THE INSTITUTE OF INDIAN FOUNDRYMEN,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD 1(3), EXEMPTION , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey]

b) Any activity of rendering any service in relation to any trade, commerce or business; For a cess or fee or any other consideration, irrespective of the nature of use or application, or retention of the income from such activity. 2. The following implications arise from this amendment – 2.1 The newly inserted proviso to section 2(15) will not apply

THE INSTITUTE OF INDIAN FOUNDRYMEN. ,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD-1(3), EXEMPT, KOLKATA. , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

b) Any activity of rendering any service in relation to any trade, commerce or business; For a cess or fee or any other consideration, irrespective of the nature of use or application, or retention of the income from such activity. 2. The following implications arise from this amendment – 2.1 The newly inserted proviso to section 2(15) will not apply

THE INSTITUTE OF INDIAN FOUNDRYMEN ,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD- 1(3), EXEMPT, KOLKATA. , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

b) Any activity of rendering any service in relation to any trade, commerce or business; For a cess or fee or any other consideration, irrespective of the nature of use or application, or retention of the income from such activity. 2. The following implications arise from this amendment – 2.1 The newly inserted proviso to section 2(15) will not apply

THE INSTITUTE OF INDIA FOUNDRYMEN,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD-1(3),EXEMPT, KOLKATA., KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

b) Any activity of rendering any service in relation to any trade, commerce or business; For a cess or fee or any other consideration, irrespective of the nature of use or application, or retention of the income from such activity. 2. The following implications arise from this amendment – 2.1 The newly inserted proviso to section 2(15) will not apply

THE INSTITUTE OF INDIAN FOUNDRYMEN,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 1(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm]

b) Any activity of rendering any service in relation to any trade, commerce or business; For a cess or fee or any other consideration, irrespective of the nature of use or application, or retention of the income from such activity. 2. The following implications arise from this amendment – 2.1 The newly inserted proviso to section 2(15) will not apply

THE INSTITUTE OF INDIAN FOUNDRYMEN,KOLKATA vs. ITO,WARD-1(3), EXEMPT, KOLKATA. , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rajesh Kumar]

b) Any activity of rendering any service in relation to any trade, commerce or business; For a cess or fee or any other consideration, irrespective of the nature of use or application, or retention of the income from such activity. 2. The following implications arise from this amendment – 2.1 The newly inserted proviso to section 2(15) will not apply

ST JOSEPH'S CONVENT CHANDANNAGAR EDUCATINAL SOCITY.,KOLKATA vs. J.C.I.T. (OSD), CIR- 2,HOOGHLY, HOOGHLY

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am]

b) of the Act refers to payment made by the assessee trust to any person who has contributed more than Rs 50,000/- (i.e substantial contribution) to the assessee trust. It does not refer to payment made by one trust exceeding Rs. 50,000/- to another registered charitable trust . In fact the payment made by one trust to another trust

LOTUS CHARITABLE TRUST,KOLKATA vs. DIT(EXEMPTIONS), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan, Jm & Shri M. Balaganesh, Am]

b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, where the grant of registration requires satisfaction about the objects of the trust as well as the genuineness of the activities, for the cancellation of the registration under section 9 Lotus Charitable Trust AY 2009-10 12AA(3), all that it is insisted upon is the satisfaction as to whether the activities

ACIT(EXEMPTIONS), CIR-1, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. HOOGHLY ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY COLLEGE SOCIETY, HOOGHLY

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am ] I.T.A No. 1579/Kol/2016 Assessment Year : 2010-11 Acit (Exemptions), Cir-1, Kolkata -Vs- Hooghly Engineering & Technology College Society [Pan: Aaah 2856 A] (Appellant) (Respondent)

2)(a) of the Act in as much as payments have been diverted by the assessee trust for the benefit of interested persons specified in section 13(3) of the Act. Now the short question that arises for our consideration is as to whether the payments made by assessee trust to other two independent trusts would fall under the ambit

PANCHI BIBI WAKF ESTATE,KOLKATA vs. DDIT (E)-II, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Waseem Ahmed

b) of sub-section (4A) of section 11 are satisfied. Section 11(4A) has no application to the petitioner- trust as it is not a trust wholly for public religious purposes, but it is a trust created for public charitable purposes. From the above we find that it is not disputed that the business undertaking of the assessee is held

M/S JMS MINING PVT. LTD,KOLKATA vs. PCIT-2, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri P. M .Jagtap, Vice-(Kz) & Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

13 M/s JMS Mining Pvt. Ltd. A.Y. 2016-17 (3) …………………. (4) ………………. (5) This Section applies to donations to any institution or fund referred to in Sub-clause (iv) of Clause (a) of Sub-section (2), only if it is established in India for a charitable purpose and if it fulfills the following condition namely: (i) ………. (a) …………. (b

THE WEST BENGAL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF JURIDICIAL SCIENCE,KOLKATA vs. CIT(EXEMPTION) , KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

charitable or religious purposes, either during the period of accumulation or thereafter.] purposes, either during the period of accumulation or thereafter.] Section 13(9) of the Act, reads as follows: Section 13(9) of the Act, reads as follows:- “[(9) Nothing contained in sub [(9) Nothing contained in sub-section (2) of section 11 shall operate so as to exclude

BALLARAM HANUMANDAS CHARITABLE TRUST,KOLKATA vs. CIT(EXEMPTIONS), KOL., KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of assessee stands allowed

Bench: Shri Aby.T Varkey & Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year :2012-13

b) of s. 12AA makes it clear that the CIT has to satisfy himself about the genuineness of the activities of the trust or institution and also about the objects of the trust or the institution. On being satisfied about the genuineness of the activities of the trust or the institution and also about its objects, the CIT would either

M/S. CALCUTTA CRICKET & FOOTBALL CLUB,KOLKATA vs. ITO, EXEMPTION, WARD 1(1). KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy, Hon’Ble & Sri Sanjay Garg, Hon’Ble) [Virtual Court Hearing] M/S. Calcutta Cricket & Football Club......................................................................……....….....Appellant 10B, Middleton Row Kolkata – 700 071 [Pan : Aaccc 6337 P] Vs. Income Tax Officer, Exemption – Ward(1), Kolkata…………….....................….…....…… Respondent Appearances By: Shri J.P. Khaitan, Sr. Advocate & Shri Manoj Kataruka, Advocate, Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee. Shri Supriyo Pal, Addl. Cit D/R, Appearing On Behalf Of The Revenue. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : January 13Th, 2021 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : February 5Th, 2021 Order Per J. Sudhakar Reddy, Am :-

section 11(2) the said entire amount of Rs. 55,000 will get exempted from the tax net. 3 ITA No. 499/Kol/2019; M/s. Calcutta Cricket & Football Club M/s. Calcutta Cricket & Football Club 13. We may also at this stage mention that the Kerala High Court in H.H. Marthanda We may also at this stage mention that the Kerala High Court

M/S. SETH B D GOYAL CHARITABLE TRUST,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O. WARD - 1(3), EXEMPTION, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

13,66,994/- u/s. 11 of the I.T. Act however Form 10B was not filed within due date. I.T.A. No.: 2267/KOL/2024 Assessment Year: 2020-21 M/s. Seth B D Goyal Charitable Trust. 5.3. The A.O., CPC disallowed the exemption claimed by the appellant in its ITR under section 11 of the Act during processing of ITR filed

ACIT(E), CIR -1, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. WEST BENGAL TRANSPORT WORKERS SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEME, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Sh. P.M.Jagtap & Sh.S.S.Viswanethra Raviacit(E), Vs West Bengal Transport Workers Circle-1, 5Th Floor, Social Security Scheme, 10B, Middleton Row, 6, Church Lane, 4Th Floor, Kolkata-700071. Kolkata-700001. Pan-Aaalw0133G (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Sh. Sankar Halder, Addl. Cit, Sr.Dr Respondent By Sh.S.M.Surana, Advocate Date Of Hearing 29.11.2018 Date Of Pronouncement 26.02.2019 Order Per S.S. Viswanethra Ravithis Appeal Filed By The Revenue Against The Order Dated 26.04.2016 Passed By Cit(A)-25, Kolkata For Ay 2011-12 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short “Act”).

13 onwards, I consider to also state that - section 12A/12AA is not applicable at all to the appellant. The Sections 11, 12, 12A, 12AA concern only charitable and religious trust/institutions. The Scheme is not a charitable or religious trust/institution. It is a social security Scheme of the Government. It is out of abundant caution again that the Scheme had applied

JHA EDUCATIONAL TRUST,KOLKATA vs. CIT(EXEMPTIONS), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, all the three appeals of assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Partha Sarathi Chowdhury

13(2) was applicable; (v) the assessee misused the provisions ofsections12AA and 80G(5)(vi); (vi) no charitable work was done by the assessee by giving donations; (vii) the activities of the assessee were not genuine or were not carried out in accordance with or were contrary to its objects; and his purported findings invoking sub-sections

JAGANNATH GUPTA FAMILY TRUST,KOLKATA vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTIONS), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

Bench: : Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri Dr. A.L. Saini

b) are complied with. 39. Sub-section (3) again says that if any income referred to in sub-section (2) is applied to purposes other than charitable or religious purposes as aforesaid or ceases to be accumulated or set apart for application thereto, or ceases to remain invested or deposited in any of the forms or modes specified