BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “TDS”+ Section 32Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai32Hyderabad19Delhi18Kolkata9Indore8Bangalore3Chennai1Pune1SC1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)8Section 36(2)6Deduction6Depreciation6Section 143(1)3Addition to Income3Section 36(2)(i)2Section 2502Section 1542Section 90

D.C.I.T CIR - 1,KOLATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S PARIJAT VYAPAAR PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 2241/KOL/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata19 Feb 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi

Section 143(3)

section 32A of the Act. The issue before us has been answered by the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka (supra), so we do not find any infirmity in the order of the Ld. CIT(A) in allowing depreciation @ 30% on dumper and tipper. Therefore, we uphold the same. This appeal of Revenue is dismissed.” Accordingly, respectfully following the consistent

D.C.I.T CIR - 1,KOLATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S PARIJAT VYAPAAR PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 2242/KOL/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata19 Feb 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi

2
Disallowance2
Section 143(3)

section 32A of the Act. The issue before us has been answered by the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka (supra), so we do not find any infirmity in the order of the Ld. CIT(A) in allowing depreciation @ 30% on dumper and tipper. Therefore, we uphold the same. This appeal of Revenue is dismissed.” Accordingly, respectfully following the consistent

NEETU AGARWAL,KOLKATA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER - WARD 7(1), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 67/KOL/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Sept 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rakesh Mishraassessment Year: 2020-21

For Appellant: Puja Agarwal, C.AFor Respondent: Abhishek Kumar, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 143(1)Section 154Section 234BSection 250Section 90

TDS of Rs. 3,60,000/-, TCS of Rs. 34,800/- and Foreign Taxes of Rs. 3,27,574/-. The ROI was processed by the Centralized Processing Centre ('CPC') electronically and an intimation u/s 143(1) of the Act dated 24 December 2021 was issued, 3 Neetu Agarwal AY: 2020-21 however in the same, the credit of foreign

ACIT, CIRCLE-10(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S SARASWATY PRESS LTD., KOLKATA

ITA 1793/KOL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Jul 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 143(3)Section 36(2)Section 36(2)(i)

TDS as the impugned expenditure pertaining to supply of materials. We quote section 194C Explanation (iv)(e) of the Act in this backdrop to conclude that there is no specific finding in lower authorities’ orders under challenge that the assessee had, in fact, supplied the necessary material to its payees for manufacture or supply purposes. We therefore conclude that

M/S SARASWATY PRESS LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE-10, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

ITA 2220/KOL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Jul 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

Section 143(3)Section 36(2)Section 36(2)(i)

TDS as the impugned expenditure pertaining to supply of materials. We quote section 194C Explanation (iv)(e) of the Act in this backdrop to conclude that there is no specific finding in lower authorities’ orders under challenge that the assessee had, in fact, supplied the necessary material to its payees for manufacture or supply purposes. We therefore conclude that

DCIT, CIRCLE - 10, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. ICI INDIA LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal is partly allowed

ITA 1019/KOL/2007[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Jun 2016AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri N.V.Vasudevan & Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 143(3)

TDS and Advance Tax for the purpose of calculation of interest u/s 234B and 234C of the Act. ITA No.2613/Kol/05,488/Kol/06, 1019 & 852/Kol/07 AYs 02-03 & 03-04 ACIT Cir-10 Kol. v. AKZO Novel India Ltd. Page 27 48. At the outset, it was observed that similar issue in assessee’s own case in ITA No.2612/Kol/2005 dated

M/S. ICI INDIA LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 10, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal is partly allowed

ITA 488/KOL/2006[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Jun 2016AY 2002-03

Bench: Shri N.V.Vasudevan & Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 143(3)

TDS and Advance Tax for the purpose of calculation of interest u/s 234B and 234C of the Act. ITA No.2613/Kol/05,488/Kol/06, 1019 & 852/Kol/07 AYs 02-03 & 03-04 ACIT Cir-10 Kol. v. AKZO Novel India Ltd. Page 27 48. At the outset, it was observed that similar issue in assessee’s own case in ITA No.2612/Kol/2005 dated

M/S. ICI INDIA LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 10, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal is partly allowed

ITA 852/KOL/2007[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Jun 2016AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri N.V.Vasudevan & Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 143(3)

TDS and Advance Tax for the purpose of calculation of interest u/s 234B and 234C of the Act. ITA No.2613/Kol/05,488/Kol/06, 1019 & 852/Kol/07 AYs 02-03 & 03-04 ACIT Cir-10 Kol. v. AKZO Novel India Ltd. Page 27 48. At the outset, it was observed that similar issue in assessee’s own case in ITA No.2612/Kol/2005 dated

ACIT, CIRCLE - 10, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. ICI INDIA LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal is partly allowed

ITA 2613/KOL/2005[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Jun 2016AY 2002-03

Bench: Shri N.V.Vasudevan & Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 143(3)

TDS and Advance Tax for the purpose of calculation of interest u/s 234B and 234C of the Act. ITA No.2613/Kol/05,488/Kol/06, 1019 & 852/Kol/07 AYs 02-03 & 03-04 ACIT Cir-10 Kol. v. AKZO Novel India Ltd. Page 27 48. At the outset, it was observed that similar issue in assessee’s own case in ITA No.2612/Kol/2005 dated