BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “capital gains”+ Section 44Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi32Mumbai27Dehradun10Guwahati8Chandigarh8Kolkata7Ahmedabad3Bangalore2Indore1Chennai1SC1Surat1Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)18Section 2638Section 80I8Section 111A5Addition to Income4Section 50C3Reassessment3Deduction3Section 53A2Revision u/s 263

ITO, WARD - 42(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. SHRI SUSHIL SARKAR, KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 518/KOL/2011[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata06 Nov 2015AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year :2005-06

Section 143(3)Section 2(47)Section 22Section 27Section 50CSection 53A

44D, M.C. Garden Road, Rabindra Sarani, Dum Dum, Kolkata-700 030 Podder Court, Kolkata [PAN No.ALKPS 7819 J] .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Shri Niloy Baran Som, JCIT-SR-DR अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/By Appellant Smt. Varsha Jalan, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से/By Respondent 01-10-2015 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing 06-11-2015 घोषणा

LALITA STEEL INDUSTRIES (P) LTD,KOLKATA vs. J.C.I.T (OSD) UNDER CIT - IV, KOLKATA

2

In the result, appeal filed by assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 539/KOL/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata04 Dec 2015AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year :2009-10

Section 111ASection 143(3)

capital gain is charged to tax at special rate and no expenditure is allowable for deduction against that income. Accordingly, AO disallowed the expenses claimed by assessee for an amount of ₹52,36,580/- and added to the total income of assessee. 4. Aggrieved assessee preferred appeal before Ld. CIT(A) who uphold the action of Assessing Officer by observing

THE TIMKEN COMPANY,KOLKATA vs. THE DDIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION - 3(1),KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result appeals for AY 2004-05 to 2007-08 are allowed

ITA 1268/KOL/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 Nov 2017AY 2005-06

Bench: Hon’Ble Sri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh Am]

For Appellant: Shri Ravi Sharma, ARFor Respondent: Shri N.B.Som, Addl. CIT, Sr.DR

44D and an option to the assessee to avail benefit of those sections should be given. The AAR did not agree with the aforesaid decision and preferred to hold that the principle laid down in the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Sanyasi Rao (supra) cannot be read into or applied in the context

THE TIMKEN COMPANY,KOLKATA vs. A.D.I.T (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) - II,KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result appeals for AY 2004-05 to 2007-08 are allowed

ITA 2139/KOL/2013[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 Nov 2017AY 2004-05

Bench: Hon’Ble Sri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh Am]

For Appellant: Shri Ravi Sharma, ARFor Respondent: Shri N.B.Som, Addl. CIT, Sr.DR

44D and an option to the assessee to avail benefit of those sections should be given. The AAR did not agree with the aforesaid decision and preferred to hold that the principle laid down in the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Sanyasi Rao (supra) cannot be read into or applied in the context

ADIT(IT)-3(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. THE TIMKEN COMPANY, KOLKATA

In the result appeals for AY 2004-05 to 2007-08 are allowed

ITA 387/KOL/2010[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 Nov 2017AY 2002-03

Bench: Hon’Ble Sri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh Am]

For Appellant: Shri Ravi Sharma, ARFor Respondent: Shri N.B.Som, Addl. CIT, Sr.DR

44D and an option to the assessee to avail benefit of those sections should be given. The AAR did not agree with the aforesaid decision and preferred to hold that the principle laid down in the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Sanyasi Rao (supra) cannot be read into or applied in the context

M/S. SINGHAL ENTERPRISES PVT LTD.,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T., C.C. - 4(1), KOLKATA., KOLKATA

In the result, the both the appeals of the assessee ( in ITA No

ITA 1071/KOL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 Feb 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.1071 & 1072/Kol/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years:2013-14 &2014-15)

For Appellant: Shri A.K. Tulsiyan, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ram Bilash Meena, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 80I

capital of the business and accordingly interest on Bank O/D should be a business expenditure. Therefore, in the instant case interest on Bank O/D should have been adjusted with business income.Gross Total Income of the assessee company before allowing deduction u/s 80IA was assessed at Rs. 11,79,50,755/-. Deduction u/s 80IA allowed to the assessee company

M/S. SINGHAL ENTERPRISES PVT LTD.,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T., C.C. - 4(1), KOLKATA., KOLKATA

In the result, the both the appeals of the assessee ( in ITA No

ITA 1072/KOL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 Feb 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.1071 & 1072/Kol/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years:2013-14 &2014-15)

For Appellant: Shri A.K. Tulsiyan, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ram Bilash Meena, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 80I

capital of the business and accordingly interest on Bank O/D should be a business expenditure. Therefore, in the instant case interest on Bank O/D should have been adjusted with business income.Gross Total Income of the assessee company before allowing deduction u/s 80IA was assessed at Rs. 11,79,50,755/-. Deduction u/s 80IA allowed to the assessee company