BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “TDS”+ Section 5Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai129Chennai36Bangalore34Delhi17Raipur17Pune9Hyderabad6Jaipur6Kolkata5Ahmedabad4Karnataka4Lucknow2Visakhapatnam2Panaji1Indore1

Key Topics

Section 405Section 143(3)4Section 23Section 56(2)2Section 56(2)(x)2Section 50C2Section 92C2Section 92D(1)2TDS2Transfer Pricing

ACID, CIRCLE-5(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. EMAMI REALTY LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeal of the Revenue and cross objections of the assessee are\ndismissed

ITA 1457/KOL/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata12 Jan 2026AY 2021-22
Section 143(3)Section 194ISection 2Section 250Section 50CSection 56Section 56(2)Section 56(2)(x)

5A) of the Act. Accordingly, the\napplicability of provisions of Section 194-IC fails. Therefore, I agree with the appellant's\ncontention that NFAC's direction to the JAO to refer the matter to AO, TDS

2
TP Method2

I.T.O WD - 3(4),KOLKATA., KOLKATA vs. M/S AMIYA CORPORATION (INDIA) PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal stands dismissed

ITA 2326/KOL/2013[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata11 May 2016AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri N.V.Vasusdevan & Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year :2005-06

Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 194Section 194CSection 40

5A, Kolkta-700 069 Orient Row, Kolkata-700 017 [PAN No.AADCA 4119 Q] .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Shri Satyendra Moha Das, JCIT-SR-DR अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/By Appellant Shri S.M.Surana, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से/By Respondent 21-04-2016 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing 11-05-2016 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement आदेश

THE JUTE CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD., ,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD - 1(3), KOLKATA , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 2428/KOL/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Jan 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap(Kz) & Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

Section 43B

section 43B of the Income Tax Act. The assessee had advanced its claim relying on the decision of the Hon’ble Kolkata High Court in the case of M/s. Exide Industries Ltd. reported in 292 ITR 470. However, the Assessing Officer did not accept the assessee’s claim observing that Department has preferred a Special Leave Petition before

M/S PHILLIPS INDIA LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CIR-12(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 612/KOL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata07 Feb 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri M.Balaganesh, Am ] I.T.A No. 612/Kol/2017 Assessment Year : 2012-13 M/S Philips India Ltd. -Vs- Acit, Circle-12(2), Kolkata (Formerly Philips Electronics India Ltd.) [Pan: Aabcp 9487 A] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Arvind Sonde, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri G. Mallikarjuna, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 92CSection 92D(1)

5a: Production value ; or 5b: Production quantities (mostly at AG level). 5c: Purchase value in case of outsourced production or contract manufacturing (internal or external Philips) The services as per Module 3 are Nil for Indian entity. The assessee has allocated costs in proportion of the turnover for Modules 1, 2, & 4 whereas the allocation for Module 5 is basis

M/S. PHILIPS INDIA LIMITED (FORMERLY PHILIPS ELECTRONICS INDIA LITD.),KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE - 12(2), KOLKATA , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2489/KOL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata04 Apr 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri A.T.Varkey, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri M.Balaganesh, Am ] I.T.A No. 2489/Kol/2017 Assessment Year : 2013-14 M/S Philips India Ltd. -Vs- Acit, Circle-12(2), Kolkata (Formerly Philips Electronics India Ltd.) [Pan: Aabcp 9487 A] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Arvind Sonde, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri G. Mallikarjuna, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 92CSection 92D(1)

5a: Production value ; or 5b: Production quantities (mostly at AG level). 5c: Purchase value in case of outsourced production or contract manufacturing (internal or external Philips) The services as per Module 3 are Nil for Indian entity. The assessee has allocated costs in proportion of the turnover for Modules 1, 2, & 4 whereas the allocation for Module 5 is basis