DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALAJEE MINI STEELS & REROLLING PRIVATE LIMITED , PATNA

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shripradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

6) and 131 of the Act was retumed unserved. The assessing officer, therefore, proceeded to add the entire purchases made by them under section 68 of the Act In the firat appellate stage the assessee submitted ledger account copy, confirmation of accounts and also furnished their Sales Tax registration number The Commissioner (Appeals) held that these transactions were trading transactions

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND SPONGE AND IRON PRIVATE LIMITED, PATNA

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

6) and 131 of the Act was retumed unserved. The assessing officer, therefore, proceeded to add the entire purchases made by them under section 68 of the Act In the firat appellate stage the assessee submitted ledger account copy, confirmation of accounts and also furnished their Sales Tax registration number The Commissioner (Appeals) held that these transactions were trading transactions

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND CEMENT & ROOFINGS PRIVATE LIMITED , KOLKATA

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

6) and 131 of the Act was retumed unserved. The assessing officer, therefore, proceeded to add the entire purchases made by them under section 68 of the Act In the firat appellate stage the assessee submitted ledger account copy, confirmation of accounts and also furnished their Sales Tax registration number The Commissioner (Appeals) held that these transactions were trading transactions

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND CEMENT & ROOFINGS PRIVATE LIMITED , KOLKATA

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

6) and 131 of the Act was retumed unserved. The assessing officer, therefore, proceeded to add the entire purchases made by them under section 68 of the Act In the firat appellate stage the assessee submitted ledger account copy, confirmation of accounts and also furnished their Sales Tax registration number The Commissioner (Appeals) held that these transactions were trading transactions

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND CEMENT & ROOFINGS PRIVATE LIMITED , KOLKATA

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

6) and 131 of the Act was retumed unserved. The assessing officer, therefore, proceeded to add the entire purchases made by them under section 68 of the Act In the firat appellate stage the assessee submitted ledger account copy, confirmation of accounts and also furnished their Sales Tax registration number The Commissioner (Appeals) held that these transactions were trading transactions

GOPAL & SONS HUF,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 32(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

6) and 131 of the Act was retumed unserved. The assessing officer, therefore, proceeded to add the entire purchases made by them under section 68 of the Act In the firat appellate stage the assessee submitted ledger account copy, confirmation of accounts and also furnished their Sales Tax registration number The Commissioner (Appeals) held that these transactions were trading transactions

UNISYS SOFTWARES AND HOLDING IND. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR. 8(2), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rakesh Mishraassessment Year: 2011-12

Section 250 (6) of the Act. In response to the notice of hearing no one has come present on behalf of the assessee. A letter is being sent dated 16.02.2024 contending therein that written submission and paperbook was already filed before the Tribunal. A paperbook running into 299 pages has been filed by the assessee which contains first 60 pages

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALAJEE MINI STEELS & REROLLING PRIVATE LIMITED , PATNA

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am\Nand\Nshripradip Kumar Choubey, Jm\Nita Nos.1688 To 1691/Kol/2025\N(Assessment Years: 2015-16 To 2018-19)\Nita No. 1725/Kol/2025\N(Assessment Year: 2016-17)\Ndcit, Central Circle 4(3)\Nbalajee Mini Steels & Rerolling\Naaykar Bhawan Poorva, 110,\Nprivate Limited\Nshantipally, Kolkata-700107,\N603, Shantikunj Apartment,\Nkolkata\Nphulwanipatna, G.P.O.800001,\N(Appellant)\Nvs.\Npatna\N(Respondent)\Npan No. Aabcb7265J\Nassessee By : Shri Manish Rastogi, Ar\Nrevenue By : S/Shri Praveen Kishore &\Npradeep Dungdung, Drs\Ndate Of Hearing: 01.12.2025\Ndate Of Pronouncement: 15.12.2025\Norder\Nper Rajesh Kumar, Am:\Nthese Are Appeals Preferred By The Revenue Against The Orders Of\Nthe Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals), Kolkata-27 (Hereinafter\Nreferred To As The “Ld. Cit(A)"] Dated 13.04.2025 For The Ays 2015-16\Nto 2018-19.\Nas The Facts & Issues In All The Appeals Of Revenue Are Exactly\Nidentical, Hence, For The Sake Of Brevity, We Take Ita No.\N1688/Kol/2025 For A.Y. 2015-16 & Decide The Issue Accordingly.\Nα.Υ. 2015-16\Npage 2\Nita Nos.1688 To 1691/Kol/2025&1725/Kol/2025\Nbalajee Mini Steels & Rerolling Private Limited; Ays 2015-16 To 2018-19\Nita No. 1688/Kol/2025\N3.\Nthe Only Issue Raised By The Revenue Is Against The Deletion Of\Naddition By The Id. Cit (A) Of ₹1,07,03,817/- As Made By The Id. Ao\Non Account Of Suppression Of Income In Respect Of Bogus Purchases.\N3.

bogus purchases the assessee was covering the purchases made\nfrom the grey market which were purchased at lesser price. It would kindly be\nappreciated that the facts of the case in hand is that both the purchases and\nthe sale are fictitious, as such, it would gratuitously be appreciated that the\nPage 8\nITA Nos.1688 to 1691/KOL/2025&1725/KOL/2025\nBalajee Mini

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA , KOLKATA vs. BALAJEE MINI STEELS & REROLLING PRIVATE LIMITED , PATNA

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am\Nand\Nshripradip Kumar Choubey, Jm\Nita Nos.1688 To 1691/Kol/2025\N(Assessment Years: 2015-16 To 2018-19)\Nita No. 1725/Kol/2025\N(Assessment Year: 2016-17)\Ndcit, Central Circle 4(3)\Nbalajee Mini Steels & Rerolling\Naaykar Bhawan Poorva, 110,\Nprivate Limited\Nshantipally, Kolkata-700107,\N603, Shantikunj Apartment,\Nkolkata\Nvs.\Nphulwanipatna, G.P.O.800001,\N(Appellant)\Npatna\N(Respondent)\Npan No. Aabcb7265J\Nassessee By\Nshri Manish Rastogi, Ar\Nrevenue By\Ns/Shri Praveen Kishore &\Npradeep Dungdung, Drs\Ndate Of Hearing: 01.12.2025\Ndate Of Pronouncement: 15.12.2025\Norder\Nper Rajesh Kumar, Am:\Nthese Are Appeals Preferred By The Revenue Against The Orders Of\Nthe Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals), Kolkata-27 (Hereinafter\Nreferred To As The “Ld. Cit(A)"] Dated 13.04.2025 For The Ays 2015-16\Nto 2018-19.\Nas The Facts & Issues In All The Appeals Of Revenue Are Exactly\Nidentical, Hence, For The Sake Of Brevity, We Take Ita No.\N1688/Kol/2025 For A.Y. 2015-16 & Decide The Issue Accordingly.\Nα.Υ. 2015-16\Npage 2\Nita Nos.1688 To 1691/Kol/2025&1725/Kol/2025\Nbalajee Mini Steels & Rerolling Private Limited; Ays 2015-16 To 2018-19\Nita No. 1688/Kol/2025\N3.\Nthe Only Issue Raised By The Revenue Is Against The Deletion Of\Naddition By The Id. Cit (A) Of ₹1,07,03,817/- As Made By The Id. Ao\Non Account Of Suppression Of Income In Respect Of Bogus Purchases.\N3.

bogus purchases the assessee was covering the purchases made\nfrom the grey market which were purchased at lesser price. It would kindly be\nappreciated that the facts of the case in hand is that both the purchases and\nthe sale are fictitious, as such, it would gratuitously be appreciated that the\nPage 8\nITA Nos.1688 to 1691/KOL/2025&1725/KOL/2025\nBalajee Mini

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALAJEE MINI STEELS & REROLLING PRIVATE LIMITED , PATNA

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am\Nand\Nshripradip Kumar Choubey, Jm\Nita Nos.1688 To 1691/Kol/2025\N(Assessment Years: 2015-16 To 2018-19)\Nita No. 1725/Kol/2025\N(Assessment Year: 2016-17)\Ndcit, Central Circle 4(3)\Nbalajee Mini Steels & Rerolling\Naaykar Bhawan Poorva, 110,\Nprivate Limited\Nshantipally, Kolkata-700107,\N603, Shantikunj Apartment,\Nkolkata\Nphulwanipatna, G.P.O.800001,\Nvs.\N(Appellant)\Npatna\N(Respondent)\Npan No. Aabcb7265J\Nassessee By\N:\Nshri Manish Rastogi, Ar\Nrevenue By\N:\Ns/Shri Praveen Kishore &\Npradeep Dungdung, Drs\Ndate Of Hearing:\N01.12.2025\Ndate Of Pronouncement:\N15.12.2025\Norder\Nper Rajesh Kumar, Am:\Nthese Are Appeals Preferred By The Revenue Against The Orders Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals), Kolkata-27 (Hereinafter Referred To As The “Ld. Cit(A)"] Dated 13.04.2025 For The Ays 2015-16 To 2018-19.\Nas The Facts & Issues In All The Appeals Of Revenue Are Exactly Identical, Hence, For The Sake Of Brevity, We Take Ita No. 1688/Kol/2025 For A.Y. 2015-16 & Decide The Issue Accordingly.\Nα.Υ. 2015-16\Npage 2\Nita Nos.1688 To 1691/Kol/2025&1725/Kol/2025\Nbalajee Mini Steels & Rerolling Private Limited; Ays 2015-16 To 2018-19\Nita No. 1688/Kol/2025\N3.\Nthe Only Issue Raised By The Revenue Is Against The Deletion Of Addition By The Id. Cit (A) Of ₹1,07,03,817/- As Made By The Id. Ao On Account Of Suppression Of Income In Respect Of Bogus Purchases.\N3.

bogus purchases the assessee was covering the purchases made\nfrom the grey market which were purchased at lesser price. It would kindly be\nappreciated that the facts of the case in hand is that both the purchases and\nthe sale are fictitious, as such, it would gratuitously be appreciated that the\nPage 8\nITA Nos.1688 to 1691/KOL/2025&1725/KOL/2025\nBalajee Mini

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND CEMENT & ROOFINGS PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

6) and 131 of the Act was retumed unserved. The assessing officer,\ntherefore, proceeded to add the entire purchases made by them under section 68 of\nthe Act\nIn the firat appellate stage the assessee submitted ledger account copy, confirmation\nof accounts and also furnished their Sales Tax registration number The Commissioner\n(Appeals) held that these transactions were trading

BALMUKUND SPONGE & IRON PVT. LTD.,,PATNA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(3),, KOLKATA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

6) and 131 of the Act was retumed unserved. The assessing officer,\ntherefore, proceeded to add the entire purchases made by them under section 68 of\nthe Act\nIn the firat appellate stage the assessee submitted ledger account copy, confirmation\nof accounts and also furnished their Sales Tax registration number The Commissioner\n(Appeals) held that these transactions were trading

BALMUKUND CEMENT & ROOFINGS PVT. LTD.,,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(3),, KOLKATA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

6) and 131 of the Act was retumed unserved. The assessing officer,\ntherefore, proceeded to add the entire purchases made by them under section 68 of\nthe Act\nIn the firat appellate stage the assessee submitted ledger account copy, confirmation\nof accounts and also furnished their Sales Tax registration number The Commissioner\n(Appeals) held that these transactions were trading

BALMUKUND SPONGE & IRON PVT. LTD.,,PATNA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(3),, KOLKATA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

6) and 131 of the Act was retumed unserved. The assessing officer,\ntherefore, proceeded to add the entire purchases made by them under section 68 of\nthe Act\nIn the firat appellate stage the assessee submitted ledger account copy, confirmation\nof accounts and also furnished their Sales Tax registration number The Commissioner\n(Appeals) held that these transactions were trading

BALMUKUND SPONGE & IRON PVT. LTD.,,PATNA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(3),, KOLKATA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

6) and 131 of the Act was retumed unserved. The assessing officer,\ntherefore, proceeded to add the entire purchases made by them under section 68 of\nthe Act\nIn the firat appellate stage the assessee submitted ledger account copy, confirmation\nof accounts and also furnished their Sales Tax registration number The Commissioner\n(Appeals) held that these transactions were trading

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND SPONGE AND IRON PRIVATE LIMITED, PATNA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

6) and 131 of the Act was retumed unserved. The assessing officer,\ntherefore, proceeded to add the entire purchases made by them under section 68 of\nthe Act\nIn the firat appellate stage the assessee submitted ledger account copy, confirmation\nof accounts and also furnished their Sales Tax registration number The Commissioner\n(Appeals) held that these transactions were trading

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. BALMUKUND LEASE FIN PRIVATE LIMITED, PATNA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

6) and 131 of the Act was retumed unserved. The assessing officer,\ntherefore, proceeded to add the entire purchases made by them under section 68 of\nthe Act\nIn the firat appellate stage the assessee submitted ledger account copy, confirmation\nof accounts and also furnished their Sales Tax registration number The Commissioner\n(Appeals) held that these transactions were trading

BALMUKUND SPONGE & IRON PVT. LTD.,,PATNA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(3),, KOLKATA

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

6) and 131 of the Act was retumed unserved. The assessing officer,\ntherefore, proceeded to add the entire purchases made by them under section 68 of\nthe Act\nIn the firat appellate stage the assessee submitted ledger account copy, confirmation\nof accounts and also furnished their Sales Tax registration number The Commissioner\n(Appeals) held that these transactions were trading

DCIT, CIR-26(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S CHIEN HSING TANNERY, KOLKATA

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Am] I.T. A No. 1629/Kol/2017 A.Y 2012-13 A.C.I.T, Cir-26(1), Kolkata V/S. M/S. Chien Hsing Tannery Pan: Aaefc7201R (Appellant) (Respondent)

section 68 with reference to purchases made in the course of business and consequently the addition of Rs. 2, 50, 21, 5681­ made u/s 68 was legally untenable and thus deserves to deleted in full. Without prejudice the appellant submits that in aggregate 33,300 pieces of raw hides were purchased by the appellant from four parties on the understanding