BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

63 results for “TDS”+ Survey u/s 133Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi304Mumbai258Bangalore126Hyderabad105Patna78Chennai72Kolkata63Jaipur51Raipur44Chandigarh33Visakhapatnam24Rajkot23Ahmedabad20Pune19Agra16Indore16Lucknow14Guwahati13Nagpur12Surat10Jodhpur10Panaji8Cochin7Varanasi4Allahabad2Jabalpur2Dehradun2Ranchi2

Key Topics

Section 6857Survey u/s 133A53Section 14749Section 133A46Addition to Income35TDS33Section 194J30Section 20128Section 143(3)26Section 250

EDUCO VENTURES PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T., CENTRAL CIRCLE - 1(4), KOLKATA

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 2025/KOL/2024[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata18 Dec 2025AY 2020-2021

Bench: the AO.

Section 133ASection 147Section 250Section 68

survey operation u/s 133A of the Act was conducted on 04.11.2019 during which certain incriminating documents were found. The case of the assessee was reopened u/s 147 of the Act by issuing notice u/s 148 of the Act on 31.03.2021. In com- pliance, the assessee filed return of income declaring loss of Rs. 3,03,01,821/-. The AO observed

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. EDUCO VENTURES PVT LTD., KOLKATA

Appeal is dismissed

Showing 1–20 of 63 · Page 1 of 4

26
Section 14824
Condonation of Delay21
ITA 2144/KOL/2024[2015-16]Status: Disposed
ITAT Kolkata
18 Dec 2025
AY 2015-16

Bench: the AO.

Section 133ASection 147Section 250Section 68

survey operation u/s 133A of the Act was conducted on 04.11.2019 during which certain incriminating documents were found. The case of the assessee was reopened u/s 147 of the Act by issuing notice u/s 148 of the Act on 31.03.2021. In com- pliance, the assessee filed return of income declaring loss of Rs. 3,03,01,821/-. The AO observed

EDUCO VENTURES PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T., CENTRAL CIRCLE - 1(4), KOLKATA

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 2024/KOL/2024[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata18 Dec 2025AY 2015-2016

Bench: the AO.

Section 133ASection 147Section 250Section 68

survey operation u/s 133A of the Act was conducted on 04.11.2019 during which certain incriminating documents were found. The case of the assessee was reopened u/s 147 of the Act by issuing notice u/s 148 of the Act on 31.03.2021. In com- pliance, the assessee filed return of income declaring loss of Rs. 3,03,01,821/-. The AO observed

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. EDUCO VENTURES PVT LTD, KOLKATA

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 2125/KOL/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata18 Dec 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: the AO.

Section 133ASection 147Section 250Section 68

survey operation u/s 133A of the Act was conducted on 04.11.2019 during which certain incriminating documents were found. The case of the assessee was reopened u/s 147 of the Act by issuing notice u/s 148 of the Act on 31.03.2021. In com- pliance, the assessee filed return of income declaring loss of Rs. 3,03,01,821/-. The AO observed

SANJAY TRANSPORT AGENCY,RANIGANJ vs. ACIT, CIR. 3(1), ASANSOL

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed and the cross- appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 567/KOL/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Mar 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarmai.T.A No.567/Kol/2020 Assessment Year: 2010-11 Sanjay Transport Agency............................................................................….. Appellant 41, N.S.B. Road, Raniganj – 713347. [Pan: Aavfs6659N] Vs. Acit, Circle-3(1), Asansol...............................................................…… …. Respondent I.T.A No.633/Kol/2020 Assessment Year: 2010-11 Ito, Ward-3(1), Asansol............................................................................….. Appellant Vs. Sanjay Transport Agency...............................................................…… …. Respondent 41, N.S.B. Road, Raniganj – 713347. [Pan: Aavfs6659N] Appearances By: Shri Anil Kochar, Adv. & Shri Aryan Kochar, Ca, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Vivek Verma, Cit-Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : January 10, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : March 13, 2023 आदेश / Order मनीष बोरड, लेखा सद"य "वारा / Per Manish Borad: The Above Captioned Appeal For Assessment Year 2010-11 Filed By The Assessee & Cross Appeal Filed By The Revenue Are Directed Against The Order Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Asansol Both Dated 22.09.2020 Are Arising Out Of The Order U/S 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’). The Assessee In Ita No.567/Kol/2020 Has Taken The Following 2. Grounds Of Appeal:

Section 133ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)

133A of the Act was conducted on 26.03.2010. A profit and loss account on the date of survey was printed out from the computer installed in the office of the assessee and the same has been reproduced in the assessment order, wherein, the assessee has offered additional income at Rs.17047290/-. Thereafter, return of income for assessment year

ITO, WARD-3(1), ASANSOL vs. SANJAY TRANSPORT AGENCY, RANIGUNG

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed and the cross- appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 633/KOL/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Mar 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarmai.T.A No.567/Kol/2020 Assessment Year: 2010-11 Sanjay Transport Agency............................................................................….. Appellant 41, N.S.B. Road, Raniganj – 713347. [Pan: Aavfs6659N] Vs. Acit, Circle-3(1), Asansol...............................................................…… …. Respondent I.T.A No.633/Kol/2020 Assessment Year: 2010-11 Ito, Ward-3(1), Asansol............................................................................….. Appellant Vs. Sanjay Transport Agency...............................................................…… …. Respondent 41, N.S.B. Road, Raniganj – 713347. [Pan: Aavfs6659N] Appearances By: Shri Anil Kochar, Adv. & Shri Aryan Kochar, Ca, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Vivek Verma, Cit-Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : January 10, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : March 13, 2023 आदेश / Order मनीष बोरड, लेखा सद"य "वारा / Per Manish Borad: The Above Captioned Appeal For Assessment Year 2010-11 Filed By The Assessee & Cross Appeal Filed By The Revenue Are Directed Against The Order Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Asansol Both Dated 22.09.2020 Are Arising Out Of The Order U/S 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’). The Assessee In Ita No.567/Kol/2020 Has Taken The Following 2. Grounds Of Appeal:

Section 133ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)

133A of the Act was conducted on 26.03.2010. A profit and loss account on the date of survey was printed out from the computer installed in the office of the assessee and the same has been reproduced in the assessment order, wherein, the assessee has offered additional income at Rs.17047290/-. Thereafter, return of income for assessment year

PATAKA INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-8(2), KOLKATA PRESENTLY CIRCLE-7(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 342/KOL/2022[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata21 Mar 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri Anil Kochar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Prabhakar Prakash Ranjan, Addl. CIT
Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 154Section 201(1)Section 40

TDS done for rent payment by the assessee. Again on third occasion, subsequent to a survey u/s. 133A(2A), proceedings

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1 4 KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. MURLIDHAR RATANLAL EXPORTS LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and the COs of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 2245/KOL/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 Oct 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

For Appellant: Shri A.K. Tulsyan &For Respondent: Shri Sallong Yaden, DR
Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

u/s 133A of the Act was conducted on 04.11.2019 at the premises of the assessee group including the premise of the assessee company and in survey various incriminating documents/materials were found. Assessment proceeding is initiated on the basis of the material found in the survey. But ironically the AO did not refer any impounded document/paper with its identity mark either

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. MURLIDHAR RATANLAL EXPORTS LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and the COs of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 2187/KOL/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 Oct 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

For Appellant: Shri A.K. Tulsyan &For Respondent: Shri Sallong Yaden, DR
Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

u/s 133A of the Act was conducted on 04.11.2019 at the premises of the assessee group including the premise of the assessee company and in survey various incriminating documents/materials were found. Assessment proceeding is initiated on the basis of the material found in the survey. But ironically the AO did not refer any impounded document/paper with its identity mark either

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. MURLIDHAR RATANLAL EXPORTS LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and the COs of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 2196/KOL/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 Oct 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

For Appellant: Shri A.K. Tulsyan &For Respondent: Shri Sallong Yaden, DR
Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

u/s 133A of the Act was conducted on 04.11.2019 at the premises of the assessee group including the premise of the assessee company and in survey various incriminating documents/materials were found. Assessment proceeding is initiated on the basis of the material found in the survey. But ironically the AO did not refer any impounded document/paper with its identity mark either

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. MURLIDHAR RATANLAL EXPORTS LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and the COs of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 2179/KOL/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 Oct 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

For Appellant: Shri A.K. Tulsyan &For Respondent: Shri Sallong Yaden, DR
Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

u/s 133A of the Act was conducted on 04.11.2019 at the premises of the assessee group including the premise of the assessee company and in survey various incriminating documents/materials were found. Assessment proceeding is initiated on the basis of the material found in the survey. But ironically the AO did not refer any impounded document/paper with its identity mark either

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. VIVEK GUPTA, KOLKATA

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1557/KOL/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 Oct 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI SONJOY SARMA (Judicial Member)

Section 131Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 195Section 250Section 40Section 68

TDS u/s 195 of the Act on payment of Overseas Agents Commission. A survey was conducted on 04.11.2019 u/s 133A

DCIT, CC-2(3), KOLKATA, AAYAKAR BHAWAN POORVA vs. MAXCAB INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2590/KOL/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Oct 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm Dcit, Central Circle-2(3), Maxcab Industries Pvt. Ltd. 4Th Floor, 110 Shantipally, 67/C, Balaram Dey Street, E.M. Bypass, Vs. West Bengal-700006 West Bengal-700107 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aancm1997Q Assessee By : Shri Soumitra Choudhury & Ms. Nandini Surekh, Shri Pranabesh Sarkar, Ars Revenue By : Praveen Kishore, Dr Date Of Hearing: 04.09.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 16.10.2025

For Appellant: Shri Soumitra Choudhury &For Respondent: Praveen Kishore, DR
Section 131Section 132(1)Section 133(6)Section 133ASection 143(1)Section 68

survey u/s 133A of the Act were conducted on Goel Group of cases on 15.03.2022. The assessee was also part of the said group. During the search, according to the ld. AO various incriminating documents were discovered and seized which revealed that assessee had borrowed two money by way of loans, aggregating to ₹11,50,00,000/- from two parties

SIKKIM DISTILLERIES LIMITED,EAST SIKKIM vs. D.C.I.T. (TDS), CIRCLE - 5, GANGTOK, GANGTOK

In the result, all the 12 appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1045/KOL/2024[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 Aug 2024AY 2012-2013

Bench: Sri Sanjay Garg & Sri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 144Section 147Section 201Section 201(1)Section 206CSection 206C(7)

133A of the Act was conducted on the factory premises of the Appellant on 16.2.2018. Pursuant to the said survey, assessments were framed u/s 144/147 (for AYs 2012-13 to 2016-17) and u/s 144 (for AY 2017-18) and assessment orders dated 29.12.2018 (for AYs 2012-13 to 2016-17) and 29.12.2019 (for AY 2017-18) (were passed

SIKKIM DISTILLERIES LIMITED,EAST SIKKIM vs. D.C.I.T.(TDS), CIRCLE - 5, GANGTOK, GANGTOK

In the result, all the 12 appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1054/KOL/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 Aug 2024AY 2017-2018

Bench: Sri Sanjay Garg & Sri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 144Section 147Section 201Section 201(1)Section 206CSection 206C(7)

133A of the Act was conducted on the factory premises of the Appellant on 16.2.2018. Pursuant to the said survey, assessments were framed u/s 144/147 (for AYs 2012-13 to 2016-17) and u/s 144 (for AY 2017-18) and assessment orders dated 29.12.2018 (for AYs 2012-13 to 2016-17) and 29.12.2019 (for AY 2017-18) (were passed

SIKKIM DISTILLERIES LIMITED,EAST SIKKIM vs. D.C.I.T. (TDS), GANGTOK, GANGTOK

In the result, all the 12 appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1049/KOL/2024[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 Aug 2024AY 2014-2015

Bench: Sri Sanjay Garg & Sri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 144Section 147Section 201Section 201(1)Section 206CSection 206C(7)

133A of the Act was conducted on the factory premises of the Appellant on 16.2.2018. Pursuant to the said survey, assessments were framed u/s 144/147 (for AYs 2012-13 to 2016-17) and u/s 144 (for AY 2017-18) and assessment orders dated 29.12.2018 (for AYs 2012-13 to 2016-17) and 29.12.2019 (for AY 2017-18) (were passed

SIKKIM DISTILLERIES LIMITED,EAST SIKKAM vs. D.C.I.T. (TDS), CIRCLE - 5, GANGTOK, GANGTOK

In the result, all the 12 appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1053/KOL/2024[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 Aug 2024AY 2016-2017

Bench: Sri Sanjay Garg & Sri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 144Section 147Section 201Section 201(1)Section 206CSection 206C(7)

133A of the Act was conducted on the factory premises of the Appellant on 16.2.2018. Pursuant to the said survey, assessments were framed u/s 144/147 (for AYs 2012-13 to 2016-17) and u/s 144 (for AY 2017-18) and assessment orders dated 29.12.2018 (for AYs 2012-13 to 2016-17) and 29.12.2019 (for AY 2017-18) (were passed

SIKKIM DISTILLERIES LIMITED,EAST SIKKIM vs. D.C.I.T.(TDS), CIRCLE - 5, GANGTOK, GANGTOK

In the result, all the 12 appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1052/KOL/2024[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 Aug 2024AY 2016-2017

Bench: Sri Sanjay Garg & Sri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 144Section 147Section 201Section 201(1)Section 206CSection 206C(7)

133A of the Act was conducted on the factory premises of the Appellant on 16.2.2018. Pursuant to the said survey, assessments were framed u/s 144/147 (for AYs 2012-13 to 2016-17) and u/s 144 (for AY 2017-18) and assessment orders dated 29.12.2018 (for AYs 2012-13 to 2016-17) and 29.12.2019 (for AY 2017-18) (were passed

SIKKIM DISTILLERIES LIMITED,EAST SIKKIM vs. D.C.I.T.(TDS), CIRCLE - 5 , GANGTOK, GANGTOK

In the result, all the 12 appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1051/KOL/2024[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 Aug 2024AY 2015-2016

Bench: Sri Sanjay Garg & Sri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 144Section 147Section 201Section 201(1)Section 206CSection 206C(7)

133A of the Act was conducted on the factory premises of the Appellant on 16.2.2018. Pursuant to the said survey, assessments were framed u/s 144/147 (for AYs 2012-13 to 2016-17) and u/s 144 (for AY 2017-18) and assessment orders dated 29.12.2018 (for AYs 2012-13 to 2016-17) and 29.12.2019 (for AY 2017-18) (were passed

SIKKIM DISTILLERIES LIMITED,EAST SIKKIM vs. D.C.I.T. (TDS), GANGTOK, GANGTOK

In the result, all the 12 appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1050/KOL/2024[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 Aug 2024AY 2015-2016

Bench: Sri Sanjay Garg & Sri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 144Section 147Section 201Section 201(1)Section 206CSection 206C(7)

133A of the Act was conducted on the factory premises of the Appellant on 16.2.2018. Pursuant to the said survey, assessments were framed u/s 144/147 (for AYs 2012-13 to 2016-17) and u/s 144 (for AY 2017-18) and assessment orders dated 29.12.2018 (for AYs 2012-13 to 2016-17) and 29.12.2019 (for AY 2017-18) (were passed