MADHUSUDANKATI SAMABAY KRISHI UNNAYAN SAMITY LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WD-49(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed
ITA 420/KOL/2014[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata14 Jul 2017AY 2010-2011
Bench: Hon’Ble Shri A.T.Varkey, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am ] I.T.A Nos. 420/Kol/2014 Assessment Year : 2010-11 Madhusudankati Samabay Vs. I.T.O.Ward 49(1), Kolkata Krishi Unnayan Samity’ Ltd. Pan : Aaaam 7591 F] (Respondent) (Appellant) For The Appellant : Kakoli Das, Ito For The Respondent : Arvind Agarwal, Advocate Date Of Hearing : 23.06.2017. Date Of Pronouncement : 14.07.2017
For Appellant: Kakoli Das, ITOFor Respondent: Arvind Agarwal, Advocate
Section 143(3)Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(e)
47,48,153
c) Loading & Unloading
12,609
d) Carrying
3,17,727 d) Godown rent
18,134
e) Loading & Unloading 36,838
e) Commission f) Trading Cost
1,11,214 i) BENFED - 175826
ii) Ritwi India - 600
iii) IFFCO TOKIO
4117
Gen. Insurance
1,80,543
Total
56,34,895
Total 72,46,596
The ld AO show caused
