BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

27 results for “capital gains”+ Section 111Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai194Delhi43Kolkata27Bangalore13Chennai12Ahmedabad11Pune10Indore9Hyderabad6Jaipur5Surat4Nagpur3Rajkot2Telangana1Karnataka1Lucknow1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)44Section 111A31Short Term Capital Gains19Section 26317Capital Gains16Long Term Capital Gains13Section 14A10Business Income10Section 1548

DCIT CIR - 6,KOLKATA., KOLKATA vs. M/S K.B. CAPITAL MARKETS LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal by the Assessee is partly allowed, while the appeal by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1882/KOL/2012[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 May 2016AY 2008-2009

Bench: Hon’Ble Sri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Am] I.T.A No. 1882/Kol/2012 Assessment Year : 2008-09

For Appellant: Shri D.S.Damle, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Rajat Subhra. Biswas, CIT(DR) &
Section 10Section 111ASection 14ASection 94(7)

111A 264,04,050.00 TAXABLE INCOME 490,61,546.00” 2 M/s.K.B.Capital Markets Ltd. A.Yr.2008-09 4. The AO analyzed the transaction which gave rise to long term capital gain and short term capital gain declared by the assessee in the return of income. He analysed the duration of holding, frequency of transactions and conduct of the assessee and came

Showing 1–20 of 27 · Page 1 of 2

Addition to Income8
Section 143(1)7
Section 1477

KB CAPITAL MARKETS (P) LTD.,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I,.T CIR - 6 , KOLKATA., KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal by the Assessee is partly allowed, while the appeal by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1726/KOL/2012[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 May 2016AY 2008-2009

Bench: Hon’Ble Sri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Am] I.T.A No. 1882/Kol/2012 Assessment Year : 2008-09

For Appellant: Shri D.S.Damle, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Rajat Subhra. Biswas, CIT(DR) &
Section 10Section 111ASection 14ASection 94(7)

111A 264,04,050.00 TAXABLE INCOME 490,61,546.00” 2 M/s.K.B.Capital Markets Ltd. A.Yr.2008-09 4. The AO analyzed the transaction which gave rise to long term capital gain and short term capital gain declared by the assessee in the return of income. He analysed the duration of holding, frequency of transactions and conduct of the assessee and came

RAGUVALIKA TRADING PVT LTD ( SINCE MERGED WITH M.M.MURARKA SHARE & SECURITIES PVT LTD),KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T CIR - 4,KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 851/KOL/2013[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata14 Feb 2018AY 2008-2009

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri M.Balaganesh, Am & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi, Jm] I.T.A Nos. 848 To 850/Kol/2013 Assessment Years : 2005-06 To 2007-08 Ruguvalika Trading Pvt. Ltd. -Vs- Dcit, Circle-4, Kolkata (Since Merged With M.M. Murarka Share & Securities Pvt. Ltd. [Pan: Aabcr 5743 B] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri J.P.Khaitan, Sr. CounselFor Respondent: Shri P.K.Srihari, CIT
Section 143(3)

capital gain income and the same was to be taxed at a special rate under the provision of section 111A

RAGUVALIKA TRADING PVT LTD ( SINCE MERGED WITH M.M.MURARKA SHARE & SECURITIES PVT LTD),KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T CIR - 4,KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 849/KOL/2013[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata14 Feb 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri M.Balaganesh, Am & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi, Jm] I.T.A Nos. 848 To 850/Kol/2013 Assessment Years : 2005-06 To 2007-08 Ruguvalika Trading Pvt. Ltd. -Vs- Dcit, Circle-4, Kolkata (Since Merged With M.M. Murarka Share & Securities Pvt. Ltd. [Pan: Aabcr 5743 B] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri J.P.Khaitan, Sr. CounselFor Respondent: Shri P.K.Srihari, CIT
Section 143(3)

capital gain income and the same was to be taxed at a special rate under the provision of section 111A

RAGUVALIKA TRADING PVT LTD ( SINCE MERGED WITH M.M.MURARKA SHARE & SECURITIES PVT LTD),KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T CIR - 4,KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 850/KOL/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata14 Feb 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri M.Balaganesh, Am & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi, Jm] I.T.A Nos. 848 To 850/Kol/2013 Assessment Years : 2005-06 To 2007-08 Ruguvalika Trading Pvt. Ltd. -Vs- Dcit, Circle-4, Kolkata (Since Merged With M.M. Murarka Share & Securities Pvt. Ltd. [Pan: Aabcr 5743 B] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri J.P.Khaitan, Sr. CounselFor Respondent: Shri P.K.Srihari, CIT
Section 143(3)

capital gain income and the same was to be taxed at a special rate under the provision of section 111A

RAGUVALIKA TRADING PVT LTD ( SINCE MERGED WITH M.M.MURARKA SHARE & SECURITIES PVT LTD),KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T CIR - 4,KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 848/KOL/2013[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata14 Feb 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri M.Balaganesh, Am & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi, Jm] I.T.A Nos. 848 To 850/Kol/2013 Assessment Years : 2005-06 To 2007-08 Ruguvalika Trading Pvt. Ltd. -Vs- Dcit, Circle-4, Kolkata (Since Merged With M.M. Murarka Share & Securities Pvt. Ltd. [Pan: Aabcr 5743 B] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri J.P.Khaitan, Sr. CounselFor Respondent: Shri P.K.Srihari, CIT
Section 143(3)

capital gain income and the same was to be taxed at a special rate under the provision of section 111A

ACIT, CIRCLE - 31, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. PRADYUMNA DALMIA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 1280/KOL/2010[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Jan 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: : Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Mukherjee, JCIT, ld. Sr.DRFor Respondent: Shri R.N Bajoria, Sr. Advocate &
Section 143(3)Section 144ASection 14A

capital gains to the assessee in terms of section 111A of the Act. With regard to the comments of the Learned

SUNDEEP MUKHERJEE ,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD - 22(3), KOLKATA , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1271/KOL/2018[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata14 Nov 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Hon’Ble Vice -] I.T.A. No. 1271/Kol/2018 Assessment Year: 2005-06 Sundeep Mukherjee.............................……………………………………………………………....Appellant Commerce House, 8Th Floor, Room 3A, 2, Ganesh Chandra Avenue, Kolkat -700 013. [Pan : Afcpm 5140 E] Ito Ward 22(3) Kolkata...................………………………………………………….............Respondent 54/1, Rafi Ahmed Kidwai Road, Kolkata – 700 016. Appearances By: Shri Subash Agarwal, Advocate Appearing On Behalf Of The Assessee. Shri Pinaki Mukherjee, Addl. Cit Appearing On Behalf Of The Revenue. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : October 15, 2018 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : November 14, 2018 Order This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Ld. Cit (Appeals) – 6, Kolkata Dated 17.05.2018 Whereby He Upheld The Rectification Order Passed By The Ao U/S 154 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. The Assessee In The Present Case Is An Individual Who Filed His Return Of Income For The Year Under Consideration On 15.07.2005 Declaring A Total Income Of Rs. 1,63,230/-. In The Assessment Completed Originally U/S 143(3) Vide An Order Dated 26.12.2007, The Total Income Of The Assessee Was Determined By The Ao At Rs. 10,84,370/- After Making Addition Inter Alia On Account Of Short Term Capital Gain Amounting To Rs. 6,97,716/- & Tax @ 10% Was Calculated On Such Short Term Capital Gain As Per Section 111A Of The Act. Against The Order Passed By The Ao U/S 143(3), An Appeal Was Filed By The Assessee Before The Ld. Cit(A) Who Disposed Of The Same

Section 111ASection 143(3)Section 154Section 250Section 251

capital gain as per section 111A of the Act. Against the order passed by the AO u/s 143(3), an appeal

SHREE PADMASAGAR EXPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T CIR - 5,KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, assessee’s appeal stands allowed

ITA 1125/KOL/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata12 Aug 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Raviassessment Years:2008-09

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

capital gain; interest being paid by appellant on borrowed money in common kitty for investments; the high turnover was on account of frequency of transactions; the assessees had dealt in delivery trading purely with the intention of making quick profits on a huge turnover; the period of holding of a majority of the stock was few days; in most

DCIT, CIRCLE - 6,, KOLKATA vs. LOKNATH SARAF SECURITIES LTD.,, KOLKATA

In the result, to sum up ITA No

ITA 852/KOL/2008[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata08 Jul 2016AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

Section 43(5)Section 73

capital I.T.A. No. 852/KOL./2008 Assessment year: 2003-2004 Assessment Year: 2005-2006, Assessment Year: 2005-2006 & Assessment Year: 2008-2009 Page 26 of 27 gain at 10% as per section 111A

DCIT, CIR-12, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S THE DIAMOND COMPANY LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal stands dismissed

ITA 326/KOL/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata24 Aug 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Raviassessment Years:2009-10

Section 111ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 2(14)

section 111A lays down the procedure for taking the capital gains in respect of equity shares, and this section does

SRI SHANTILAL VIRA,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE - 45, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 256/KOL/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata03 Jan 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Hon’Ble Sri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Dr.Arjun Lal Saini, Am]

For Appellant: Shri Subash Agarwal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S.Dasgupta, Addl. CIT (DR)
Section 111ASection 143(3)

111A, the assessee has to establish that he has paid Securities Transaction Tax. It is further observed, as pointed out by the Ld. ITA No.256/Kol/2016 Sri Shantilal Vira A.Y.2006-07 3 CIT(A), that in order to avail computation of short term capital gains u/s.111A, the transactions are to be routed through stock exchange or it should be entered into DEMAT

PRADYUMNA DALMIA BENEFICIARY TRUST,KOLKATA vs. ADIT(CPC)/I.T.O., WARD - 33(2), , KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 1613/KOL/2024[2021-2022]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata11 Aug 2025AY 2021-2022

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 143(1)Section 250

111A and section 112A) exceeding two crore rupees, but is not covered under clauses (c) and (d), shall be applicable at the rate of fifteen per cent. of such income-tax:" 7. All the beneficiaries are individuals and it is well-settled that the status of a trust in which all the beneficiaries are individuals would be that

M/S JALAN CEMENT WORKS LTD,KOLKATA vs. C.I.T KOLKATA - I, KOLKATA

In the result, assessee’s appeal stands allowed

ITA 1112/KOL/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata24 Aug 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Raviassessment Year :2008-09 M/S. Jalan Cement Works V/S. Cit, Kolkata-1 Ltd 2Nd Floor, Room No Aayakar Bhawan, 202, 81, Netji Subhas Road, P-7, Chowringhee Kolkata-700 001 Square, Kolkata- [Pan No.: Aaacj6788R] 700 069 .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

Section 143(3)Section 263Section 73

111A of Rs.45,86,417/-, and c. Dividend income of Rs.22,65,340/- 16. The ld.CIT while applying the provisions of u/s 263 has made a comparison of the business loss with the short term capital gain on the ground that the income shown by the assessee from the source of LTCG and dividend is not chargeable to tax. Accordingly

DCIT, CIR-7(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S JET AGE SECURITIES PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1359/KOL/2015[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 Oct 2018AY 2011-2012

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri M.Balaganesh, Am & Hon’Ble Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi, Jm] I.T.A No. 1359/Kol/2015 Assessment Year : 2011-12 Dcit, Circle-7(1), Kolkata -Vs- M/S Jet Age Securities Pvt. Ltd. [Pan: Aabcj 0993 R] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Saurabh Kumar, Addl. CIT Sr. DRFor Respondent: Shri Manoj Kataruka, Advocate
Section 111ASection 143(3)Section 94(7)

capital gain. Therefore, the ground raised by the revenue on this issue is dismissed. 8 M/s Jet Age Securities Pvt. Ltd. A.Yr. 2011-12 2.6.3. Respectfully following the same, we hold that the ld CITA had rightly directed the ld AO to treat the subject mentioned gains on sale of shares as STCG u/s 111A of the Act instead

STERLING FINVEST PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR. 5(1), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 113/KOL/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata19 Nov 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm Dcit, Circle-5(1), Sterling Finvst Private Ltd. Aaykar Bhavan 1, Bonafide Lane, First Floor, P-7, Chowringhee Square, Vs. Kolkata-700001, West Bengal Kolkata-700069, West Bengal (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aacca8245L Assessee By : Shri Abhishek Bansal, Ar Revenue By : Shri P.P. Ranjan, Dr Date Of Hearing: 18.11.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 19.11.2025

For Appellant: Shri Abhishek Bansal, ARFor Respondent: Shri P.P. Ranjan, DR
Section 10(38)Section 111ASection 143(3)Section 14ASection 68

Section 111A of the Act. The ld. AO treated the long-term capital gain of ₹53,024,681 as bogus

TAPAN KUMAR DAS,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WD-50(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee on ground No

ITA 1063/KOL/2015[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 Jul 2017AY 2011-2012
For Appellant: Shri Manoj Tiwari, CAFor Respondent: Shri N.B.Som, JCIT
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

Section 90 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government hereby notifies that where an agreement entered into by the Central Government with the Government of any country outside India for granting relief of tax or as the case may be, avoidance of double taxation, provides that any Income of a resident of India

GUNJA SAMABAY KRISHI UNNAYAN SAMITY LTD,PURULIA vs. PCIT,, ASANSOL

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 110/KOL/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 Jun 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2016-17 Gunja Samabay Krishi Pcit, Asansol Unnayan Samity Ltd. Vill. Gunja, Golbera, P.S. Vs. Joypur, Dist. Purulia, Pin. 723103 Pan: Aabag 2110 M (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri M. Goenka, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sudipta Guha, CIT, DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(2)(i)

capital gains of the assessee is chargeable u/s 111A of the Act as discussed in para 6 of the order. Therefore deduction under section

SRI SANTOSH SALAMPURIA,BANKURA vs. I.T.O. WARD-3(1), BANKURA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2271/KOL/2025[2024-2025]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Jan 2026AY 2024-2025

Bench: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Vinay Kumar Gupta, ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhijit Adhikary, Sr. DR
Section 111ASection 115BSection 143(1)Section 87A

section 111A for denial of rebate in respect of tax payable on short- term capital gains arising from transfer of listed

MANISH PARASRAMPURIA,KOLKATA vs. A.O., NFAC / D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-43, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 654/KOL/2022[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata23 Feb 2023AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2015-16

For Appellant: Shri Siddarth Agarwal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Ranu Biswas, Addl. CIT, DR
Section 10(38)Section 111ASection 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 147Section 68

Capital Gain of Rs.39,41,595/- is genuine and bonafide transaction, as such, the same is liable to be taxed at Special Rate u/s. 111A of the Act.” 3. At the outset, Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that he is not pressing ground nos. 4 and 5 which deal with merit of the case and that he is restricting