BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

180 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 67clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,259Delhi806Jaipur246Chennai186Kolkata180Ahmedabad172Bangalore156Chandigarh113Karnataka110Hyderabad86Surat80Pune69Indore66Cochin58Raipur45Calcutta39Rajkot35Nagpur35Lucknow28Allahabad26Cuttack25Visakhapatnam22Agra21Jodhpur18Guwahati16Amritsar9Dehradun8Telangana6Jabalpur6Patna5SC1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Ranchi1Varanasi1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 148117Section 14799Addition to Income80Section 143(3)57Section 6834Section 13230Section 26330Disallowance30Section 115J27

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND CEMENT & ROOFINGS PRIVATE LIMITED , KOLKATA

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1703/KOL/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Dec 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Manish Rastogi, ARFor Respondent: Shri Pankaj Pandey, DR
Section 115JSection 132Section 147Section 148Section 69A

Section 292C of the Act, the presumption is to be drawn in respect of WhatsApp transactions in the hands of the person from whose possession or control the books of accounts/ documents, etc. are found. Even the presumption u/s 292C of the Act is rebuttable when the assessee proved that he has not done any such transactions even in respect

Showing 1–20 of 180 · Page 1 of 9

...
Section 40A(3)18
Condonation of Delay15
Unexplained Cash Credit14

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND CEMENT & ROOFINGS PRIVATE LIMITED , KOLKATA

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1702/KOL/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Manish Rastogi, ARFor Respondent: Shri Pankaj Pandey, DR
Section 115JSection 132Section 147Section 148Section 69A

Section 292C of the Act, the presumption is to be drawn in respect of WhatsApp transactions in the hands of the person from whose possession or control the books of accounts/ documents, etc. are found. Even the presumption u/s 292C of the Act is rebuttable when the assessee proved that he has not done any such transactions even in respect

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND SPONGE AND IRON PRIVATE LIMITED, PATNA

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1596/KOL/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Dec 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Manish Rastogi, ARFor Respondent: Shri Pankaj Pandey, DR
Section 115JSection 132Section 147Section 148Section 69A

Section 292C of the Act, the presumption is to be drawn in respect of WhatsApp transactions in the hands of the person from whose possession or control the books of accounts/ documents, etc. are found. Even the presumption u/s 292C of the Act is rebuttable when the assessee proved that he has not done any such transactions even in respect

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND CEMENT & ROOFINGS PRIVATE LIMITED , KOLKATA

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1699/KOL/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Dec 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Manish Rastogi, ARFor Respondent: Shri Pankaj Pandey, DR
Section 115JSection 132Section 147Section 148Section 69A

Section 292C of the Act, the presumption is to be drawn in respect of WhatsApp transactions in the hands of the person from whose possession or control the books of accounts/ documents, etc. are found. Even the presumption u/s 292C of the Act is rebuttable when the assessee proved that he has not done any such transactions even in respect

GOPAL & SONS HUF,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 32(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1701/KOL/2024[2006-2007]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata08 Jan 2025AY 2006-2007

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Manish Rastogi, ARFor Respondent: Shri Pankaj Pandey, DR
Section 115JSection 132Section 147Section 148Section 69A

Section 292C of the Act, the presumption is to be drawn in respect of WhatsApp transactions in the hands of the person from whose possession or control the books of accounts/ documents, etc. are found. Even the presumption u/s 292C of the Act is rebuttable when the assessee proved that he has not done any such transactions even in respect

OM FORGING & ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. THE PR. CIT-1, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result the appeals are allowed

ITA 509/KOL/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Dec 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Dr.Arjun Lal Saini, Am ]

For Appellant: Shri A.K.Tibrewal, FCAFor Respondent: Md.Usman, CIT(DR)
Section 143(2)Section 147Section 263

67,888/- iv) Kamal Traders : Rs.34,03,534/- In all the bogus purchases for this year was Rs.72,84,304/-. 5. The AO while concluding the assessment u/s 147 of the Act in his order dated 30.03.2015 for both the assessment years issued notice u/s 143(2) and 142(1) of the Act calling upon the assessee to furnish several

V2 RETAIL LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 10(2), KOLKATA , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 612/KOL/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata14 Nov 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Vice-(Kz) & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

67,300/- on account of bogus purchases and determined the total loss of the assessee-company at Rs.18,26,41,949/- in the assessment completed under section

ITO WD 48(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. SRI PUSPAL KUMAR DAS, HOWRAH

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1442/KOL/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Dec 2015AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh, A.M. & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi, J.M.)

For Appellant: Shri Soumitra Choudhury, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Uday Kr. Sardar, JCIT
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)

bogus liabilities. He went on to hold that - "Application of Section 41(1) presupposes genuineness of allowed in ea1ier years. The fact that the assessee has claimed the said sum as expenditures in earlier years cannot be denied. As the liability ceased to exist as on 31.03.2007, as found during the proceeding, the sum of Rs.16,67,546/- is added

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(2), KOLKATA, AAYAKAR BHAWAN POORVA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. DHANSAR ENGINEERING COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 2507/KOL/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Jul 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar&Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey]

Section 132Section 132(1)Section 139Section 142Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 69Section 69CSection 80G

67,500/- on account of unexplained cash credit made in respect of bogus purchase without appreciating the material brought on record and facts evaluated by the AO in the assessment order . ii) That the case clearly falls under the exceptional clause i.e. case involving organized tax evasion by way of expenditure booked against accommodation entries vide para

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA vs. DOLLAR HOLDING PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1729/KOL/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata11 Feb 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

For Appellant: Shri A.K. Tulsyan, ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhijit Kundu, DR
Section 14ASection 68Section 69C

section 14A of the Act on account of expenses incurred to earn exempt income to Rs. 86,368/- in contravention of CBDT's Circular No. 5/2014 dated 11/02/2014?” 04. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed the return of income on 29.09.2015, declaring total loss of ₹10,22,220/-, which was selected for scrutiny under Computer Assisted

DEPUTY COMMISSOENR OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA vs. DOLLAR HOLDING PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1728/KOL/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata11 Feb 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

For Appellant: Shri A.K. Tulsyan, ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhijit Kundu, DR
Section 14ASection 68Section 69C

section 14A of the Act on account of expenses incurred to earn exempt income to Rs. 86,368/- in contravention of CBDT's Circular No. 5/2014 dated 11/02/2014?” 04. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed the return of income on 29.09.2015, declaring total loss of ₹10,22,220/-, which was selected for scrutiny under Computer Assisted

I.T.O WD - 1(2),HOOGHLY, HOOGHLY vs. SRI KALIN DUTTA, HOOGHLY

In the result, appeal by Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 1055/KOL/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Jun 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Raviassessment Year :2008-09

Section 143(3)

bogus purchase. 10. The assessee has claimed purchases for the materials from different parties during the relevant assessment year. The AO cross verified those purchases by issuing the notices to different parties under section 133(6) of the Act. However, notices to some of the parties were returned back with the remarks hereunder: Sl Name Amount involved Gist

DCIT, CIRCLE - 10, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. VEDA COMMERCIAL PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

Appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1527/KOL/2010[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Nov 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh, Am & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm]

For Appellant: Shri Subash Agarwal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Rabin Chaudhury, JCIT
Section 143(3)Section 14A

67 taxmann.com 253 (Kolkata trib) , wherein it was held :- & CO Nos. 153 & 154/Kol/2010 Veda Commercial Pvt. Ltd., AY 2006-07 & 2007-08 5.3 We have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record including the detailed paper book filed by the assessee containing the scrutiny assessment orders of the assessee for the Asst years

DCIT, CIRCLE - 10, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. VEDA COMMERCIAL PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

Appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1064/KOL/2010[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Nov 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh, Am & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm]

For Appellant: Shri Subash Agarwal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Rabin Chaudhury, JCIT
Section 143(3)Section 14A

67 taxmann.com 253 (Kolkata trib) , wherein it was held :- & CO Nos. 153 & 154/Kol/2010 Veda Commercial Pvt. Ltd., AY 2006-07 & 2007-08 5.3 We have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record including the detailed paper book filed by the assessee containing the scrutiny assessment orders of the assessee for the Asst years

D.C.I.T CIR - 1,KOLATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S PARIJAT VYAPAAR PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 2242/KOL/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata19 Feb 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi

Section 143(3)

bogus based on conjectures and surmises. Accordingly, the AO is directed to delete the addition of R.5,91,642/- on account of transactions with M/s Tyre Arcade. The AO is fu9rther directed to allow depreciation on the remaining purchase of rs.13,67,889/- in respect to the addition to fixed assets from the said party. This ground of appeal

D.C.I.T CIR - 1,KOLATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S PARIJAT VYAPAAR PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 2241/KOL/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata19 Feb 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi

Section 143(3)

bogus based on conjectures and surmises. Accordingly, the AO is directed to delete the addition of R.5,91,642/- on account of transactions with M/s Tyre Arcade. The AO is fu9rther directed to allow depreciation on the remaining purchase of rs.13,67,889/- in respect to the addition to fixed assets from the said party. This ground of appeal

BALMUKUND CONCAST PVT. LTD.,,PATNA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(3),, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1380/KOL/2025[2023-2024]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Apr 2026AY 2023-2024

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shripradip Kumar Choubey, Jm Balmukund Concast Pvt. Ltd. Dcit, Cc 4(3) 108 Kalyani Complex, Exhibition Aaykar Bhawan, Kolkata-700069 Vs. Road, Patna-800001, Bihar West Bengal (Respondent) (Appellant) Pan No. Aaacb9503G

For Appellant: Shri Manish Rastogi, ARFor Respondent: Shri Dheeraj, DR
Section 115JSection 132Section 143(1)

bogus purchases. Thus, once, the CESTAT and the Tribunal have held the purchases made by the four Jammu based entities to be genuine, the corresponding sales effected by them to the assessee have to be accepted as genuine. ITA Nos. 1380,1892 & 1893/KOL/2025 Balmukund Concast Pvt. Ltd; A.Y. 2019-20 & 2023-24 11. In that scenario, in our considered view

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND CONCAST PRIVATE LIMITED, PATNA

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1893/KOL/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Apr 2026AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shripradip Kumar Choubey, Jm Balmukund Concast Pvt. Ltd. Dcit, Cc 4(3) 108 Kalyani Complex, Exhibition Aaykar Bhawan, Kolkata-700069 Vs. Road, Patna-800001, Bihar West Bengal (Respondent) (Appellant) Pan No. Aaacb9503G

For Appellant: Shri Manish Rastogi, ARFor Respondent: Shri Dheeraj, DR
Section 115JSection 132Section 143(1)

bogus purchases. Thus, once, the CESTAT and the Tribunal have held the purchases made by the four Jammu based entities to be genuine, the corresponding sales effected by them to the assessee have to be accepted as genuine. ITA Nos. 1380,1892 & 1893/KOL/2025 Balmukund Concast Pvt. Ltd; A.Y. 2019-20 & 2023-24 11. In that scenario, in our considered view

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND CONCAST PRIVATE LIMITED, PATNA

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1892/KOL/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Apr 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shripradip Kumar Choubey, Jm Balmukund Concast Pvt. Ltd. Dcit, Cc 4(3) 108 Kalyani Complex, Exhibition Aaykar Bhawan, Kolkata-700069 Vs. Road, Patna-800001, Bihar West Bengal (Respondent) (Appellant) Pan No. Aaacb9503G

For Appellant: Shri Manish Rastogi, ARFor Respondent: Shri Dheeraj, DR
Section 115JSection 132Section 143(1)

bogus purchases. Thus, once, the CESTAT and the Tribunal have held the purchases made by the four Jammu based entities to be genuine, the corresponding sales effected by them to the assessee have to be accepted as genuine. ITA Nos. 1380,1892 & 1893/KOL/2025 Balmukund Concast Pvt. Ltd; A.Y. 2019-20 & 2023-24 11. In that scenario, in our considered view

RIZWAN ASRAJ,PURULIA vs. ITO-WD-3(2), PURULIA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 551/KOL/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 Mar 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Manish Borad

Section 143(3)

bogus.” 4. Perusal of the grounds shows that the sole issue relates to the genuineness of purchases of Rs.69,67,069/-. 4. Facts in brief are that the assessee is an individual and engaged in purchase and sale of liquor under his sole proprietorship concern in the name and style of “Purulia F.L. (OFF) Shop No. 2”. Income of Rs.722180