BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “capital gains”+ Section 43Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka51Mumbai51Ahmedabad37Delhi26Bangalore15Hyderabad8Chennai7Kolkata6Cochin4SC4Jaipur3Cuttack2Visakhapatnam2Surat2Pune2Jodhpur1Indore1Patna1Rajkot1Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 12A6Section 114Section 104Addition to Income4Exemption3Reassessment3Section 1482Section 80G2Depreciation2

VIDYA BHARATI SOCIETY FOR EDUCATION & SCIENTIFIC ADVANCEMENT,KOLKATA vs. ACIT(EXEMPTION) CIRCLE - 1(1), KOLKATA , KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 2398/KOL/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Jan 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap(Kz) & Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(1)

gains of business ahll be computed in accordance with section 30 to section 43C. That, section 32(1) of the Act provides for depreciation in respect of 12 ITA No. 2397-2398/Kol/2017 Vidya Bharati Society for Education & Scientific Advancement, AYs: 2010-11 & 2014-15 building, plant and machinery owned by the assessee and used for business purposes. It further

JHA EDUCATIONAL TRUST ,KOLKATA vs. ITO(EXEMPTION), WARD - 1(1), KOLKATA , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 320/KOL/2018[2009-10]Status: Disposed
ITAT Kolkata
29 Nov 2019
AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap(Kz) & Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

Section 10Section 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 148Section 80GSection 80G(5)

gains of business ahll be computed in accordance with section 30 to section 43C. That, section 32(1) of the Act provides for depreciation in respect of building, plant and machinery owned by the assessee and used for business purposes. It further provides for deduction subject to section 34. In that matter also, a similar argument, as in the present

M P BIRLA FOUNDATION EDUCATION SOCIETY ,KOLKATA vs. DCIT(E) - 1(1), KOLKATA

In the result, appeals of both the assessees are allowed

ITA 1766/KOL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata17 Mar 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Girish Agrawal]

Section 12ASection 143(3)

gains of business shall be computed in accordance with section 30 to section 43C. That, section 32(1) of the Act provides for depreciation in respect of building, plant and machinery owned by the assessee and used for business purposes. It further provides for deduction subject to section 34. In that matter also, a similar argument, as in the present

ADIT(IT)-3(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. THE TIMKEN COMPANY, KOLKATA

In the result appeals for AY 2004-05 to 2007-08 are allowed

ITA 387/KOL/2010[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 Nov 2017AY 2002-03

Bench: Hon’Ble Sri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh Am]

For Appellant: Shri Ravi Sharma, ARFor Respondent: Shri N.B.Som, Addl. CIT, Sr.DR

43C should also be read in s. 44D and an option to the assessee to avail benefit of those sections should be given. The AAR did not agree with the aforesaid decision and preferred to hold that the principle laid down in the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Sanyasi Rao (supra) cannot be read

THE TIMKEN COMPANY,KOLKATA vs. THE DDIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION - 3(1),KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result appeals for AY 2004-05 to 2007-08 are allowed

ITA 1268/KOL/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 Nov 2017AY 2005-06

Bench: Hon’Ble Sri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh Am]

For Appellant: Shri Ravi Sharma, ARFor Respondent: Shri N.B.Som, Addl. CIT, Sr.DR

43C should also be read in s. 44D and an option to the assessee to avail benefit of those sections should be given. The AAR did not agree with the aforesaid decision and preferred to hold that the principle laid down in the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Sanyasi Rao (supra) cannot be read

THE TIMKEN COMPANY,KOLKATA vs. A.D.I.T (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) - II,KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result appeals for AY 2004-05 to 2007-08 are allowed

ITA 2139/KOL/2013[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 Nov 2017AY 2004-05

Bench: Hon’Ble Sri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh Am]

For Appellant: Shri Ravi Sharma, ARFor Respondent: Shri N.B.Som, Addl. CIT, Sr.DR

43C should also be read in s. 44D and an option to the assessee to avail benefit of those sections should be given. The AAR did not agree with the aforesaid decision and preferred to hold that the principle laid down in the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Sanyasi Rao (supra) cannot be read