BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “capital gains”+ Section 69Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi119Jaipur116Mumbai93Bangalore38Pune33Chandigarh30Chennai20Indore19Rajkot15Amritsar12Surat11Raipur10Cochin10Kolkata7Ahmedabad6Jodhpur5Hyderabad2SC2Karnataka1Nagpur1Jabalpur1Guwahati1Ranchi1Allahabad1Kerala1Visakhapatnam1Lucknow1

Key Topics

Section 25011Section 271A6Section 142A6Section 1474Penalty4Addition to Income4Section 272A(1)(d)3Section 41(1)3Section 693Natural Justice

BIMLA DEVI AGRAWAL,KOLKATA vs. A.C.I.T./D.C.I.T., CIRCLE - 34, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1690/KOL/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 Oct 2025AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153Section 155(15)Section 250

capital gain by taking the full value of the consideration to be the value as so revised in such appeal or revision or reference; and the provisions of section 154 shall, so far as may be, apply thereto, and the period of four years shall be reckoned from the end of the previous year in which the order revising

3
Condonation of Delay3
Section 142(1)2

SUKLA BANERJEE,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD 22(2),, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1987/KOL/2025[2022-2023]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata23 Dec 2025AY 2022-2023

Bench: SHRI RAJESH KUMAR (Accountant Member), SHRI PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Soumitra Choudhury, &For Respondent: ShriPradip Kumar Biswas, Sr.DR
Section 142ASection 143(2)Section 153(1)Section 69

Capital Gain and total income based on the report of the DVO based on a reference made u/s.142A of the Act, is unsustainable because, power to make a reference u/s.142A of the Act envisages estimation of the value of any investment referred to in Section 69, 69A or 69B

KRISHNA CHANDRA DAS,ALIPORE, TWENTY FOUR PARGANAS vs. I.T.O., WARD- 25(1),, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 2987/KOL/2025[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata17 Apr 2026AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 147Section 250Section 271A

sections for the Assessment Year 2019-20. 3. That on the facts and circumstances of the case the Ld. C.I.T (A) erred in rejecting the Appellant's prayer for condonation of delay, which was based on wrong interpretation of date of service or communication of the Order and thereby in non-admitting the Appeal and denying justice to the Appellant

KRISHNA CHANDRA DAS,ALIPORE, TWENTY FOUR PARGANAS SOUTH vs. I.T.O., WARD - 25(1),, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 2989/KOL/2025[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata17 Apr 2026AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 147Section 250Section 271A

sections for the Assessment Year 2019-20. 3. That on the facts and circumstances of the case the Ld. C.I.T (A) erred in rejecting the Appellant's prayer for condonation of delay, which was based on wrong interpretation of date of service or communication of the Order and thereby in non-admitting the Appeal and denying justice to the Appellant

KRISHNA CHANDRA DAS,ALIPORE, TWENTY FOUR PARGANAS SOUTH vs. I.T.O., WARD - 25(1),, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 2988/KOL/2025[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata17 Apr 2026AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 147Section 250Section 271A

sections for the Assessment Year 2019-20. 3. That on the facts and circumstances of the case the Ld. C.I.T (A) erred in rejecting the Appellant's prayer for condonation of delay, which was based on wrong interpretation of date of service or communication of the Order and thereby in non-admitting the Appeal and denying justice to the Appellant

KRISHNA CHANDRA DAS,TWENTY FOUR PARGANAS SOUTH vs. I.T.O., WARD - 25(1),, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1804/KOL/2025[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Dec 2025AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubeyassessment Year: 2019-20 Krishna Chandra Das..……………..………………….……….……….……Appellant Ramkrishnanagar Laskarpur, Alipore, 24 Parganas (S), W.B - 743515. [Pan: Ajapd6700B] Vs. Ito, Ward-25(1), Kolkata………….…………………….....……...…..…..Respondent Appearances By: Shri B. B. Payra, Advocate, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Dipu Koley, Addl. Cit-Sr. Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : October 27, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : December 02, 2025 Order Per Pradip Kumar Choubey: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 24.06.2025 Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As “The Act”) For The Assessment Year 2019–20. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Had Not Filed Original Return Of Income For The A.Y. 2019-20. In The Absence Of Voluntary Compliance, The Assessing Officer Initiated Reassessment Proceedings U/S 147 R.W.S. 144 Of The Act By Making Following Additions:

Section 142(1)Section 147Section 15Section 250Section 272A(1)(d)Section 45Section 56Section 69ASection 69B

Capital Gain u/s 45 amounting to Rs. 2,25,001/-. ii. Income from other sources u/s 56 amounting to Rs. 84,644/-. iii. Salary Received u/s 15 amounting to Rs. 34,64,292/-. iv. Unexplained Investment U/s 69B amounting to Rs.70,79,999/-. Krishna Chandra Das v. Unexplained Money U/s 69A amounting to Rs. 19,64,920/- 2.1 During

DCIT, CIRCLE - 3(1), KOLKATA , KOLKATA vs. M/S. ATIBIR HI-TECH PVT. LTD., , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue as well as cross- objection of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1747/KOL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 Mar 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Vice-(Kz) & Shri A.T. Varkey, Jm] Assessment Year: 2013-14 D.C.I.T, Circle – 3(1) Kolkata...........................................................................................Appellant P-7, Chowringhee Squar, 4Th Floor, Aayakar Bhawan, Room No. 19, Kolkata – 700 069. M/S. Atibir Hi-Tech Pvt. Ltd. …………………………………………………….......................Respondent Block-7B, 7Th Floor, Abdul Hamid Street, Kolkata – 700 069. [Pan : Aabca 4466 C] C.O. No. 118/Kol/2017 (Arising Out Of Ita No. 1747/Kol/2017) Assessment Year: 2013-14 M/S. Atibir Hi-Tech Pvt. Ltd. ……………………………………………………..................Cross-Objector Block-7B, 7Th Floor, Abdul Hamid Street, Kolkata – 700 069. [Pan : Aabca 4466 C] D.C.I.T, Circle – 3(1) Kolkata.......................................................................................Respondent P-7, Chowringhee Squar, 4Th Floor, Aayakar Bhawan, Room No. 19, Kolkata – 700 069. Appearances By: Shri Radhey Shyam, Cit, Dr Appearing On Behalf Of The Revenue Shri D.S. Damle, Fca Appearing On Behalf Of The Assessee Date Of Concluding The Hearing : January 16, 2019 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : March 29, 2019 Order Per P.M. Jagtap, Vice-(Kz) This Appeal Is Preferred By The Revenue Against The Order Of Ld. Cit (A) – 11, Kolkata Dated 04.042017 & The Same Is Being Disposed Of Along With The Cross-Objection Filed By The Assessee Being C.O. No. 118/Kol/2017. 2 Ita No. 1747/Kol/2017 & C.O. No. 118/Kol/2017 Assessment Year 2013-14 M/S. Atibir Hi-Tech Pvt. Ltd.

Section 41(1)

Section 115BBE does not allow set off of income assessed as cash credit u/s 68 against the loss under any other head as per the provisions of Sec. 71. The legislature in all its wisdom has decided not to allow set off of loss under any provisions of this Act w.e.f. 01.04.2017 in computing the income as per the provisions