BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

232 results for “charitable trust”+ Addition to Incomeclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,170Delhi992Chennai680Karnataka492Bangalore461Ahmedabad334Pune275Jaipur254Kolkata232Hyderabad178Chandigarh139Cochin120Amritsar85Lucknow79Indore71Surat70Rajkot66Cuttack49Allahabad49Visakhapatnam43Nagpur39Agra37Raipur32Jodhpur30Telangana26Patna23Calcutta19SC14Panaji14Guwahati13Dehradun13Jabalpur11Varanasi10Kerala9Ranchi8Rajasthan4Orissa3Himachal Pradesh2Andhra Pradesh2Punjab & Haryana2J&K1T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 12A105Section 11101Section 143(1)71Section 80G62Exemption60Addition to Income59Section 25037Charitable Trust37Section 234E35Section 143(3)

LOTUS CHARITABLE TRUST,KOLKATA vs. DIT(EXEMPTIONS), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 398/KOL/2012[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata08 Jun 2016AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan, Jm & Shri M. Balaganesh, Am]

For Appellant: Shri D. S. Damle, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Rajat Subhra Biswas, CIT, DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 80G

trusts and institutions, cancellation of registration granted u/s 12AA may lead to a charitable institution getting hit by sub-section (3) of section 115TD and becoming liable to tax on accreted income. The cancellation of registration without justifiable reasons may, therefore, cause additional

Showing 1–20 of 232 · Page 1 of 12

...
33
Section 1029
Deduction26

M/S. CALCUTTA CRICKET & FOOTBALL CLUB,KOLKATA vs. ITO, EXEMPTION, WARD 1(1). KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 499/KOL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Feb 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy, Hon’Ble & Sri Sanjay Garg, Hon’Ble) [Virtual Court Hearing] M/S. Calcutta Cricket & Football Club......................................................................……....….....Appellant 10B, Middleton Row Kolkata – 700 071 [Pan : Aaccc 6337 P] Vs. Income Tax Officer, Exemption – Ward(1), Kolkata…………….....................….…....…… Respondent Appearances By: Shri J.P. Khaitan, Sr. Advocate & Shri Manoj Kataruka, Advocate, Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee. Shri Supriyo Pal, Addl. Cit D/R, Appearing On Behalf Of The Revenue. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : January 13Th, 2021 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : February 5Th, 2021 Order Per J. Sudhakar Reddy, Am :-

Section 11(1)(a)Section 11(2)Section 250

additional amount of Rs. 20,000 of accumulated income will get excluded from the tax net as per section 11(2). excluded from the tax net as per section 11(2). (iv) The remaining balance of the accumulated income out of Rs. 55,000, that is, Rs. 35 The remaining balance of the accumulated income

ST JOSEPH'S CONVENT CHANDANNAGAR EDUCATINAL SOCITY.,KOLKATA vs. J.C.I.T. (OSD), CIR- 2,HOOGHLY, HOOGHLY

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1695/KOL/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata11 May 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am]

For Appellant: Shri Miraj D.Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Pinaki Mukherjee, JCIT(DR)
Section 11Section 12ASection 13Section 13(1)Section 13(3)(b)Section 143(3)

additional grounds of appeal or modify, withdraw any of the above grounds at the time of hearing of the appeal.” 3 St.Joseph’s Convent Chandannagar Education Society A.Yr.2009-10 5. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. We find that the assessee trust is a registered charitable trust enjoying registration u/s 12AA

BALLARAM HANUMANDAS CHARITABLE TRUST,KOLKATA vs. CIT(EXEMPTIONS), KOL., KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of assessee stands allowed

ITA 431/KOL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Sept 2017AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Aby.T Varkey & Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year :2012-13

Section 12ASection 133Section 35(1)(ii)

addition in fixed assets was made for ₹38.02 crores. Ld. AR further submitted that director of QSP has given contradictory statement in Question No. 37 of the statement ITA No.431/Kol/2017 A.Y. 2012-13 Ballaram Hanumandas Charitable Trust Vs. CIT(Ex) Kol. Page 6 wherein it was stated that Pushpa Devi Bansal Charitable Trust is actively engaged for upliftment of poor

DDIT (EXEMPTIONS)-I/KOL, KOLKATA vs. DEVI KAMAL TRUST ESTATE, KOLKATA

In the result the appeal by the revenue is partly allowed

ITA 137/KOL/2009[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Dec 2015AY 2005-06

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Am ]

For Appellant: Shri P.B.Pramanik, JCIT., Sr.DRFor Respondent: Shri Animesh Mukherjee, FCA &
Section 11Section 11(1)Section 12A

charitable purpose during the relevant previous year, cannot be accepted. The AO accordingly computed income of the Assessee as given below :- ITA No.137/Kol/2009 – Devi Kamal Trust Estate – A.Y.2005-06 5 Income from Other Sources :- . Bank Interest : Rs.5,10,22,843/- TOTAL TAXABLE INCOME : Rs.5,10,22,843/- Rounded off to : Rs.5,10,22,840/-“ 11. Before CIT(A) the Assessee filed

GOLDEN SAND TRUST,KOLKATA vs. CIT(EXEMPTIONS), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 1815/KOL/2016[]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 Mar 2017

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Am]

For Appellant: “1. For that on the facts and in the circumstances of the case
Section 11oSection 12ASection 80G

income for charitable purpose. The Ld. AR submitted that the specific aspect of utilization of donation received from SFWHP was enquired into by EOW as well. The Ld. AR submitted that the activities of the trust were genuine and these were conducted in accordance with the objects of the trust and the amount was used for the charitable purpose

SHREE RAM TRUST,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O.,WARD-1(3), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2496/KOL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata22 May 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm ]

Section 11(1)Section 11(1)(a)Section 11(1)(d)

addition by to Rs. 2,95,000/-. Aggrieved, the assessee is before us. 4. After hearing both parties, it is noted that appellant is a charitable trust registered u/s. 12A of the Act. The Appellant Trust income

INDIAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE. ,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR-1(1), (EXEMPTION), KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 933/KOL/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata22 Dec 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpalyadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar]

Section 11Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 25

trust, earmarked for such charitable or religious purposes. Such 25 per cent of the income or Rs. 10,000, whichever is higher, will also get exempted from income- tax. That exhausts the operation of section 11(1)(a). Then follows sub-section (2) which deals with the question of investment of the balance of accumulated income which has still

INDIAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE,KOLKATA vs. DCIT,CIR-1(1), (EXEMPTION), KOLKATA. , KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 934/KOL/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata22 Dec 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpalyadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar]

Section 11Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 25

trust, earmarked for such charitable or religious purposes. Such 25 per cent of the income or Rs. 10,000, whichever is higher, will also get exempted from income- tax. That exhausts the operation of section 11(1)(a). Then follows sub-section (2) which deals with the question of investment of the balance of accumulated income which has still

THE INSTITUTE OF INDIAN FOUNDRYMEN,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 1(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1123/KOL/2024[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Oct 2024AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm]

Section 11Section 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 263

trust, earmarked for such charitable or religious purposes. Such 25 per cent of the income or Rs. 10,000, whichever is higher, will also get exempted from income-tax. That exhausts the operation of section 11(1)(a). Then follows sub-section (2) which deals with the question of investment of the balance of accumulated income which has still

THE INSTITUTE OF INDIAN FOUNDRYMEN,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD 1(3), EXEMPTION , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 499/KOL/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 Jun 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey]

Section 11Section 12ASection 2(15)

trust, earmarked for such charitable or religious purposes. Such 25 per cent of the income or Rs. 10,000, whichever is higher, will also get exempted from income- tax. That exhausts the operation of section 11(1)(a). Then follows sub-section (2) which deals with the question of investment of the balance of accumulated income which has still

THE INSTITUTE OF INDIA FOUNDRYMEN,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD-1(3),EXEMPT, KOLKATA., KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1230/KOL/2023[2017-18]Status: HeardITAT Kolkata12 Apr 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 11Section 12ASection 2(15)

trust, earmarked for such charitable or religious purposes. Such 25 per cent of the income or Rs. 10,000, whichever is higher, will also get exempted from income-tax. That exhausts the operation of section 11(1)(a). Then follows sub-section (2) which deals with the question of investment of the balance of accumulated income which has still

THE INSTITUTE OF INDIAN FOUNDRYMEN ,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD- 1(3), EXEMPT, KOLKATA. , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1228/KOL/2023[2015-16]Status: HeardITAT Kolkata12 Apr 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 11Section 12ASection 2(15)

trust, earmarked for such charitable or religious purposes. Such 25 per cent of the income or Rs. 10,000, whichever is higher, will also get exempted from income-tax. That exhausts the operation of section 11(1)(a). Then follows sub-section (2) which deals with the question of investment of the balance of accumulated income which has still

THE INSTITUTE OF INDIAN FOUNDRYMEN. ,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD-1(3), EXEMPT, KOLKATA. , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1229/KOL/2023[2016-17]Status: HeardITAT Kolkata12 Apr 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 11Section 12ASection 2(15)

trust, earmarked for such charitable or religious purposes. Such 25 per cent of the income or Rs. 10,000, whichever is higher, will also get exempted from income-tax. That exhausts the operation of section 11(1)(a). Then follows sub-section (2) which deals with the question of investment of the balance of accumulated income which has still

THE INSTITUTE OF INDIAN FOUNDRYMEN,KOLKATA vs. ITO,WARD-1(3), EXEMPT, KOLKATA. , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 906/KOL/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata18 Mar 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rajesh Kumar]

Section 11Section 12ASection 2(15)

trust, earmarked for such charitable or religious purposes. Such 25 per cent of the income or Rs. 10,000, whichever is higher, will also get exempted from income-tax. That exhausts the operation of section 11(1)(a). Then follows sub-section (2) which deals with the question of investment of the balance of accumulated income which has still

INDIAN LEATHER TECHNOLOGISTS' ASSOCIATION,KOLKATA vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), KOLKATA , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 1634/KOL/2017[-----]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata11 Jul 2018

Bench: "ी ऐ. ट". वक", "यायीक सद"य एवं/And "ी एम .बालागणेश, लेखा सद"य) [Before Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am]

Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(vi)

trust failed in making expenditure to the extent of 85% of its income, which according to the authority was necessary as per the provision of section 80G(5) of the Act and thus he rejected the assessee’s application seeking approval u/s. 80G of the Act. We thus note that there is absolutely no allegation

DR. B.G. MEMORIAL TRUST,KOLKATA vs. CIT, (EXEMPTION), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, assessee’s appeal stands allowed

ITA 516/KOL/2017[]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Sept 2017

Bench: Shri Aby.T Varkey & Shri Waseem Ahmeddr. B.G. Memorial Trust V/S. Cit (Exemption), 10B, Middleton Row, 6Th 6/1 Sarat Chatterjee Avenue, Kolkat-29 Floor, Kolkata-71 [Pan No.Aaatd 5235 A]

Section 12ASection 133A

charitable trust with corruption by the public servants. In a very recent case of State of Karnataka vis. Selvi J. Jayalalita. Honble Supreme Court stated the following: “Any interpretation of the provisions of such law has to be essentially purposive in furtherance of its mission and not in retrogression thereof. Innovative nuances of evidential inadequacies processual infirmities and interpretational subtleties

M/S BIMLADEVI DHARAMPRAKASH JAN-KALYAN NIDHI,KOLKATA vs. CIT(EXEMPTION) KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee, is allowed

ITA 10/KOL/2017[]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata18 Oct 2017

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.10/Kol/2017 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: ……….. M/S. Bimladevi Vs. C.I.T(Exemptions),Kolkata Dharamprakash Jan- Kalyan Nidhi 17, Ganesh Chandra Avenue, 10B, Middleton Row, 6Th 6Th Floor, Kolkata – 700 013. Floor, Kolkata – 700 071. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaatb5499A (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellantby :Shri S. M. Surana, Advocate Respondent By :Md. Usman, Cit, Dr सुनवाईक"तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 16/08/2017 घोषणाक"तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 18/10/2017 आदेश / O R D E R Per Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Am: The Captioned Appeal Filed By The Assessee, Is Directed Against An Order Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Kolkata Under Section 12Aa(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961,( Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’), Dated 23.12.2016. 2. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1. For That The Order Of The Ld. Cit Is Arbitrary & Bad In Law.

For Appellant: Shri S. M. Surana, AdvocateFor Respondent: Md. Usman, CIT, DR
Section 12ASection 133A

Income Tax Officer (Exemptions), Ward-1(1), Kolkata on 11.09.2015. During the course of Survey operation it transpired that M/s. Govind Ram Goel Charitable Trust was in the business of money laundering M/s. Bimladevi Dharamprakash Jan- Kalyan Nidhi and providing accommodation entry to different individuals and organizations. The entry was provided by way of accepting donations and returning the same

ITO(E), WD-1(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. PANCHAJANYA TRUST, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is allowed and the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1994/KOL/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata01 Oct 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.1841/Kol/2017 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2014-15)

For Appellant: Shri S.K. Das, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Robin Chowdhury, DR
Section 11Section 11(1)(d)Section 12(1)Section 143(3)

Charitable Fund Trust (2016) 67 Taxmann.com 160 (Karnataka High Court), and CIT(Exemption), Bangalore vs. The Karnataka Law Society (2017),wherein,in sum and substance, it was held as follows: “24. The Constitution Bench of the Apex Court in Vatika Township (P.) Ltd.'s case (supra), had laid down general principles concerning retrospectivity in Paragraphs

PANCHAJANYA TRUST,KOLKATA vs. ITO, (EXEMPTION), WARD-1(4), KOKLATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is allowed and the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1841/KOL/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata01 Oct 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.1841/Kol/2017 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2014-15)

For Appellant: Shri S.K. Das, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Robin Chowdhury, DR
Section 11Section 11(1)(d)Section 12(1)Section 143(3)

Charitable Fund Trust (2016) 67 Taxmann.com 160 (Karnataka High Court), and CIT(Exemption), Bangalore vs. The Karnataka Law Society (2017),wherein,in sum and substance, it was held as follows: “24. The Constitution Bench of the Apex Court in Vatika Township (P.) Ltd.'s case (supra), had laid down general principles concerning retrospectivity in Paragraphs