THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 3(2), GANGTOK, GANGTOK SIKKIM vs. SIKKIM STATE COOPERATIVE SUPPLY AND MARKETING FEDERATION LIMITED , GANGTOK SIKKIM

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey & Shri Rakesh Mishra

TDS; (ii) disallowance of claim of deduction of Rs. 10,00,000/- u/s 80G of the Act towards donation, and (iii) disallowance of claim of deduction of Rs. 1,45,86,229/- u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Act in respect of interest income from investments made with Cooperative Banks. Thereafter, penalty proceedings u/s 270A of the Act for under

THE ELECTRO URBAN URBAY CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD. ,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CPC, BANGLURU

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Sri Sanjay Garg & Sri Sanjay Awasthi

2)(d) of the Act. It is also directed that the disallowance u/s 36(1)(va) of the Act should be considered under the overall ambit of Section 80P of the Act, in case it is allowed and also the credit of TDS

DCIT, CIRCLE - 5(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. COAL INDIA LIMITED , KOLKATA

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey & Shri Rakesh Mishra

TDS was availed and based upon the confirmation from the bank, which was pending at the time of assessment and which must have been received by now, and after granting an opportunity of being heard to the assessee and after considering its submission, re-adjudicate this issue on the basis of facts and as per law. The assessee claims that

DCIT, CIR-5(1), , KOLKATA vs. M/S COAL INDIA LTD., KOLKATA

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey & Shri Rakesh Mishra

TDS was availed and based upon the confirmation from the bank, which was pending at the time of assessment and which must have been received by now, and after granting an opportunity of being heard to the assessee and after considering its submission, re-adjudicate this issue on the basis of facts and as per law. The assessee claims that

M/S COAL INDIA LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR-5(1), , KOLKATA

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey & Shri Rakesh Mishra

d. Relaxo Footwear Ltd. v. ACIT [(2012) 50 SOT 102 (Del ITAT) e. West Bengal Infrastructure Development Finance Corporation Ltd [2023] 149 taxmann.com 181 (Calcutta) f. Maruti Udyog Ltd. v. DCIT (2005) 92 ITD 119 (Del) (A. Y. 1999- 2000) g. Jindal Saw Pipes Ltd. [2008] 118 TTJ 228 (Delhi) h. ACIT v. Eicher

DARJEELING DISTRICT CENTRAL CO.OP. BANK LTD. ,DARJEELING vs. ACIT(OSD)(TDS)WD-5(3), DARJEELING, , DARJEELING.

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rakesh Mishra

D E R PER RAKESH MISHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: These three appeals having filed by the assessee are against the separate orders of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi (hereinafter referred to as “the Ld. CIT(A)” passed u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) dated 10.06.2023, details

DARJEELING DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. ,DARJEELING vs. ACIT(OSD)(TDS),WD-5(3),DARJEELING, DARJEELING.

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rakesh Mishra

D E R PER RAKESH MISHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: These three appeals having filed by the assessee are against the separate orders of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi (hereinafter referred to as “the Ld. CIT(A)” passed u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) dated 10.06.2023, details

DARJEELING DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP. BANK LTD. ,DARJEELING vs. ACIT, CIR-3(1),SILIGURI. , SILIGURI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rakesh Mishra

D E R PER RAKESH MISHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: These three appeals having filed by the assessee are against the separate orders of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi (hereinafter referred to as “the Ld. CIT(A)” passed u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) dated 10.06.2023, details

METROPOLITAN ENGG. CO-OPT SOCIETY LTD.,NADIA vs. JCIT, RG.NADIA, NADIA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi, Jm & Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.405/Kol/2014 ("नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year:2007-2008) M/S Metropolitan Engg. Co-Operative Vs. Jcit, Range-Nadia Society Limited, C/O. P.S.Gupta(Advocate) 100, Bank Lane, Hatar Para P.O. Krishnagar, Dist-Nadia, Pin-741101 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaefm 4520 H .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) Assessee By : Shri P.S.Gupta, Advocate Revenue By : Md. Ghyas Uddin, Jcit सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 04/01/2017 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement 13/01/2017 आदेश / O R D E R Per Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Am: The Captioned Appeal Filed By The Assessee, Pertaining To The Assessment Year 2007-08, Is Directed Against The Order Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-Xxxvi, Kolkata, In Appeal No.995/Cit(A)-Xxxvi/Kol/Jcit, Range, Nadia/09-10, Dated 31.12.2013, Which In Turn Arises Out Of An Order Passed By The Assessing Officer (Ao) Under Section 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act 1961, (In Short The ‘Act’), Dated, 18.12.2009. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Qua The Assessee Are That Assessee Filed Its Return Of Income Declaring Total Income Of Rs.26,54,071/-. Assessee’S Case Was Selected For Scrutiny & The Ao Completed The Assessment U/S.143(3) By Making Various Additions. 3. Aggrieved From The Order Of The Ao, Assessee Filed An Appeal

D E R Per Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, AM: The captioned appeal filed by the Assessee, pertaining to the Assessment Year 2007-08, is directed against the order passed by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-XXXVI, Kolkata, in Appeal No.995/CIT(A)-XXXVI/Kol/JCIT, Range, Nadia/09-10, dated 31.12.2013, which in turn arises out of an order passed by the Assessing

A.C.PAUL AGRICULTURAL CO. PVT. LTD.,SILIGURI vs. D.C.I.T.,CIR-1, KOLKATA , SILIGURI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble & Shri Girish Agrawal, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 2469/Kol/2019 Assessment Year: 2013-14 A.C. Paul Agricultural Co. Pvt. D.C.I.T., Cir-I, Siliguri Ltd. Vs ‘Arjun Bhawan’ 177, Hill Cart Road Siliguri Darjeeling - 734001 [Pan : Aacca5650M] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Soumitra Choudhury, Advocate Revenue By : Shri Vijay Kumar, Addl. Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 19/01/2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 08/02/2023 आदेश/O R D E R Per Shri Rajpal Yadav: The Present Appeal Is Directed At The Instance Of The Assessee Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) - Siliguri, (Hereinafter The “Ld. Cit(A)”) Dt. 19/09/2019, Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act’), For Assessment Year 2013-14. 2. Before Taking Cognizance Of The Grounds Of Appeal Taken By The Assessee In Seriatim, We Deem It Proper To Take Note Of The Brief Background. The Assessee Is A Company Engaged In Tea Plantation & Manufacturing Of Tea. It Has Filed Its Return Of Income On 28/09/2013 Declaring Total Income Of Rs.96,04,272/-. The Case Of The Assessee Was Selected For Scrutiny Assessment & A Notice U/S 143(2) & 142(1) Of The Act Was Issued & Served Upon The Assessee. The Ld. Assessing Officer Has Passed Assessment Order U/S 143(3) Of The Act On 18/03/2016. The Assessing Officer Has Made Certain

D E R PER SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, VICE PRESIDENT : The present appeal is directed at the instance of the assessee against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - Siliguri, (hereinafter the “ld. CIT(A)”) dt. 19/09/2019, passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act’), for Assessment Year 2013-14. 2. Before taking cognizance