THE INSTITUTE OF INDIAN FOUNDRYMEN. ,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD-1(3), EXEMPT, KOLKATA. , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

38. In view of the above discussion, we are of the considered view that in the given facts and detailed reading of the various judicial decisions through the years, interpreting the definition of “charitable purpose” as laid out in section 2(15) of the Act and also the definition of “business” in relation to the said section amply revels that

THE INSTITUTE OF INDIAN FOUNDRYMEN ,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD- 1(3), EXEMPT, KOLKATA. , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

38. In view of the above discussion, we are of the considered view that in the given facts and detailed reading of the various judicial decisions through the years, interpreting the definition of “charitable purpose” as laid out in section 2(15) of the Act and also the definition of “business” in relation to the said section amply revels that

THE INSTITUTE OF INDIAN FOUNDRYMEN,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD 1(3), EXEMPTION , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey]

38. In view of the above discussion, we are of the considered view that in the given facts and detailed reading of the various judicial decisions through the years, interpreting the definition of “charitable purpose” as laid out in section 2(15) of the Act and also the definition of “business” in relation to the said section amply revels that

INDIAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE. ,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR-1(1), (EXEMPTION), KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpalyadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar]

38. In view of the above discussion, we are of the considered view that in the given facts and detailed reading of the various judicial decisions through the years, interpreting the definition of “charitable purpose” as laid out in section 2(15) of the Act and also the definition of “business” in relation to the said section amply revels that

INDIAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE,KOLKATA vs. DCIT,CIR-1(1), (EXEMPTION), KOLKATA. , KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpalyadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar]

38. In view of the above discussion, we are of the considered view that in the given facts and detailed reading of the various judicial decisions through the years, interpreting the definition of “charitable purpose” as laid out in section 2(15) of the Act and also the definition of “business” in relation to the said section amply revels that

THE INSTITUTE OF INDIAN FOUNDRYMEN,KOLKATA vs. ITO,WARD-1(3), EXEMPT, KOLKATA. , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rajesh Kumar]

38. In view of the above discussion, we are of the considered view that in the given facts and detailed reading of the various judicial decisions through the years, interpreting the definition 15 I.T.A. No. 906/Kol/2023 Assessment Years: 2014-15 The Institute of Indian Foundrymen of “charitable purpose” as laid out in section 2(15) of the Act and also

THE INSTITUTE OF INDIAN FOUNDRYMEN,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 1(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm]

10 The Institute of Indian Foundrymen, AY 2018-19 assessment of the assessee in the A.Ys 1948-49 to wherein relevant to the said AYs 948-49 to 1952-53, by the last paragraph of sub-section (3) of the IT Act, 1922”, charitable purposes” was defined as “… .. In this sub-section “Charitable purpose” includes relief of the poor, education

JAGANNATH GUPTA FAMILY TRUST,KOLKATA vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTIONS), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

Bench: : Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri Dr. A.L. Saini

38. This also means that even that income, which could not be exempted under sub- clause (a) or (b) of sub-section (1), can still be exempted, if the conditions attached to sub- section (2) in its sub-clauses (a) and (b) are complied with. 39. Sub-section (3) again says that if any income referred to in sub-section

SRI GOVINDDEO EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE,KOLKATA vs. DY.DIT(E)-1, KOLKATA. , KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2011-12 Sri Govinddeo Educational Ddit, Exemption Circle-1, Institute Kolkata Vs. 78, Syed Amir Ali Avenue, Ballygunge, Kolkata-700019. (Pan: Aabts6053J) (Appellant) (Respondent)

charitable activity. Now, the only allegation is that the appellant Trust has applied only 12% of its receipts and accumulated 88%. We find that under the provision of Section 10(23C)(iiiae) of the Act, there is no limit prescribed for application of receipts and accumulation of receipts. Therefore, the appellant Trust is within its rights to accumulate the receipts

PRAMOD LAKRA,DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -11(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. PHILIPS CARBON BLACK LTD , KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey&Shri Sanjay Awasthi]

10 I.T.A. Nos. 2456 to 2459/Kol/2024 Assessment Years: 2017-18, 2018-19, 2020-21, 2021-22 Phillips Carbon Black Ltd. 12. Going over the above discussion, we do not find any infirmity in the order of Ld. CIT(A) on this issue. (iii) Disallowance of deduction claimed in respect of CSR donations u/s 80G of the Act and Ground

PCBL LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. A.C.I.T., CIRCLE - 11(1),, KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey&Shri Sanjay Awasthi]

10 I.T.A. Nos. 2456 to 2459/Kol/2024 Assessment Years: 2017-18, 2018-19, 2020-21, 2021-22 Phillips Carbon Black Ltd. 12. Going over the above discussion, we do not find any infirmity in the order of Ld. CIT(A) on this issue. (iii) Disallowance of deduction claimed in respect of CSR donations u/s 80G of the Act and Ground

PRAMOD LAKRA, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-11(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. PHILLIPS CARBON BLACK LTD, KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey&Shri Sanjay Awasthi]

10 I.T.A. Nos. 2456 to 2459/Kol/2024 Assessment Years: 2017-18, 2018-19, 2020-21, 2021-22 Phillips Carbon Black Ltd. 12. Going over the above discussion, we do not find any infirmity in the order of Ld. CIT(A) on this issue. (iii) Disallowance of deduction claimed in respect of CSR donations u/s 80G of the Act and Ground

PRAMOD LAKRA,DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 11(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. PHILLIPS CARBON BLACK LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey&Shri Sanjay Awasthi]

10 I.T.A. Nos. 2456 to 2459/Kol/2024 Assessment Years: 2017-18, 2018-19, 2020-21, 2021-22 Phillips Carbon Black Ltd. 12. Going over the above discussion, we do not find any infirmity in the order of Ld. CIT(A) on this issue. (iii) Disallowance of deduction claimed in respect of CSR donations u/s 80G of the Act and Ground

PRAMOD LAKRA, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 11(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. PHILLIPS CARBON BLACK LTD, KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey&Shri Sanjay Awasthi]

10 I.T.A. Nos. 2456 to 2459/Kol/2024 Assessment Years: 2017-18, 2018-19, 2020-21, 2021-22 Phillips Carbon Black Ltd. 12. Going over the above discussion, we do not find any infirmity in the order of Ld. CIT(A) on this issue. (iii) Disallowance of deduction claimed in respect of CSR donations u/s 80G of the Act and Ground

SHRI VENKATESHWARA EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD-1(3), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

charitable activity. Now, the only allegation is that the appellant Trust has applied only 12% of its receipts and accumulated 88%. We find that under the provision of Section 10(23C)(iiiae) of the Act, there is no limit prescribed for application of receipts and accumulation of receipts. Therefore, the appellant Trust is within its rights to accumulate the receipts

RUKMANI BIRLA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O.(EXEMPTION), WARD-1(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice- & Shri Rajesh Kumar]

charitable activity. Now, the only allegation is that the appellant Trust has applied only 12% of its receipts and accumulated 88%. We find that under the provision of Section 10(23C)(iiiae) of the Act, there is no limit prescribed for application of receipts and accumulation of receipts. Therefore, the appellant Trust is within its rights to accumulate the receipts

ACIT(EXEMPTIONS), CIR-1, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. HOOGHLY ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY COLLEGE SOCIETY, HOOGHLY

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am ] I.T.A No. 1579/Kol/2016 Assessment Year : 2010-11 Acit (Exemptions), Cir-1, Kolkata -Vs- Hooghly Engineering & Technology College Society [Pan: Aaah 2856 A] (Appellant) (Respondent)

10,00,000/- and fund received from Bikash Bhawan to the tune of Rs 3,00,000/- which had been shown as capital receipt by the assessee trust. The ld AO held that the same are revenue receipts and ought to have been credited in the Income & Expenditure Account of the trust. Accordingly, he brought to tax the Excess

DREAMLAND EDUCATION SOCIETY,HOOGHLY vs. ACIT, CIR-2, HOOGHLY, HOOGHLY

In the result the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Hon’Ble Sri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Dr.Arjun Lal Saini, Am] I.T.A Nos. 489-495/Kol/2016 Assessment Years : 2005-06 To 2011-12

Trust, Society, Individual, Partnership firm or company. Here in the case of Dreamland Educational Society which derives excess of income over expenditure should reasonably be considered income under the head -' Income From Other Sources' under section 2(24(iia) read with section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act.” 6 7 ITA Nos.489-495/Kol/2016 Dreamland Education Society A.Yrs