BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 151clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka431Delhi205Mumbai106Chennai80Bangalore40Chandigarh31Pune31Jaipur26Ahmedabad25Hyderabad23Allahabad16Calcutta16Lucknow16Agra10Rajkot5Indore4Telangana4Rajasthan3Amritsar2Nagpur2Varanasi2Kolkata2Cuttack2Visakhapatnam1Andhra Pradesh1Dehradun1Jabalpur1SC1

Key Topics

Section 1486Section 694Section 1472Addition to Income2Undisclosed Income2

SHRI MANOJ KUMAR DHUPELIA,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - III, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals are allowed

ITA 674/KOL/2011[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Jun 2020AY 2002-03

Bench: Shri P.M.Jagtap, Vice- & Shri S.S.Godara

Section 147Section 148Section 69

151(2) of the IT Act, 1961 in order to issue notice u/s. 147/148 of the IT Act. A copy of the relevant portion of the TEP is enclosed herewith. Dated: 26.3.2009.” Mr. Tulsiyan’s case next invited our attention to the assessee’s re-opening reasons (supra) that the concerned Assessing Officer(s) in the instant assessees’ cases have

SMT. RUPAL DHUPELIA,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - III, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals are allowed

ITA 675/KOL/2011[2002-03]Status: Disposed
ITAT Kolkata
15 Jun 2020
AY 2002-03

Bench: Shri P.M.Jagtap, Vice- & Shri S.S.Godara

Section 147Section 148Section 69

151(2) of the IT Act, 1961 in order to issue notice u/s. 147/148 of the IT Act. A copy of the relevant portion of the TEP is enclosed herewith. Dated: 26.3.2009.” Mr. Tulsiyan’s case next invited our attention to the assessee’s re-opening reasons (supra) that the concerned Assessing Officer(s) in the instant assessees’ cases have