ST JOSEPH'S CONVENT CHANDANNAGAR EDUCATINAL SOCITY.,KOLKATA vs. J.C.I.T. (OSD), CIR- 2,HOOGHLY, HOOGHLY

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am]

charitable trust is not in violation of section 13(1)( c) of the Act as the said payment is not made for the benefit of any person either directly or indirectly referred to in section 13(3) of the Act. 5.3. The Learned AR argued that even assuming without conceding, that the donation paid by assessee trust to another trust

THE INSTITUTE OF INDIAN FOUNDRYMEN,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD 1(3), EXEMPTION , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey]

13) defines business to include any trade, commerce or manufacture or any adventure or concern in the nature of trade, commerce or manufacture. The intention of the legislature is to make the definition extensive as the term “includes” has been used. The legislature has deliberately departed from giving a definite import to the term ”business” but has made reference

THE INSTITUTE OF INDIAN FOUNDRYMEN. ,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD-1(3), EXEMPT, KOLKATA. , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

13) defines business to include any trade, commerce or manufacture or any adventure or concern in the nature of trade, commerce or manufacture. The intention of the legislature is to make the definition extensive as the term “includes” has been used. The legislature has deliberately departed from giving a definite import to the term ”business” but has made reference

THE INSTITUTE OF INDIAN FOUNDRYMEN ,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD- 1(3), EXEMPT, KOLKATA. , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

13) defines business to include any trade, commerce or manufacture or any adventure or concern in the nature of trade, commerce or manufacture. The intention of the legislature is to make the definition extensive as the term “includes” has been used. The legislature has deliberately departed from giving a definite import to the term ”business” but has made reference

THE INSTITUTE OF INDIA FOUNDRYMEN,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD-1(3),EXEMPT, KOLKATA., KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

13) defines business to include any trade, commerce or manufacture or any adventure or concern in the nature of trade, commerce or manufacture. The intention of the legislature is to make the definition extensive as the term “includes” has been used. The legislature has deliberately departed from giving a definite import to the term ”business” but has made reference

THE INSTITUTE OF INDIAN FOUNDRYMEN,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 1(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm]

C” BENCH, KOLKATA [Before Shri Rajesh Kumar, AM & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, JM] I.T.A. No. 1123/Kol/2024 Assessment Year: 2018-19 The Institute of Indian Foundrymen Vs. ITO, Ward-1(3) (Exemption), Kolkata. IIF Center, 335, Rajdanga Main Road, Kolkata-700107. (PAN:AAATT6606M) Appellant Respondent Date of conclusion of Hearing 18.09.2024 Date of Pronouncement 15.10.2024 For the Assessee Shri Sunil Surana

THE INSTITUTE OF INDIAN FOUNDRYMEN,KOLKATA vs. ITO,WARD-1(3), EXEMPT, KOLKATA. , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rajesh Kumar]

13) defines business to include any trade, commerce or manufacture or any adventure or concern in the nature of trade, commerce or manufacture. The intention of the legislature is to make the definition extensive as the term “includes” has been used. The legislature has deliberately departed from giving a definite import to the term ”business” but has made reference

ACIT(EXEMPTIONS), CIR-1, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. HOOGHLY ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY COLLEGE SOCIETY, HOOGHLY

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am ] I.T.A No. 1579/Kol/2016 Assessment Year : 2010-11 Acit (Exemptions), Cir-1, Kolkata -Vs- Hooghly Engineering & Technology College Society [Pan: Aaah 2856 A] (Appellant) (Respondent)

c ) read with section 13(2)(a) of the Act in as much as payments have been diverted by the assessee trust for the benefit of interested persons specified in section 13(3) of the Act. Now the short question that arises for our consideration is as to whether the payments made by assessee trust to other two independent trusts

LOTUS CHARITABLE TRUST,KOLKATA vs. DIT(EXEMPTIONS), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan, Jm & Shri M. Balaganesh, Am]

c) For that the Ld. Director of Income Tax (Exemption) further erred in holding that the activities of the Trust cannot be categorized under the limb of "medical relief' within the meaning of the provision of Section 2(15) of the Act. 3) For that the Ld. Director of Income Tax (Exemption) erred in holding that term medical relief

PANCHI BIBI WAKF ESTATE,KOLKATA vs. DDIT (E)-II, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Waseem Ahmed

C) such allowance or accommodation to mutwalli is not hit by the provisions of Section 13(2) read with Section 13(3) of the Income Tax Act 1961 IV. For that the Ld. C.I.T.(A) grossly erred both in law and in fact in confirming addition of Rs.14,11,200/- as deemed income on the alleged ground that provisions

M/S JMS MINING PVT. LTD,KOLKATA vs. PCIT-2, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri P. M .Jagtap, Vice-(Kz) & Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

13 M/s JMS Mining Pvt. Ltd. A.Y. 2016-17 (3) …………………. (4) ………………. (5) This Section applies to donations to any institution or fund referred to in Sub-clause (iv) of Clause (a) of Sub-section (2), only if it is established in India for a charitable purpose and if it fulfills the following condition namely: (i) ………. (a) …………. (b) …………… (c

LAKSHMI TRUST,KOLKATA vs. ITO, (E) - II, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the assessees are treated as partly allowed as indicated above

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap

C] -Vs.- Income Tax Officer (Exemption)-II, Kolkata,….....................Respondent & I.T.A. No. 396/KOL/ 2014 Assessment year : 2006-2007 Harsh Vardhan Charity Trust,................…….........................Appellant 90/31, Diamond Harbour Road, Kolkata-700 038 [PAN : AAATH 1762 N] -Vs.- Income Tax Officer (Exemption)-II, Kolkata,….....................Respondent Appearances by: Smt. Nilima Joshi, FCA, for the assessees Shri Subhrajoti Bhattacharyay, JCIT, Sr. D.R., for the Department Date

I.T.O(E)-II, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. FUTURE EDUCATION RESCARCH TRUST., KOLKATA

In the result, assessee’s CO is dismissed as infructuous

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi & C.O.No.69/Kol/2013 (A/O Ita No.1031/Kol/2013) Assessment Year:2009-10

charitable purposes of the trust. The payments were routed through Dr M Ghosh because of practical reasons; the reasons being the sellers of property were either reluctant to sell property to trust or used to inflate prices if purchased in the name of trust. In one case, as the deal could not materialize, the entire amount was deposited back

M/S. CALCUTTA CRICKET & FOOTBALL CLUB,KOLKATA vs. ITO, EXEMPTION, WARD 1(1). KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy, Hon’Ble & Sri Sanjay Garg, Hon’Ble) [Virtual Court Hearing] M/S. Calcutta Cricket & Football Club......................................................................……....….....Appellant 10B, Middleton Row Kolkata – 700 071 [Pan : Aaccc 6337 P] Vs. Income Tax Officer, Exemption – Ward(1), Kolkata…………….....................….…....…… Respondent Appearances By: Shri J.P. Khaitan, Sr. Advocate & Shri Manoj Kataruka, Advocate, Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee. Shri Supriyo Pal, Addl. Cit D/R, Appearing On Behalf Of The Revenue. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : January 13Th, 2021 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : February 5Th, 2021 Order Per J. Sudhakar Reddy, Am :-

C’ BENCH, KOLKATA (Before Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy, Hon’ble Accountant Member & Sri Sanjay Garg, Hon’ble Judicial Member) [VIRTUAL COURT HEARING] M/s. Calcutta Cricket & Football Club......................................................................……....….....Appellant 10B, Middleton Row Kolkata – 700 071 [PAN : AACCC 6337 P] Vs. Income Tax Officer, Exemption – Ward(1), Kolkata…………….....................….…....…… Respondent Appearances by: Shri J.P. Khaitan, Sr. Advocate & Shri Manoj Kataruka, Advocate, appeared

BALLARAM HANUMANDAS CHARITABLE TRUST,KOLKATA vs. CIT(EXEMPTIONS), KOL., KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of assessee stands allowed

Bench: Shri Aby.T Varkey & Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year :2012-13

C] अपीलाथ" /Appellant .. ""यथ"/Respondent अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/By Appellant Shri A.K. Tibrewal, FCA & Shri Amit Agarwal, Advocate Shri G. Hangshing, CIT-DR ""यथ" क" ओर से/By Respondent 02-08-2017 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing 15-09-2017 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement आदेश /O R D E R PER Waseem Ahmed, Accountant

ACIT(E), CIR -1, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. WEST BENGAL TRANSPORT WORKERS SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEME, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Sh. P.M.Jagtap & Sh.S.S.Viswanethra Raviacit(E), Vs West Bengal Transport Workers Circle-1, 5Th Floor, Social Security Scheme, 10B, Middleton Row, 6, Church Lane, 4Th Floor, Kolkata-700071. Kolkata-700001. Pan-Aaalw0133G (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Sh. Sankar Halder, Addl. Cit, Sr.Dr Respondent By Sh.S.M.Surana, Advocate Date Of Hearing 29.11.2018 Date Of Pronouncement 26.02.2019 Order Per S.S. Viswanethra Ravithis Appeal Filed By The Revenue Against The Order Dated 26.04.2016 Passed By Cit(A)-25, Kolkata For Ay 2011-12 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short “Act”).

13 onwards, I consider to also state that - section 12A/12AA is not applicable at all to the appellant. The Sections 11, 12, 12A, 12AA concern only charitable and religious trust/institutions. The Scheme is not a charitable or religious trust/institution. It is a social security Scheme of the Government. It is out of abundant caution again that the Scheme had applied

ASANSOL DURGAPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,DURGAPUR vs. CIT, DURGAPUR, DURGAPUR

In the result, assessee’s appeal stands allowed

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Raviasansol Durgapur V/S. Commissioner Of Development Authority Income Tax, 1St Administrative Durgapur, Urmila Building, City Center, Bhawan, City Center Durgapur, West Bengal [Pan No.Aaala 0733G] .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

c) Contractual income from 15.19 8.27 NIL Public Private Partnership d) Ground rent/licence fee etc. 0.81 0.94 2.63 as rental income e) Interest and dividend 11.22 5.64 3.49 On the basis of aforesaid income, the Ld. CIT observed that the activities of assessee are in the nature of trade, commerce or business or in relation to rendering of any services

JHA EDUCATIONAL TRUST,KOLKATA vs. CIT(EXEMPTIONS), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, all the three appeals of assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Partha Sarathi Chowdhury

2 Savitri Education Foundation, 124, Hans Bhawan,Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi- 6,00,000 110002 13-14 1 MRS Educational Trust, 39-A, Armenian 1,00,000 Street, Ground Floor, Kolkata-700 001 (WB) 14-15 1 Tata Medical Centre Trust, 1, Biship Lefroy 11,000 Road, Kolkata-700 020 (WB) The ld. CIT(Exemption) also called