITA 182/KOL/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata25 Jul 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri S. K. Tulsiyan, Advocate&Ms. PujaFor Respondent: Shri P. P. Barman, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 40A(2)Section 68

173 of the paper book. 8.2. Ld. Counsel also pointed out to the important fact in respect of assessment in assessee’s own case for the immediately preceding year i.e. AY 2011-12 which has been completed u/s. 143(3) dated 30.03.2014 wherein the subscribing company had invested a sum of Rs. 45 lakh in the share capital

SHREE AUTOMOTIVE PRIVATE LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR-10. , KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee for AY 2012-13 is allowed and appeal for AY 2013-14 is partly allowed

ITA 183/KOL/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata25 Jul 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri S. K. Tulsiyan, Advocate&Ms. PujaFor Respondent: Shri P. P. Barman, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 40A(2)Section 68

173 of the paper book. 8.2. Ld. Counsel also pointed out to the important fact in respect of assessment in assessee’s own case for the immediately preceding year i.e. AY 2011-12 which has been completed u/s. 143(3) dated 30.03.2014 wherein the subscribing company had invested a sum of Rs. 45 lakh in the share capital

RIDDHI SEVA KENDRA,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD 1(1), EXEMPT, , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 370/KOL/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Jun 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishrariddhi Seva Kendra, Adit, Cpc, Bengaluru, C/O Subas Agarwal & Ito, Ward-1(1), Exempt, Associates, Advocates, Siddha Kolkata Income Tax Office, Gibson, 1, Gibson Lane, Vs 10B, Middleton Road, Suite 213, 2Nd Floor, Kolkata - 700071 Kolkata - 700069 (Pan: Aaatr2893Q) (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Siddarth Agarwal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Kallol Mistry, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 250

Charitable Trust vs, ADIT, CPC Bangalore in ITA No.555/Ahd/2023 dt. 03.01.2024. iv) Shri Visha Oswal Jain Sewa Samaj vs. ITO vide ITA No. 59/Ahd/2022 order dated 11.10.2023. 7. Further submission was made stating that section 143(1) of the Act does not contain any provision for adjustment/addition to the returned income for disallowance of exemption and only any arithmetical error

M/S. MITRA PARISHAD,KOLKATA vs. CIT (EXEMPTIONS), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 2434/KOL/2016[-------]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata06 Sept 2017

Bench: "ी ऐ. ट". वक", "यायीक सद"य एवं/And "ी एम .बालागणेश, लेखा सद"य) [Before Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Shri M. Balaganesh, Am]

Section 12ASection 133ASection 80G(5)(vi)

Trust Deed leads to the ultimate conclusion that the society is in the act of money laundering.” After recording the said finding, Ld. CIT(E) was pleased to cancel the registration granted w.e.f. 01.04.2010. Aggrieved by the said decision of the Ld. CIT(E) the assessee society is in appeal before us. 4. We have heard rival submissions and have