BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “capital gains”+ Section 111Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai120Delhi16Pune9Kolkata8Chennai7Bangalore6Hyderabad4Jaipur4Surat3Nagpur3Indore2Ahmedabad2Rajkot2Agra1Lucknow1

Key Topics

Section 111A12Section 1477Section 906Section 87A6Section 143(1)5Section 2635Short Term Capital Gains5Section 2504Section 143(3)4Long Term Capital Gains

PRADYUMNA DALMIA BENEFICIARY TRUST,KOLKATA vs. ADIT(CPC)/I.T.O., WARD - 33(2), , KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 1613/KOL/2024[2021-2022]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata11 Aug 2025AY 2021-2022

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 143(1)Section 250

111A and section 112A) exceeding two crore rupees, but is not covered under clauses (c) and (d), shall be applicable at the rate of fifteen per cent. of such income-tax:" 7. All the beneficiaries are individuals and it is well-settled that the status of a trust in which all the beneficiaries are individuals would be that

STERLING FINVEST PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR. 5(1), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 113/KOL/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata19 Nov 2025
3
Penny Stock3
Deduction2
AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm Dcit, Circle-5(1), Sterling Finvst Private Ltd. Aaykar Bhavan 1, Bonafide Lane, First Floor, P-7, Chowringhee Square, Vs. Kolkata-700001, West Bengal Kolkata-700069, West Bengal (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aacca8245L Assessee By : Shri Abhishek Bansal, Ar Revenue By : Shri P.P. Ranjan, Dr Date Of Hearing: 18.11.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 19.11.2025

For Appellant: Shri Abhishek Bansal, ARFor Respondent: Shri P.P. Ranjan, DR
Section 10(38)Section 111ASection 143(3)Section 14ASection 68

Section 111A of the Act. The ld. AO treated the long-term capital gain of ₹53,024,681 as bogus

SRI SANTOSH SALAMPURIA,BANKURA vs. I.T.O. WARD-3(1), BANKURA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2271/KOL/2025[2024-2025]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Jan 2026AY 2024-2025

Bench: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Vinay Kumar Gupta, ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhijit Adhikary, Sr. DR
Section 111ASection 115BSection 143(1)Section 87A

section 111A for denial of rebate in respect of tax payable on short- term capital gains arising from transfer of listed

MANISH PARASRAMPURIA,KOLKATA vs. A.O., NFAC / D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-43, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 654/KOL/2022[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata23 Feb 2023AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2015-16

For Appellant: Shri Siddarth Agarwal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Ranu Biswas, Addl. CIT, DR
Section 10(38)Section 111ASection 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 147Section 68

Capital Gain of Rs.39,41,595/- is genuine and bonafide transaction, as such, the same is liable to be taxed at Special Rate u/s. 111A of the Act.” 3. At the outset, Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that he is not pressing ground nos. 4 and 5 which deal with merit of the case and that he is restricting

SUVODEEP PYNE,GARIA vs. ITO, WARD 63(1), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2251/KOL/2025[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata21 Jan 2026AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubeyita Nos.2251&2252/Kol/2025 Assessment Years: 2018-19 & 2020-21 Suvodeep Pyne…………………..…..……….………….……….……….……Appellant Castle Apt 3B, 129, Garia Main Road, Kamdahari, Garia S.O, W.B-700084.. [Pan: Bbypp8655C] Vs. Ito, Ward-63(1), Kolkata……………………………..…….....……...…..…..Respondent Appearances By: Shri Siddharth Pratim Dutta, Adv. & Sanjana Jha, Adv., Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri S B Chakraborthy, Cit, Sr. Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : December 04, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : January 21, 2026 Order Per Pradip Kumar Choubey: Both The Captioned Appeals Have Been Preferred By The Assessee For The Assessment Years 2018-19 & 2020-21 Against Separate Orders Both Dated 09.08.2025 Of The Addl/Jcit(A) Kochi [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’) Respectively. Since, The Issues Involved In Both The Appeals Are Common & Relate To The Same Assessee, Therefore, These Appeals Have Been Heard Together & Are Being Disposed Of By This Consolidated Order. Ita No.2251/Kol/2025 Is Taken As Lead Case For Narration Of Facts. Ita No.2251/Kol/2025 – Brief Facts Of The Case Are That In This 2. Case, The Assessee Filed His Return Of Income For The Fy-2017-18, Relevant To The A.Y- 2018-19 On 29.08.2018 By Disclosing Gross Total Income Of Rs. 68,85,998/- & Claimed Deduction A Sum Of Ra.7,455/-. During The Year Under Consideration, The Assessee Disclosed Income From Salary Of

Section 111ASection 112Section 154Section 250Section 90

gain u/s 111A sum of Rs.37,29,653/- and attracted tax @15% a sum of Rs.5,59,448/-and long term capital a sum of Rs. 5,71,972/-and attracted tax @ 20% a sum of Rs. 1,14,395/-u/s 112. The assessee claimed the entire salary Income was exempted as per as per DTAA and claimed relief

SUVODEEP PYNE,GARIA vs. ITO, WARD 63(1),, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2252/KOL/2025[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata21 Jan 2026AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubeyita Nos.2251&2252/Kol/2025 Assessment Years: 2018-19 & 2020-21 Suvodeep Pyne…………………..…..……….………….……….……….……Appellant Castle Apt 3B, 129, Garia Main Road, Kamdahari, Garia S.O, W.B-700084.. [Pan: Bbypp8655C] Vs. Ito, Ward-63(1), Kolkata……………………………..…….....……...…..…..Respondent Appearances By: Shri Siddharth Pratim Dutta, Adv. & Sanjana Jha, Adv., Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri S B Chakraborthy, Cit, Sr. Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : December 04, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : January 21, 2026 Order Per Pradip Kumar Choubey: Both The Captioned Appeals Have Been Preferred By The Assessee For The Assessment Years 2018-19 & 2020-21 Against Separate Orders Both Dated 09.08.2025 Of The Addl/Jcit(A) Kochi [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’) Respectively. Since, The Issues Involved In Both The Appeals Are Common & Relate To The Same Assessee, Therefore, These Appeals Have Been Heard Together & Are Being Disposed Of By This Consolidated Order. Ita No.2251/Kol/2025 Is Taken As Lead Case For Narration Of Facts. Ita No.2251/Kol/2025 – Brief Facts Of The Case Are That In This 2. Case, The Assessee Filed His Return Of Income For The Fy-2017-18, Relevant To The A.Y- 2018-19 On 29.08.2018 By Disclosing Gross Total Income Of Rs. 68,85,998/- & Claimed Deduction A Sum Of Ra.7,455/-. During The Year Under Consideration, The Assessee Disclosed Income From Salary Of

Section 111ASection 112Section 154Section 250Section 90

gain u/s 111A sum of Rs.37,29,653/- and attracted tax @15% a sum of Rs.5,59,448/-and long term capital a sum of Rs. 5,71,972/-and attracted tax @ 20% a sum of Rs. 1,14,395/-u/s 112. The assessee claimed the entire salary Income was exempted as per as per DTAA and claimed relief

SURESH KUMAR PODDAR,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 63(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1542/KOL/2024[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata06 Mar 2026AY 2011-2012

Bench: SHRI RAJESH KUMAR (Accountant Member)

Section 111ASection 132Section 132(1)Section 139(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 153CSection 250Section 250o

111A) of Rs.77,78,970/-, in the shares of Shri Ganesh Spinners Ltd., as unaccounted income of Rs.78,43,330/- and taxing the changed amount of Rs.78,43,330/- at normal tax rates under the head Income from other sources 6. That the Ld. CIT(A), NFAC, erred in law as well as in facts of the case by confirming

PATAKA INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD,KOLKATA vs. ACIT,CIR-7(1). , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 189/KOL/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata14 Jul 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 143(3)Section 263Section 37(1)

Capital Gain u/s 111A (ii) ICDS compliance and adjustment (iii) Verification of transaction (iv) Total income under Chapter VA of the Act. Therefore, it cannot be said that there was lack of enquiry 7 AY: 2018-19 Pataka Industries Pvt. Ltd. more particularly when detailed questionnaire was issued by the AO during the assessment proceeding