ACIT, CIR-I, SILIGURI, SILIGURI vs. MRS HARMEET KAUR, SILIGURI
In the result, the appeal of the revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 1482/KOL/2014[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata24 Jul 2017AY 2011-12
Bench: Hon’Ble Shri A.T.Varkey, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am ] I.T.A No. 1482/Kol/2014 Assessment Year : 2011-12 A.C.I.T., Cir-1, -Vs- Mrs. Harmeet Kaur Siliguri (Pan : Afupk 9262 M] (Respondent) (Appellant) For The Appellant : G. Mallikarjuna, Cit, Dr For The Respondent : Shri Subhash Agarwal, Advocate Date Of Hearing : 25.05.2017. Date Of Pronouncement : 24.07.2017 Order
For Appellant: G. Mallikarjuna, CIT, DRFor Respondent: Shri Subhash Agarwal, Advocate
Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(3)Section 50CSection 54FSection 54F(4)
9,60,80,616/- as against Rs
6,00,00,000/- and after giving deduction towards indexed cost of acquisition at Rs
1,41,31,137/-, he computed long term capital gains at Rs 8,19,49,479/-.
4. The ld. CIT(A) observed that the capital gains account was opened by the assessee on 28.2.2010 which was informed
