BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

60 results for “capital gains”+ Section 12Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai208Delhi194Bangalore121Ahmedabad89Jaipur62Kolkata60Chennai52Hyderabad45Pune37Calcutta34Indore33Visakhapatnam17Karnataka16Chandigarh15Lucknow15Cuttack10Agra8Nagpur8Surat7Raipur7Ranchi6Amritsar6Rajkot4Allahabad4Dehradun3Cochin3Telangana3Jabalpur2Panaji2SC2Patna1Andhra Pradesh1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)38Section 1134Exemption32Section 26331Section 12A27Section 2(15)24Section 10(38)22Section 35(1)(ii)15Section 1015Disallowance

NAWAL KISHORE LADHA AND SONS (HUF),KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD - 44(3), KOLKATA , KOLKATA

In the result, appeals of all the captioned assessees are dismissed

ITA 1122/KOL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata17 Oct 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 143(3)

capital gain /trading loss there from. On appeal, ld. CIT(A) confirmed the action of the ld. AO. Aggrieved, assessees are in appeal before the Tribunal. 5. Recently on 14.06.2022, the Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court of Calcutta passed a judgment in the case of Swati Bajaj and others [2022] 139 taxmann.com 352 (Cal) dealing with set of cases with

SHYAM SUNDER BAJAJ ,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD - 36(2) , KOLKATA

In the result, appeals of all the captioned assessees are dismissed

ITA 2552/KOL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata17 Oct 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

Showing 1–20 of 60 · Page 1 of 3

12
Deduction10
Addition to Income10
Section 143(3)

capital gain /trading loss there from. On appeal, ld. CIT(A) confirmed the action of the ld. AO. Aggrieved, assessees are in appeal before the Tribunal. 5. Recently on 14.06.2022, the Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court of Calcutta passed a judgment in the case of Swati Bajaj and others [2022] 139 taxmann.com 352 (Cal) dealing with set of cases with

SHYAM KARIWALA, KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD - 36(2), KOLKATA , KOLKATA

In the result, appeals of all the captioned assessees are dismissed

ITA 341/KOL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata17 Oct 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 143(3)

capital gain /trading loss there from. On appeal, ld. CIT(A) confirmed the action of the ld. AO. Aggrieved, assessees are in appeal before the Tribunal. 5. Recently on 14.06.2022, the Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court of Calcutta passed a judgment in the case of Swati Bajaj and others [2022] 139 taxmann.com 352 (Cal) dealing with set of cases with

SHYAMA AGARWAL,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O.,WARD-3(2), KOLKATA

In the result, appeals of all the captioned assessees are dismissed

ITA 868/KOL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata17 Oct 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 143(3)

capital gain /trading loss there from. On appeal, ld. CIT(A) confirmed the action of the ld. AO. Aggrieved, assessees are in appeal before the Tribunal. 5. Recently on 14.06.2022, the Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court of Calcutta passed a judgment in the case of Swati Bajaj and others [2022] 139 taxmann.com 352 (Cal) dealing with set of cases with

M/S SACHIDA SALES PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O.,WARD-9(4), KOLKATA

In the result, appeals of all the captioned assessees are dismissed

ITA 1673/KOL/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata17 Oct 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 143(3)

capital gain /trading loss there from. On appeal, ld. CIT(A) confirmed the action of the ld. AO. Aggrieved, assessees are in appeal before the Tribunal. 5. Recently on 14.06.2022, the Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court of Calcutta passed a judgment in the case of Swati Bajaj and others [2022] 139 taxmann.com 352 (Cal) dealing with set of cases with

HEMANT KUMAR PATWARI,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O.,WARD-34(3), KOLKATA

In the result, appeals of all the captioned assessees are dismissed

ITA 2093/KOL/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata17 Oct 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 143(3)

capital gain /trading loss there from. On appeal, ld. CIT(A) confirmed the action of the ld. AO. Aggrieved, assessees are in appeal before the Tribunal. 5. Recently on 14.06.2022, the Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court of Calcutta passed a judgment in the case of Swati Bajaj and others [2022] 139 taxmann.com 352 (Cal) dealing with set of cases with

RAJESH KR. MOHTA ,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD - 62(3), , KOLKATA

In the result, appeals of all the captioned assessees are dismissed

ITA 2104/KOL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata17 Oct 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 143(3)

capital gain /trading loss there from. On appeal, ld. CIT(A) confirmed the action of the ld. AO. Aggrieved, assessees are in appeal before the Tribunal. 5. Recently on 14.06.2022, the Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court of Calcutta passed a judgment in the case of Swati Bajaj and others [2022] 139 taxmann.com 352 (Cal) dealing with set of cases with

SATISH KUMAR LAKHMANI,KOLKATA vs. PR.CIT-10, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 260/KOL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata21 Apr 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: "ी जे. सुधाकर रे"ी, लेखा सद"य एवं/And "ी ऐ. टी. वक", "यायीक सद"य) [Before Shri J. Sudhakar Reddy, Am & Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

Section 10(38)Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 263

12A. read with section 24 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act 1992 are predicate offences. • Enforcement Directorate should then be informed to take action under Prevention of Money Laundering Act for the predicate offences. 5.6.1 On perusal of the records available, it is found that the scrip of 'UNNO INDUSTRIES LTD is amongst the 84 penny stocks

ACIT(E), CIR -1, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. WEST BENGAL TRANSPORT WORKERS SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEME, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1406/KOL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 Feb 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Sh. P.M.Jagtap & Sh.S.S.Viswanethra Raviacit(E), Vs West Bengal Transport Workers Circle-1, 5Th Floor, Social Security Scheme, 10B, Middleton Row, 6, Church Lane, 4Th Floor, Kolkata-700071. Kolkata-700001. Pan-Aaalw0133G (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Sh. Sankar Halder, Addl. Cit, Sr.Dr Respondent By Sh.S.M.Surana, Advocate Date Of Hearing 29.11.2018 Date Of Pronouncement 26.02.2019 Order Per S.S. Viswanethra Ravithis Appeal Filed By The Revenue Against The Order Dated 26.04.2016 Passed By Cit(A)-25, Kolkata For Ay 2011-12 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short “Act”).

Section 12Section 2(1)(a)Section 2(24)Section 2(31)Section 3

12A which provided that - in essence, that where registration had been granted to the u/s 12AA, then the provisions of section 11 and 12 [i.e., exemption of income] shall apply for any assessment year preceding the assessment year where registration had been granted. Thus, the appellant was right to have also made claim for relief by this Proviso. Otherwise

RITIN LAKHMANI,KOLKATA vs. PR.CIT - 10 , KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 41/KOL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Nov 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Ms. Madhumita Roy)

Section 10(38)Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 68

12A. read with section 24 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act 1992 are predicate offences. • Enforcement Directorate should then be informed to take action under Prevention of Money Laundering Act for the predicate offences. 5.6.1 On perusal of the records available, it is found that the scrip of 'UNNO INDUSTRIES LTD is amongst the 84 penny stocks

RACHIT LAKHMANI ,KOLKATA vs. PR.CIT - 10, KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 46/KOL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Nov 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Ms. Madhumita Roy)

Section 10(38)Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 68

12A. read with section 24 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act 1992 are predicate offences. • Enforcement Directorate should then be informed to take action under Prevention of Money Laundering Act for the predicate offences. 5.6.1 On perusal of the records available, it is found that the scrip of 'UNNO INDUSTRIES LTD is amongst the 84 penny stocks

JAIKISHAN LAKHMANI ,KOLKATA vs. PR.CIT - 10 , KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 45/KOL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Nov 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Ms. Madhumita Roy)

Section 10(38)Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 68

12A. read with section 24 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act 1992 are predicate offences. • Enforcement Directorate should then be informed to take action under Prevention of Money Laundering Act for the predicate offences. 5.6.1 On perusal of the records available, it is found that the scrip of 'UNNO INDUSTRIES LTD is amongst the 84 penny stocks

RAVISH LAKHMANI ,KOLKATA vs. PR.CIT - 10 , KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 47/KOL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Nov 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Ms. Madhumita Roy)

Section 10(38)Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 68

12A. read with section 24 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act 1992 are predicate offences. • Enforcement Directorate should then be informed to take action under Prevention of Money Laundering Act for the predicate offences. 5.6.1 On perusal of the records available, it is found that the scrip of 'UNNO INDUSTRIES LTD is amongst the 84 penny stocks

GOPICHAND LAKHMANI ,KOLKATA vs. PR.CIT - 10, KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 43/KOL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Nov 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Ms. Madhumita Roy)

Section 10(38)Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 68

12A. read with section 24 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act 1992 are predicate offences. • Enforcement Directorate should then be informed to take action under Prevention of Money Laundering Act for the predicate offences. 5.6.1 On perusal of the records available, it is found that the scrip of 'UNNO INDUSTRIES LTD is amongst the 84 penny stocks

PRAVESH KUMAR LAKHMANI ,KOLKATA vs. PR.CIT - 10 , KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 42/KOL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Nov 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Ms. Madhumita Roy)

Section 10(38)Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 68

12A. read with section 24 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act 1992 are predicate offences. • Enforcement Directorate should then be informed to take action under Prevention of Money Laundering Act for the predicate offences. 5.6.1 On perusal of the records available, it is found that the scrip of 'UNNO INDUSTRIES LTD is amongst the 84 penny stocks

REETA LAKHMANI,KOLKATA vs. PR.CIT - 10 , KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 44/KOL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Nov 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Ms. Madhumita Roy)

Section 10(38)Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 68

12A. read with section 24 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act 1992 are predicate offences. • Enforcement Directorate should then be informed to take action under Prevention of Money Laundering Act for the predicate offences. 5.6.1 On perusal of the records available, it is found that the scrip of 'UNNO INDUSTRIES LTD is amongst the 84 penny stocks

BRITANNIA INDUSTRIES LTD,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR-7(1), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 461/KOL/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata14 Dec 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 461/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2018-19 Britannia Industries Ltd. Dy. Cit, Circle-7(1), Kolkata 5/1A, Hungerford Street Vs Shakespeare Sarani Kolkata - 700017 [Pan: Aabcb2066P] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Kush Kanodia, A/R Revenue By : Shri Subhendu Datta, Cit, D/R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 19/10/2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 14/12/2023 आदेश/O R D E R Per Dr. Manish Borad: The Above Captioned Appeal Is Directed At The Instance Of The Assessee Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (Hereinafter The “Ld. Cit(A)”) Dt. 24/03/2023, Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act”) For The Assessment Year 2018-19. 2. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal :- “1. For That On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case & In Law, The Ld. Cit(A) Failed To Appreciate That The Appellant Had Suo Moto Computed & Disallowed Sum Of Rs.14,10,610/- Which Inter Alia Included Sum Of Rs.14,19,009/- Computed In Terms Of Rule 8D(2)(Ii) Being 1% Of The Value Of Tax Free Investments & Therefore The Ao Had Factually Erred In Holding That The Aforesaid Voluntary Disallowance Represented Disallowance Offered By Way Of Direct Expenditure U/S 14A Read With Rule 8D(2)(I) & Thereby Wrongly Computed Further Disallowance Of Rs.13,32,000/- In Terms Of Rule 8D(2)(Ii).

For Appellant: Shri Kush Kanodia, A/RFor Respondent: Shri Subhendu Datta, CIT, D/R
Section 115Section 14ASection 250Section 35Section 45Section 80G

capital gain in terms of Section 45(2A) of the Act. This ground is therefore allowed for statistical purposes. 14. Now we take up Ground Nos. 7 & 8 of the appeal, which are against the Ld. CIT(A)’s action confirming the disallowance of deduction claimed u/s 80G of the Act. The facts of the case as noted

SRI GOVINDDEO EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE ,KOLKATA vs. ITO(EXEMPTION) WARD-1(3) , KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 718/KOL/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata30 Jul 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma (Judicial Member), Shri Sanjay Awasthi (Accountant Member)

Section 10Section 10(22)Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 250

12A of the Act, 1961. The assessee did not claim exemption under Section 11 of the Act but under Section 10(23C) (iiiad) of the Act as it is annual receipts during the year was less than Rs. 1 Crore. From the income and expenditure statement the assessee had claimed to have earned following income during the year: a. Dividend

SRI GOVINDDEO EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE,KOLKATA vs. DY.DIT(E)-1, KOLKATA. , KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1156/KOL/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata04 Mar 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2011-12 Sri Govinddeo Educational Ddit, Exemption Circle-1, Institute Kolkata Vs. 78, Syed Amir Ali Avenue, Ballygunge, Kolkata-700019. (Pan: Aabts6053J) (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Akkal Dudhwewala, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Subhro Das, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR
Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)

12A of the Act vide registration No. CIT/S-80/WB-VII of 1982-83 dated 05.02.1983. Assessee did not claim exemption u/s. 11 of the Act but u/s 10(23C)(iiiad) as its annual receipt during the year was less than Rs. 1 Cr. From the income and expenditure statement, the assessee had claimed to have earned the following income during the year

INDIAN LEATHER TECHNOLOGISTS' ASSOCIATION,KOLKATA vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), KOLKATA , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 1634/KOL/2017[-----]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata11 Jul 2018

Bench: "ी ऐ. ट". वक", "यायीक सद"य एवं/And "ी एम .बालागणेश, लेखा सद"य) [Before Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am]

Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(vi)

capital gains in subsequent year, whereas the present assessee is a charitable institution registered u/s. 12A of the Act. The Ld. CIT(E) after considering the assessee’s submission and on perusal of books of account of the assessee found that trust failed in making expenditure to the extent of 85% of its income, which according to the authority