BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

324 results for “TDS”+ Section 57clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,558Mumbai1,444Bangalore854Chennai445Kolkata324Ahmedabad322Hyderabad299Chandigarh249Indore242Cochin199Pune181Jaipur166Karnataka153Visakhapatnam88Raipur71Jabalpur65Cuttack61Lucknow59Rajkot58Surat41Ranchi32Agra25Jodhpur23Allahabad21Amritsar18Dehradun17Nagpur16Guwahati15Telangana11SC9Varanasi8Punjab & Haryana5Panaji5Patna4Himachal Pradesh2J&K2Uttarakhand2Calcutta1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)67Disallowance55Section 4052Addition to Income52TDS45Deduction39Section 14735Section 26333Section 14A25Section 250

A.C.I.T(TDS) CIR - 57,KOL, KOLKATA vs. M/S HERITAGE HEALTH TPA (P) LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, appeals of assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 1761/KOL/2012[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Dec 2016AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri N.V.Vasudevan & Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 194JSection 254

section 194J of the Act. Therefore in our considered opinion the investigation and investigation & procedure charges are outside the purview of TDS provisions. 10.1 However the ld. AR before us filed the affidavit stating that the recipient hospitals have already discharged their obligations towards the tax liability by filing the returns of income. The ld. AR also submitted the list

HERIGAGE HEALTH TPA(P)LTD,KOLKATA vs. DCIT(TDS), CIRCLE -57, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, appeals of assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 1156/KOL/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata

Showing 1–20 of 324 · Page 1 of 17

...
21
Section 6821
Section 19520
09 Dec 2016
AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri N.V.Vasudevan & Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 194JSection 254

section 194J of the Act. Therefore in our considered opinion the investigation and investigation & procedure charges are outside the purview of TDS provisions. 10.1 However the ld. AR before us filed the affidavit stating that the recipient hospitals have already discharged their obligations towards the tax liability by filing the returns of income. The ld. AR also submitted the list

M/S HERITAGE HEALTH TPA PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 57, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, appeals of assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 1140/KOL/2016[10-Sep]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Dec 2016

Bench: Shri N.V.Vasudevan & Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 194JSection 254

section 194J of the Act. Therefore in our considered opinion the investigation and investigation & procedure charges are outside the purview of TDS provisions. 10.1 However the ld. AR before us filed the affidavit stating that the recipient hospitals have already discharged their obligations towards the tax liability by filing the returns of income. The ld. AR also submitted the list

M/S HERITAGE HEALTH TPA PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR-57(TDS), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, appeals of assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 643/KOL/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Dec 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri N.V.Vasudevan & Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 194JSection 254

section 194J of the Act. Therefore in our considered opinion the investigation and investigation & procedure charges are outside the purview of TDS provisions. 10.1 However the ld. AR before us filed the affidavit stating that the recipient hospitals have already discharged their obligations towards the tax liability by filing the returns of income. The ld. AR also submitted the list

M/S HERITAGE HEALTH TPA PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 57, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, appeals of assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 1139/KOL/2016[09-Aug]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Dec 2016

Bench: Shri N.V.Vasudevan & Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 194JSection 254

section 194J of the Act. Therefore in our considered opinion the investigation and investigation & procedure charges are outside the purview of TDS provisions. 10.1 However the ld. AR before us filed the affidavit stating that the recipient hospitals have already discharged their obligations towards the tax liability by filing the returns of income. The ld. AR also submitted the list

DCIT, CIRCLE - 11(1), KOLKATA , KOLKATA vs. M/S. DEY'S MEDICAL (U.P.) PVT. LTD., , KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed

ITA 1703/KOL/2018[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 Nov 2023AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2005-06

For Appellant: Shri P. P. Barman, Addl. CIT, Sr. DRFor Respondent: Shri J. P. Khaitan, Sr. Advocate & Shri P
Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 40Section 44A

TDS 2 Dey’s Medical (UP) Pvt. ltd. AY 2005-06 u/s 194C by inappropriately accepting contention of the assessee that such disallowance should be qualified for non deduction u/s 194C. 3. That on the fact and in the circumstances of the case the Ld.CIT(A) erred in deleting the addition on account of sales promotion expenses. Ld.CIT(A) inappropriately

DCIT,CIRCLE-15(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S L.G.W. LIMITED, NORTH 24 PARGANAS

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 1786/KOL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Oct 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Sainiassessment Year :2012-13 Dcit, Circle-15(2), V/S. M/S L.G.W. Ltd., 10, Shantipally, Em Vill. Narayanpur, P.O. Bypass, Aayakar Rajarhat, Gopalpur, 24- Bhawan, Poorva, 6Th Parganas (North), West Floor, R.No.615, Bengal-700136 Kolkata-700 107 [Pan No.Aaacl 4670 N] .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Shri G. Mallikarjuna, Cit- अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/By Appellant Dr Shri A.K. Tibrerwal, Ar ""यथ" क" ओर से/By Respondent 09-07-2018 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing 05-10-2018 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement आदेश /O R D E R Per S.S.Godara:- This Revenue’S Appeal For Assessment Year 2012-13 Is Directed Against The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-5, Kolkata’S Order Dated 29.06.2016, Passed In Case No.47/Cit(A)-5/Cir.14(1)/15-16, In Proceedings U/S. 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961; In Short ‘The Act’. Heard Both The Parties Case File Perused. 2. The Revenue’S First Substantive Ground Challenges Correctness Of The Cit(A)’S Action Reversing Assessment Findings Disallowing The Taxpayer’S Commission Payments Made To Foreign Export Agents Amounting To ₹257,60,898/- For Non Deduction Of Tds U/S 40(A)(I) As Follows:- “1. Commission To Foreign Agents - Rs.2,57,60,898/- The Ao Has Added Sum Of Rs.2,57,60,898/- By Holding That The Said Amounts Were Paid To Foreign Agents Without Deduction Of Tds U/S.195. The Addition Has Been Made U/S

Section 1Section 143(3)Section 195Section 40Section 9Section 9(1)Section 9(1)(vi)

57,60,898 made by the Assessing Officer relying on the provision of section 40(a)(ia) of the Act, on the ITA No.1786/Kol/2016 A.Y. 2012-13 DCIT Cir-15(2), Kol. Vs. M/s L.G.W. Ltd. Page 3 alleged ground that the Appellant Company failed to deduct TDS

EXIMCORP INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED. ,KOLKATA vs. ACIT,CIR-5(2),KOLKATA. , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 701/KOL/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Aug 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav, Vice- & Sri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 115JSection 195Section 195(1)Section 2Section 40

57,310/- and book profit of Rs. 4,42,73,900/- u/s 115JB of the Act. In this year also the assessee was engaged in the business of importing and selling of wood panel products etc. Even in this year, it was noticed that the assessee had debited on account of usance interest and L.C. confirmation charges amounting

EXIMCORP INDIA (P) LTD. ,KOLKATA vs. ACIT,CIR-5(2),KOLKATA. , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 702/KOL/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Aug 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav, Vice- & Sri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 115JSection 195Section 195(1)Section 2Section 40

57,310/- and book profit of Rs. 4,42,73,900/- u/s 115JB of the Act. In this year also the assessee was engaged in the business of importing and selling of wood panel products etc. Even in this year, it was noticed that the assessee had debited on account of usance interest and L.C. confirmation charges amounting

DCIT, CIRCLE - 57, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. HEIGHT INSURANCE SERVICES LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of revenue is dismissed

ITA 1939/KOL/2010[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Oct 2015AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Am]

For Appellant: Dr. Adhir Kumar Bar, CIT, DRFor Respondent: Shri R. N. Bajoria, Sr. Advocate
Section 133ASection 194Section 194CSection 194DSection 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

57,368/- and the bifurcation of this payment is Rs.59,11,97,368/- as operating expenses and Rs.35,29,60,000/- as service charges. The assessee deducted TDS on total payment @ 2% considering the nature of payments as contractual payments under the provisions of section

DEBOTTOR TRUST ESTATE OF RAMMOHAN MULLICK,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD - 43(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 217/KOL/2016[2003-2004]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata11 Jan 2017AY 2003-2004

Bench: Shri A.T.Varkey & Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 57

57 of the Act. However it was submitted that the trust is not registered under section 12A of the Act and consequently there is no question for claiming the exemption under section 11 of the Act. Therefore the observation of the AO for reopening the case u/s 147 of the Act that the assessee has claimed exemption

JANARDAN NIRMAN PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. JCIT,(TDS), RANGE-57, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1822/KOL/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata12 Jan 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri M.Balaganesh, Am ] I.T.A No. 1822/Kol/2016 Assessment Year : 2010-11 Janardan Nirman Pvt. Ltd. -Vs- Ito, Ward-1(1), Burdwan [Pan: Aaccj 0540 R] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Subash Agarwal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Arindam Bhattacharjee, Addl. CIT
Section 200(3)Section 272A(2)(k)

Section 200(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, dated 18.10.2011, passed by Learned JCIT(TDS), Range- 57, Kolkata. 2. For that

DCIT, CIRCLE - 8(1), KOLKATA vs. M/S. TM INTERNATIONAL LOGISTICS LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed and the cross objection of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 2567/KOL/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata24 Mar 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri J. Sudhakar Reddy, Am & Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

Section 37Section 80I

TDS provisions of the Act could not have been applied in any manner. On such facts of the matter, I find the A.O was on a wrong notion in applying the provisions of section 40(a)(ia) in making the impugned disallowance. In view of the foregoing, the A.O is directed to delete the impugned disallowance/addition of Rs.1,57

SUBHAG MERCANTILE (P) LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ITO, TDS WD-59(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, assessee’s appeal stands allowed

ITA 165/KOL/2016[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata14 Jun 2018AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Raviassessment Year :2004-05

Section 194Section 194ISection 201Section 201(1)

section 201(1A) of the Act only. 6. Aggrieved, assessee preferred an appeal before Ld. CIT(A). The assessee before Ld. CIT(A) submitted that the observation of AO that assessee failed to deduct TDS on interest payment to different companies is based on wrong-assumption of facts. As such, assessee has deducted TDS on the interest expense

GIFFORD & PARTNERS LTD.(SINCE MERGED WITH GIFFORD LLP),KOLKATA vs. ADIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) - 1(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result ITA No.1489/Kol/11 is partly allowed

ITA 1489/KOL/2011[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata06 Apr 2016AY 2005-06

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Am] Assessment Year : 2007-08

For Appellant: Shri S.K.Agarwal, FCAFor Respondent: Shri G.Mallikarjuna, CIT (DR)
Section 143(3)Section 144C

57,39,112 to tax, after setting off brought forward losses of Rs.2,240,274. The Assessee also claimed credit of TDS of Rs. 44,04,830. The said return was filed by the Assessee, on the basis that, its entire profits from execution of contract with GRSE, were attributable to its PE in India. As such, the entire profits

GIFFORD & PARTNERS LTD.(SINCE MERGED WITH GIFFORD LLP),KOLKATA vs. DDIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION - 1(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result ITA No.1489/Kol/11 is partly allowed

ITA 2082/KOL/2010[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata06 Apr 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Am] Assessment Year : 2007-08

For Appellant: Shri S.K.Agarwal, FCAFor Respondent: Shri G.Mallikarjuna, CIT (DR)
Section 143(3)Section 144C

57,39,112 to tax, after setting off brought forward losses of Rs.2,240,274. The Assessee also claimed credit of TDS of Rs. 44,04,830. The said return was filed by the Assessee, on the basis that, its entire profits from execution of contract with GRSE, were attributable to its PE in India. As such, the entire profits

I.T.O WD - 7(2),KOLKATA., KOLKATA vs. M/S WINSOME BREWERIES LIMITED, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of revenue is dismissed

ITA 622/KOL/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Dec 2015AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Shri M. Balaganesh, Am]

For Appellant: Shri Shital C. Das, JCIT, Sr. DRFor Respondent: Shri Manoj Kataruka, Advocate
Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 194JSection 40

TDS) (2006) 281 ITR 99 (Bom), wherein it is held that supply of printed materials constitutes sale under the sale of Goods Act; and section 194C of the Act is not applicable. In that case it 5 Winsome Breweries Ltd. AY 2009-10 was held that supply of printed packaging labels merely because the printing was done as per requirement/specifications

DCIT, CIRCLE - 1, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. MCNALLY SAYAJI ENGINEERING LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 1575/KOL/2011[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Mar 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm]

For Appellant: Smt. Shreya Loyalka, CAFor Respondent: Md. Ghayas Uddin, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 14A

57,386/-. Accordingly, total disallowance u/s 14A of the Act read with Rule 8D of the 3 ITA Nos.2776/A/2011,1575/K/2011 & 927/K/.2013 Mc Nally Sayaji Engg. Ltd.., AY 2008-09 & 2009-10 Rules worked out to Rs. 2,73,558/-. The ld CIT(A) sustained the disallowance made by the ld AO. Aggrieved, the assessee is in appeal before

MC NALLY SAYAJI ENGINEERING LIMITED,NORTH 24 PARGANAS vs. D.C.I.T CIR - 1,KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 927/KOL/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Mar 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm]

For Appellant: Smt. Shreya Loyalka, CAFor Respondent: Md. Ghayas Uddin, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 14A

57,386/-. Accordingly, total disallowance u/s 14A of the Act read with Rule 8D of the 3 ITA Nos.2776/A/2011,1575/K/2011 & 927/K/.2013 Mc Nally Sayaji Engg. Ltd.., AY 2008-09 & 2009-10 Rules worked out to Rs. 2,73,558/-. The ld CIT(A) sustained the disallowance made by the ld AO. Aggrieved, the assessee is in appeal before

INDO NABIN PROJECTS LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR-10, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result the appeal of the assesse is partly allowed for statistical purpose as stated above

ITA 1323/KOL/2015[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Aug 2016AY 2011-2012

Bench: : Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

For Appellant: Smiriti Ranjan Bhattachary & Sh.Sujay Kr. Basak, ARFor Respondent: Shri Jungiv, JCIT
Section 143

57,050/-under section 143 (3) of the act wherein the assessing officer made several additions. 4. The appellant assessee raised the ground no-1as under: on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the learned CIT-A – 4 Kolkata was wrong in conforming the disallowance of the commission of Rs.2,58,315.000 disregarding