BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “TDS”+ Section 194Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Bangalore39Mumbai18Delhi9Indore9Chennai7Panaji5Kolkata4Ahmedabad4Cochin3Pune2SC2Telangana1Amritsar1Karnataka1Kerala1Lucknow1Rajkot1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 271C11Section 1544Section 199(3)4Section 143(3)3Section 1153Section 194B3Section 143(1)3Deduction3TDS3Section 201(1)

M/S. FUTURE DISTRIBUTORS,KOLKATA vs. PR.CIT, KOLKATA - 9, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 277/KOL/2016[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 Jul 2016AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

Section 131Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 263Section 40

TDS on reimbursement is found to be not acceptable, the deduction of tax at source, if any, was required to be done as per the provisions of section 194B

ITO, WD-2(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S LIVER FOUNDATION, KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal stands dismissed

2
Rectification u/s 1542
ITA 459/KOL/2016[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Nov 2017AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Raviassessment Year:2010-11 Income Tax Officer, M/S Liver Foundation, बनाम Ward-2(2)/Tds/Kolkata, 12, Dr. M. Ishaque / V/S. 10B, Middleton Row, 7Th Road, (Kyd Street), Floor, Kolkata-71 Kolkata-16 [Pan Callo 23274 B] .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ" /Respondent Shri Arindam Bhttacharjee, Addl. Cit-Dr अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/By Appellant None ""यथ" क" ओर से/By Respondent 01-11-2017 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing 15-11-2017 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement आदेश /O R D E R Per Waseem Ahmed:- This Appeal By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-24, Kolkata Dated 30.12.2015. Assessment Was Framed By Ito Ward-58(3)/Tds, Kolkata U/S 201(1)/201(1A) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Act’) Vide His Order Dated 26.12.2009 For Assessment Year 2009-10. Penalty Levied By Jcit(Tds), Range-58, Kolkata U/S 271C Of The Act. 2. At The Time Of Hearing None Appeared On Behalf Of Assessee Though Notice Of Hearing Was Sent To Assessee Through Rpad. So We Decided To Hear The Present Appeal Without Appearance Of Assessee Or By Ld. Authorized Representative For The Assessee & After Hearing Ld. Dr. 3. The Only Issue Raised By The Revenue In This Appeal Is That Ld Cit(A) Erred In Confirming The Penalty Imposed By The Ao For Rs. 26,52,615.00 U/S 271C Of The Act

Section 115Section 194BSection 194JSection 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

section (1), shall be imposed by the [Joint] Commissioner From the above it is apparent that the penalty u/s 271C can be levied only for non-deduction. In case of failure to pay the tax as required u/s. 115-O(2) and Second proviso Sec. 194B the penalty u/s. 271C can also be imposed. In the appellant’s case

SANDERSONS & MORGANS,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE - 54, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1520/KOL/2009[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata23 Sept 2015AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am] Assessment Year : 2004-05 (Appellant ) (Respondent) Sandersans & Morgans -Versus- A.C.I.T., Circle-54, Kolkata Kolkata (Pan:Abbfs 4291 B) For The Appellant : Shri J.P.Khaitan & Shri S.Basu, Advocate For The Respondent : Shri D.Banerjee, Jcit Date Of Hearing : 21.09.2015. Date Of Pronouncement : 23.09.2015 Order Per Shri M.Balaganesh, Am 1. This Appeal Of The Revenue Arises Out Of The Order Of The Learned Cita In Appeal No. 85/Cit(A)-Xxxvii/Acit-54/08-09. Dated 18.03.2009 For The Asst Year 2004-05 Arising Out Of The Order Of The Learned Assessing Officer Framed U/S 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’).

For Appellant: Shri J.P.Khaitan & Shri S.Basu, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri D.Banerjee, JCIT
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 155(14)Section 199(3)

TDS was sought to be modified through clauses 56 and 59 of the Finance Bill, 2002 and the same have also been explained in the Memorandum explaining the provisions of the Finance Bill to state that: "Under the existing provisions of section 199 of the Income-tax Act, any deduction made in accordance with the provisions of sections

TURNER MORRISON LTD. ,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR, KOL, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 530/KOL/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata07 Feb 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2020-21

For Appellant: Shri Miraj D. Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri S. Datta, CIT, DR
Section 143(1)

194B and 194BB, respectively. 8.2 Likewise, payments made to contractors and insurance commission, payments made in respect of life insurance policy, and payments made to the non-resident sportsmen or sports associations are liable for deduction to tax at source under Sections 194C, 194D, 194DA, and 194E, respectively. 8.3 As far as payments made to non-residents [not being