BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “TDS”+ Section 56(2)(viib)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chandigarh52Mumbai26Delhi22Chennai9Bangalore5Visakhapatnam4Jaipur3Ahmedabad3Hyderabad2Agra2Indore2Kolkata2Cuttack1Pune1Raipur1Rajkot1Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 2634Section 143(3)3Section 563Section 1443Section 682Section 1312Section 68o2

TRIMEX FISCAL SERVICES PVT. LTD., ,KOLKATA vs. PR.CIT - 2, KOLKATA , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 892/KOL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Nov 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am]

Section 143(3)Section 263Section 56

2. Applicability of Section 56 sub The share have been issued by the clause viib. company at fair value the valuation certificate of which was obtained from a Chartered Accountant. Copy of Valuation Certificate issued by the Chartered Accountant is enclosed herewith. 3. Details of squared off loan No loans were squared off during the year 4. Details of certain

INCOME TAX OFFICER, AAYAKAR BHAWAN, POORVA vs. AMODINI VYAPAR PVT LTD, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1481/KOL/2024[2012-13]Status: Disposed
ITAT Kolkata
31 Dec 2024
AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm Amodini Vyapar Pvt. Ltd. Income Tax Officer, Kalpanalaya, Avirampur, Po- 7Th Floor, Nadt Building, Aaykar Bhavan Poorva, 110 Shantipally, Budge Budge, Vs. Kolkata-700107 Kolkata-700137, West Bengal (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aacca2332G Assessee By : Shri Sunil Surana, Ar Revenue By : Shri Pradip Kumar Biswas, Dr Date Of Hearing: 26.11.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 31.12.2024

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Surana, ARFor Respondent: Shri Pradip Kumar Biswas, DR
Section 131Section 131(1)Section 142(1)Section 144Section 14ASection 68Section 68o

TDS has been deducted on such expenses and reflected in thereturn of income of the contractors. The increase in turnover, addition of new line of business, i.e., processing of rice and substantial increase in the fixed asset are vital indicators of plausibility of the explanation offered by the assessee in this regard. In this factual matrix, in the absence