BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “capital gains”+ Section 292Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi152Mumbai86Chennai78Bangalore62Jaipur56Hyderabad47Pune21Indore18Amritsar16Surat15Ahmedabad10Rajkot10Nagpur9Cochin8Dehradun6Jodhpur4Kolkata4Allahabad2Telangana1Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 685Long Term Capital Gains4Section 1323Capital Gains3Addition to Income3Search & Seizure3Section 132(4)2Section 1482Undisclosed Income

CHAINROOP BOHRA.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT CC - XXVII/CAL., KOLKATA

In the result, all these four appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 24/KOL/2013[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Oct 2015AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

Section 131Section 132Section 132(4)Section 143(1)Section 148

capital gain. Now, as per the provisions of section 292C, the first presumption is that the said seized papers I.T.A

M/S GANESHMULL BIJAY SINGH BAID (HUF),KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T CC - XXVII,KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the respective assessee are allowed

2
Unexplained Cash Credit2
ITA 544/KOL/2013[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata04 Dec 2015AY 2005-06

Bench: : Shri M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: Shri Ravi Tulsiyan, FCA, ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Sujit Kumar Das, JCIT, ld.Sr. DR
Section 132Section 68

capital gains by paying cash money to Shri Narendra Shyamsukha, the learned CIT(A) glossed over the facts that the neither Shri Narendra Shyamsukha could adduce any evidence about receipt of cash money from the appellant nor could the AO get any evidence in that regard and also that the actual broker viz. Ahila Commercial P.Ltd had completely denied

PREMLATA BAID,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T CC - XXVII,KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the respective assessees are allowed

ITA 543/KOL/2013[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Dec 2015AY 2005-06

Bench: : Shri M. Balaganesh

Section 132Section 68

capital gains by paying cash money to Shri Narendra Shyamsukha, the learned CIT(A) glossed over the facts that the neither Shri Narendra Shyamsukha could adduce any evidence about receipt of cash money from the appellant nor could the AO get any evidence in that regard and also that the actual broker viz. Ahila Commercial P.Ltd had completely denied

DCIT,CIRCLE-1, SILIGURI, SILIGURI vs. M/S ANAND KUMAR AGARWAL, SILIGURI

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 244/KOL/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata08 Jun 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Sainiassessment Year :2011-12 Dcit Circle-1, V/S. Anand Kumar Agarwal Aayakar Bhawan, C/O Sky Wheels Pvt. Ltd. Paribahan Nagar, Paribahan Nagar, Matigar, Matigara, Siliguri, Pin Siliguri-734010 734010 [Pan No.Acrpa 8801 A] .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Md. Usman, Cit-Dr अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/By Appellant Shri Ravi Tulsiyan, Fca ""यथ" क" ओर से/By Respondent 31-05-2018 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing 08-06-2018 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement आदेश /O R D E R Per S.S.Godara:- This Revenue’S Appeal For Assessment Year 2011-12 Challenges Correctness Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-Siliguri’S Order Dated 07.12.2016 In Case No.133/Cit(A)/Slg/2015-16, Reversing The Assessing Officer’S Action Making Undisclosed On-Money Addition Of ₹1,10,00,000/-, Involving Proceedings U/S 143(3) R.W 153C Of The Income Tax Act, 1961; In Short ‘The Act’. 2. We Come To The Relevant Facts Pertaining To The Above Sole Issue. This Assessee Is Admittedly The Legal Heir Of Late Shri Bhanwarlal Agarwal. The Said Predecessor In Interest Co-Owned Capital Asset In Question Along With S/Sh R.K. Agarwal, Hanumnmal, Mahendra & Pawan Bansal(S). All The Said Joint Owners Sold The Relevant Asset On 21.01.2011 To M/S Patron Vinimay Pvt. Ltd. For ₹3,58,25,000/- Received Through Banking Channel. The Assessee’S

Section 132(4)Section 143(3)Section 153C

capital gains as per said sale considerations received through banking channel of ₹1,14,00,000/- (supra). The Assessing Officer framed his regular assessment on 29.01.2016 adding cash component of ₹1,10,00,000/- by placing strong reliance of Shri R.K. Agarwal search statement (supra) supported by corresponding incrementing material seized. He concluded that same formed sufficient evidence to make