BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

11 results for “capital gains”+ Section 40Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai204Delhi106Jaipur43Bangalore40Hyderabad33Raipur33Chennai32Ahmedabad25Chandigarh21Indore16Visakhapatnam15Kolkata11Cochin8Pune8Lucknow7Surat5Patna3Jodhpur2Amritsar2Cuttack2Dehradun2Nagpur1Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 25011Addition to Income10Section 1479Section 688Condonation of Delay6Deduction6Section 40A(3)4Section 143(3)4Section 43B4

MEGA ENGINEERS & BUILDERS,PORT BLAIR vs. DCIT, CIR. 3(2) , PORT BLAIR

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 312/KOL/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Oct 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar&Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey]

Section 194C

40a(ia) of the Act have wrongly been invoked by the AO. Similarly the Ld. CIT(A) simply affirmed the addition by holding that the assessee has failed to deduct tax at source as provided in the Act. We find support from the decision of Co-ordinate Bench of Kolkata in the case of ACIT vs Uco Bank

BARDHAMAN DISHARI SHRAMIK O JANAALYAN SAMABAY SAMITY LIMITED,BURDWAN vs. A.C.I.T., CIRCLE - 1, BURDWAN, BURDWAN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1722/KOL/2024[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Mar 2025AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar&Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey]

Limitation/Time-bar4
Section 1483
Section 56(2)(x)3
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 40aSection 80P

40a(ia) of the Act. Further addition of Rs. 5,000/- on account of donation was also deleted but balance additions were confirmed. Aggrieved by the said order the assessee preferred an appeal before the ITAT. The ITAT in its order dated 03.03.2015 set aside the case back to the file by the Ld. CIT(A) with the following comments

SRI RUDRAPRASAD MANDAL,MEDINIPUR vs. DCIT, CIR. 27(1), HALDIA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 702/KOL/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata08 Oct 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice- & Shri Rajesh Kumar]

Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 40A(3)

40A(3) and(ii) sundry creditors mismatch of Rs. 2,00,000/- after making the enquiries which were apparently outside the scope of limited scrutiny as the AO has not converted the limited scrutiny into complete scrutiny with prior approval of the Ld. PCIT which in our opinion is in incomplete disregard of the Instruction No. 5/2016 issued by CBDT

THE WEST BENGAL POWER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T.,CIRCLE-4(2), KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 335/KOL/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Jan 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma

Section 250Section 43B

capital work-in- progress and was never charged to the profit and loss account and, therefore, the provisions of section 43B of the Act are not applicable. We accordingly set aside the order of the ld. CIT(Appeals) and direct the ld. Assessing Officer to delete the disallowance of Rs. 17,29,58,525/-. Consequently ground no. 1 is allowed

THE WEST BENGAL POWER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T.,CIRCLE-4(2), KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 336/KOL/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma

Section 250Section 43B

capital work-in- progress and was never charged to the profit and loss account and, therefore, the provisions of section 43B of the Act are not applicable. We accordingly set aside the order of the ld. CIT(Appeals) and direct the ld. Assessing Officer to delete the disallowance of Rs. 17,29,58,525/-. Consequently ground no. 1 is allowed

THE WEST BENGAL POWER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T.,CIRCLE-4(2), KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 333/KOL/2020[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Jan 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma

Section 250Section 43B

capital work-in- progress and was never charged to the profit and loss account and, therefore, the provisions of section 43B of the Act are not applicable. We accordingly set aside the order of the ld. CIT(Appeals) and direct the ld. Assessing Officer to delete the disallowance of Rs. 17,29,58,525/-. Consequently ground no. 1 is allowed

THE WEST BENGAL POWER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T.,CIRCLE-4(2), KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 334/KOL/2020[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Jan 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma

Section 250Section 43B

capital work-in- progress and was never charged to the profit and loss account and, therefore, the provisions of section 43B of the Act are not applicable. We accordingly set aside the order of the ld. CIT(Appeals) and direct the ld. Assessing Officer to delete the disallowance of Rs. 17,29,58,525/-. Consequently ground no. 1 is allowed

M/S. DELIGHTED HOLDINGS (P) LTD. ,KOLKATA vs. DCIR, CIR-8(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 624/KOL/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata08 Jan 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 143(1)Section 147Section 148

Capital Gain earned in a dubious manner, 8. The details of information have’ been discussed -in the body of the assessment order. Keeping in view the above facts necessary approvals for reopening the case were taken from PCIT-3, Kolkata [the competent authority] as per Act. Notice u/s 148 of the 1. T. Act, 1961 was issued to the assessee

PANKAJ MUKHERJEE,DURGAPUR vs. D.C.I.T., CIRCLE - 1, , DURGAPUR

In the result, the appeal is allowed

ITA 2294/KOL/2024[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 Jan 2024AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm Dcit, Circle-1, Pankaj Mukherjee Aaykar Bhavan, Aykar Bithi, 1/9 Debinagar, Beniachity, City Centre, Durgapur, Vs. Kolkata-713213, West Bengal West Bengal 713216 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Ajopm7641Q Assessee By : Shri Sunil Surana, Ar Revenue By : Shri Rajat Datta, Dr Date Of Hearing: 27.01.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 31.01.2025

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Surana, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rajat Datta, DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148(2)Section 40A(3)Section 68

section 147 of the Act dated 30.12.2017. Pertinent to state that the only addition made in in the assessment order which was subject matter of the reasons recorded was in respect of unexplained cash credit u/s 68 of the Act of ₹16,98,126/-, for which the ld. AO has noted in the reasons recorded that the assessee has deposited

TAMAL KUNDU,KOLKATA vs. A.C.I.T., CIRCLE - 37, , KOLKATA

The appeal of the assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 1797/KOL/2024[2018-2019]Status: HeardITAT Kolkata20 Nov 2024AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Sanjay Awasthii.T.A. No. 1797/Kol/2024 Assessment Year: 2018-19

For Appellant: Shri Anup Sinha, ARFor Respondent: Shri P.P. Barman, Addl. CIT
Section 2(47)(vi)Section 234ASection 250Section 56(2)(X)Section 56(2)(x)

40A, W.C. Banerjee Street, Girish National E-Assessment Centre, Park, Kolkata-700006, West Delhi, ACIT, Circle-37, 3, Bengal government place, [PAN : ALQPK8796A] (West), Kolkata-700001, West Bengal अपीलार्थी/ (Appellant) प्रत्‍यर्थी/ (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Anup Sinha, AR Revenue by : Shri P.P. Barman, Addl. CIT सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 24.10.2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 20.11.2024 आदेश

ITO, WARD-1(1), KOLKATA vs. M/S GEMINI COMMERCE, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 14/KOL/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Mar 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble & Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 14/Kol/2021 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Income Tax Officer, Ward - 11(1), M/S. Gemini Commerce Pvt. Ltd. Kolkata Vs 8A, Brown Field Row Kolkata - 700027 [Pan : Aadcg0842J] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Soumitra Choudhury, Advocate Revenue By : Shri Ranu Biswas, Addl. Cit, D/R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 01/02/2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 15/03/2023 आदेश/O R D E R Per Dr. Manish Borad: This Is The Appeal Preferred By The Revenue Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-4, Kolkata (Hereinafter Referred To As The Ld. Cit(A)”], Passed U/S 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter The ‘Act’), Dated 21/09/2022 For The Assessment Year 2014-15. 2. The Registry Has Pointed Out That There Is A Delay Of Six (6) Days In Filing Of This Appeal In Time Before The Tribunal. The Assessee Has Filed A Petition For Condonation Of Delay Stating The Reasons Of Delay. After Perusing The Same, We Find That The Assessee Was Prevented By Sufficient Cause From Filing The Appeal In Time Before The Tribunal. Hence, The Delay Is Condoned & The Appeal Is Admitted. 3. The Revenue Has Filed The Following Grounds Of Appeal:- “1. Whether On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case, Ld. Cit(A) Was Justified In Deleting The Addition Of Rs.5,61,00,000/- Made By The Assessing Officer On Account Of Sale Of Unquoted Shares In The Course Of

For Appellant: Shri Soumitra Choudhury, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Ranu Biswas, Addl. CIT, D/R
Section 143(2)Section 250Section 68

40A(3) of the Act. v) that when assessee has shown an amount of Rs.25,10,000/- as sale proceeds of shares as income, there is no ground for making the same as addition in the income which would amount to double addition. vi) that the books of account maintained by assessee have never been disputed