BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

81 results for “TDS”+ Section 197clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi361Mumbai286Bangalore272Chennai122Karnataka114Raipur87Kolkata81Chandigarh62Hyderabad60Jaipur53Ranchi29Ahmedabad24Lucknow16Jodhpur16Indore13Surat12Cuttack10Pune9Varanasi8Allahabad7Guwahati6Nagpur6Cochin6Rajkot5Telangana4Visakhapatnam3Jabalpur3Patna3SC3Agra1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)87Section 4082Disallowance46Deduction43TDS43Section 194C37Addition to Income37Section 14A27Section 26321Section 201

M/S TWENTY FIRST CENTURY SECURITIES LTD.,KOLKATA vs. THE ITO, WD-59(4) (TDS), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result both the appeals are allowed

ITA 464/KOL/2014[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata03 Feb 2017AY 2008-2009

Bench: Hon’Ble Sri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Am ]

For Appellant: Shri Ravi Tulsiyan, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Sallong Yaden, Addl. CIT(DR)
Section 194ASection 197Section 20Section 201

section 197(2) of the Act does not make any reference to any income specified in such certificate. A perusal of Rule 28AA(2) of the Rules also shows that the certificate issued u/s 197 of the Act will be valid for the assessment year specified in the certificate. Even in the rules there is no reference to the payment

Showing 1–20 of 81 · Page 1 of 5

21
Section 19718
Section 19515

M/S. ANUBHAV INFRASTRUCTURE LTD., ,HOWRAH vs. PRINCIPAL CIT, KOLKATA - 5, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for AY 2013-14 is partly allowed and the appeal of the assessee for AY 2014-15 is allowed

ITA 1368/KOL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata11 Mar 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Shri Girish Agrawal, Am]

Section 143(3)Section 197Section 263

section 197 certificate) flows from incorrect understanding of the elementary facts i.e. certificates u/s 197 is not issued to the deductor (assessee in this case). So, it is noted that Ld PCIT has misdirected himself by misconstruing the reply of AO (TDS

M/S ANUBHAV INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.,HOWRAH vs. A.C.I.T.,CIRCLE-13(1), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for AY 2013-14 is partly allowed and the appeal of the assessee for AY 2014-15 is allowed

ITA 941/KOL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata11 Mar 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Shri Girish Agrawal, Am]

Section 143(3)Section 197Section 263

section 197 certificate) flows from incorrect understanding of the elementary facts i.e. certificates u/s 197 is not issued to the deductor (assessee in this case). So, it is noted that Ld PCIT has misdirected himself by misconstruing the reply of AO (TDS

PATTON INTERNATIONAL LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. PCIT-1, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 261/KOL/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata22 Nov 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2017-18 M/S. Patton International Principal Commissioner Of Ltd., C/O Jain Vinod K & Income-Tax, Kolkata-1. Associates, 41A, A. J. C. Vs Bose Road, Diamond . Prestige Nirman, 6Th Floor, Suite No.613, Kolkata- 700017 (Pan: Aabcp7901M) (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Vinod Kumar Jain, ARFor Respondent: Shri Amitava Bhattacharyya, CIT, DR
Section 143(3)Section 197Section 263Section 40Section 80G

TDS u/s. 192 of the Act. We also note that issue relating to compliance of section 197 of the Companies

MANJU CHOUDHARY,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T.,CIRCLE-38, KOLKATA

In the result, we cancel this order and allow the appeal of the assessee

ITA 893/KOL/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata04 Dec 2020AY 2007-08

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Sri S.S. Godara)

Section 143(3)Section 154Section 194ASection 197Section 250Section 40

Section 197(1B) as he did not deduct TDS from the payment of interest to loan creditors and hence she is liable

INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. MARKETING DIVISION (EASTERN REGION),KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 58 (TDS)/KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 1517/KOL/2009[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Jul 2016AY 2002-03

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi

Section 133ASection 194CSection 201Section 201(1)

TDS provision. However AO has disregarded the plea of the assessee and while doing so the AO also considered certain clauses of the agreement. The reasons for the rejections are enumerated as under:- i) M/s BRPL written a letter to the assessee that it has not obtained any certificate under section 197

ASHOK KUMAR AGARWAL,JHARKHAND vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-3, ASANSOL, ASANSOL

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 1701/KOL/2014[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Oct 2015AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Shri M. Balaganesh, Am]

For Appellant: Shri Soumitra Chowdhury, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Mukherjee, JCIT
Section 131Section 143(3)

TDS since these companies obtained certificate under section 197 of Income Tax Act, 1961. 16. Going by detailed reasons recorded

M/S. EVEREADY INDUSTRIES INDIA LTD.,KOLKATA vs. PR.CIT-4, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 805/KOL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Dec 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am]

Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 263

TDS certificate issued in Form 16B by the purchaser of the packet tea factory. The ld. AR therefore submitted that it was factually incorrect on the Ld. Pr. CIT’s part to hold that the AO had 27 Eveready Industries India Ltd, AY- 2014-15 not conducted any enquiry with reference to CASS reason before completion of assessment

M/S PEERLESS HOSPITEX HOSPITAL AND RESERCH CENTRE LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WD-11(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1107/KOL/2014[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata11 Jul 2018AY 2009-2010

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Aby. T. Varkey, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am ] I.T.A No. 1107/Kol/2014 Assessment Years : 2009-10 M/S Peerless Hospitex Hospital & Research Centre Ltd. -Vs- Ito, Ward-11(1), Kolkata [Pan: Aabcp 7225 L ] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Adv. (AR)For Respondent: Shri P. K. Srihari, CIT(DR)
Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 197(1)Section 40

TDS officer by preferring an application in Form No. 13 seeking for lower / nil deduction certificate u/s 197(1) of the Act. In the instant case, section

SHREYANS OVERSEAS PVT. LTD.,,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD - 8(2),, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2454/KOL/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata03 Nov 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 201Section 250Section 263Section 40

section 197 of the Act dated 01.04.2010 for the financial year 2010-11 issued by the ITO (TDS), Ward 59(3), Kolkata

SHREYANS OVERSEAS PVT. LTD., ,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD - 8(2), , KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2455/KOL/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata03 Nov 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 201Section 250Section 263Section 40

section 197 of the Act dated 01.04.2010 for the financial year 2010-11 issued by the ITO (TDS), Ward 59(3), Kolkata

GLOSTER LTD(FORMERLY KNOWN AS KETTLEWELL BULLEN & CO. LTD,KOLKATA vs. PCIT-2, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 519/KOL/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Apr 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2018-19

For Appellant: Shri Soumen Adak, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Abhijit Kundu, CIT
Section 115JSection 143Section 143(3)Section 194JSection 263Section 40Section 74

TDS based on percentage of net profit as specified in section 197 of the Companies Act, 2013. Ld. Counsel contended

DHARAM CHAND CHAUDHRY,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 33, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1220/KOL/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Oct 2015AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Shri M. Balaganesh, Am]

For Appellant: Md. Ghayas Uddin, JCIT, Sr. DRFor Respondent: Dr. Bishnu Sankar Kundu, FCA
Section 143(3)Section 194ASection 194CSection 40

197/- for non-deduction of TDS u/s. 194C of the Act by invoking the provisions of section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. For this

HALDIA PETROCHEMICALS LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR-57, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 66/KOL/2014[2004-2005]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata03 Aug 2016AY 2004-2005

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan, Jm & Shri M. Balaganesh, Am]

For Appellant: Shri H. Chakraborty, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sallong Yaden, Addl. CIT
Section 194ISection 197(1)Section 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

TDS officer by preferring an application in Form No. 13 seeking for lower / nil deduction certificate u/s 197(1) of the Act. In the instant case, section

I.T.O WD - 7(2),KOLKATA., KOLKATA vs. M/S WINSOME BREWERIES LIMITED, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of revenue is dismissed

ITA 622/KOL/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Dec 2015AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Shri M. Balaganesh, Am]

For Appellant: Shri Shital C. Das, JCIT, Sr. DRFor Respondent: Shri Manoj Kataruka, Advocate
Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 194JSection 40

197 (Del.) 5.2.6 In Balsara Home Products Ltd. v. ITO 94 ITJ 970 (Ahd.) : The issue before Ahemadabad Tribunal was that the applicability or otherwise of Section 194C to purchase of preprinted packing materials like tubes, cartons, corrugated boxes, etc. The Assessing Officer contended that printing according to specifications settled by the assessee involves contract of work liable to TDS

MC NALLY SAYAJI ENGINEERING LIMITED,NORTH 24 PARGANAS vs. D.C.I.T CIR - 1,KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 927/KOL/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Mar 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm]

For Appellant: Smt. Shreya Loyalka, CAFor Respondent: Md. Ghayas Uddin, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 14A

197 ITR 528 (Ker) (d) Hon’ble Calcutta High Court in the case of CIT vs Gillanders Arbuthnot & Co Ltd reported in (1982) 138 ITR 763 (Cal) 14.3. In response to this, the ld DR argued that the provisions of section 36(2) of the Act were not complied with by the assessee for claiming deduction in respect of TDS

DCIT, CIRCLE - 1, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. MCNALLY SAYAJI ENGINEERING LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 1575/KOL/2011[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata10 Mar 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm]

For Appellant: Smt. Shreya Loyalka, CAFor Respondent: Md. Ghayas Uddin, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 14A

197 ITR 528 (Ker) (d) Hon’ble Calcutta High Court in the case of CIT vs Gillanders Arbuthnot & Co Ltd reported in (1982) 138 ITR 763 (Cal) 14.3. In response to this, the ld DR argued that the provisions of section 36(2) of the Act were not complied with by the assessee for claiming deduction in respect of TDS

DCIT, CIR-22, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S DELOITTE HASKINS & SELLS, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal filed by Revenue (in ITA No

ITA 588/KOL/2016[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata11 Jul 2018AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.587 & 588/Kol/2016 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2010-11 & 2011-12) D.C.I.T, Circle-22, Kolkata Vs. M/S. Deloitte Haskins & Sells

For Appellant: Shri S. Dasgupta, Addl. CIT, Sr. DRFor Respondent: Shri Percy Pardiwalla, Adv. & Niraj Sheth, Adv
Section 143(3)Section 194ISection 194JSection 37(1)Section 40

section 194J is the ingredient of “income comprised therein”. If no income is reflected in the balance sheet and P&L A/c of HSL towards the reimbursement charges paid on cost to cost basis by KSL and ML, it ceases to have the character of income. As such, the assessee cannot be treated as the assessee in default

DCIT, CIR-22, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S DELOITTE HASKINS & SELLS, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal filed by Revenue (in ITA No

ITA 587/KOL/2016[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata11 Jul 2018AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.587 & 588/Kol/2016 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2010-11 & 2011-12) D.C.I.T, Circle-22, Kolkata Vs. M/S. Deloitte Haskins & Sells

For Appellant: Shri S. Dasgupta, Addl. CIT, Sr. DRFor Respondent: Shri Percy Pardiwalla, Adv. & Niraj Sheth, Adv
Section 143(3)Section 194ISection 194JSection 37(1)Section 40

section 194J is the ingredient of “income comprised therein”. If no income is reflected in the balance sheet and P&L A/c of HSL towards the reimbursement charges paid on cost to cost basis by KSL and ML, it ceases to have the character of income. As such, the assessee cannot be treated as the assessee in default

M/S. A.K. INDUSTRIES ,HOWRAH vs. ACIT, CIRCLE - 46, KOLKATA , KOLKATA

The appeal is dismissed

ITA 665/KOL/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata19 Feb 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Sainiassessment Year :2009-10

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 154Section 194CSection 234BSection 40

TDS u/s. 194C of the Act on various head(s) of payments. The CIT(A)’s detailed discussion to this effect reads as follows:- “4. "ल"खत ""ब"ट / Written submission The A/R of the appellant submitted written submission, to substantiate its claim, which is re-produced as under: "We write the above references, wherein the A. O. has instructed