BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

227 results for “TDS”+ Section 145clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai573Delhi466Kolkata227Bangalore212Chennai149Karnataka114Chandigarh111Hyderabad98Jaipur96Ahmedabad92Cochin73Pune53Raipur40Lucknow40Ranchi34Visakhapatnam31Surat30Indore27Agra22Amritsar19Rajkot17Jodhpur14Dehradun12Allahabad12Nagpur11Patna8Guwahati8Varanasi6Panaji3Calcutta2Jabalpur2SC2J&K1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)89Section 6857Addition to Income57TDS40Disallowance39Section 14736Section 14A36Section 80I33Section 153A27Survey u/s 133A

SWAPAN DAS,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O.,WARD-45(3), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1333/KOL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata06 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2014-15 Swapan Das Income Tax Officer, Ward- 3F/1G, Gagan Sarkar Road, Vs. 45(3), Kolkata. Beliaghata, Kolkata-700010. (Pan Agrpd2980P) (Appellant) (Respondent) Present For: Appellant By : Smt. Pinki Shaw, Fca Respondent By : Shri Sudip Kumar Bandopadhyay, Addl. Cit Date Of Hearing : 23.06.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 06.09.2022 O R D E R Per Girish Agrawal: This Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Ld. Cit(A)-13, Kolkata Vide Appeal No.10542/Cit(A)-13/Wd- 45(3)/Kol/2016-17 Dated 28.02.2019 For A.Y. 2014-15 Arising Out Of Order Passed U/S. 143(3) Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Act’) By Ito, Ward-45(3), Kolkata Dated 28.12.2016. 2. Smt. Pinki Shaw, Fca Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee & Shri Sudip Kumar Bandopadhyay, Addl. Cit Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue.

For Appellant: Smt. Pinki Shaw, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Sudip Kumar Bandopadhyay, Addl. CIT
Section 143(3)

TDS on various expenses, it was submitted that expenses individually did not exceed the prescribed limits and majority of them were paid to the farmers/breeders who are out of the purview of the Act. Ld. AO completed the assessment by making the additions for which assessee went in appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). 5. In the course of first

Showing 1–20 of 227 · Page 1 of 12

...
27
Section 139(1)25
Section 14823

ACIT, CC-IV, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S INLAND ROAD TRANSPORT PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

ITA 1481/KOL/2012[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 Jun 2016AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Shri M. Balaganesh, Am]

Section 132Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 153A

TDS provisions as the tax was duly deducted at source and also paid. But, even otherwise, there was no case for invoking the provisions of section 15 I.T.A Nos. 1179, 1225-1226, 1426-1427, 1480-1482/ Kol/2012 & CO Nos.83,99,100 & 101/K/2012, Inland Road Transport Pvt. Ltd. 145

ACIT, CC-IV, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. RATAN KUMAR SOMANI, KOLKATA

ITA 1479/KOL/2012[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 Jun 2016AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Shri M. Balaganesh, Am]

Section 132Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 153A

TDS provisions as the tax was duly deducted at source and also paid. But, even otherwise, there was no case for invoking the provisions of section 15 I.T.A Nos. 1179, 1225-1226, 1426-1427, 1480-1482/ Kol/2012 & CO Nos.83,99,100 & 101/K/2012, Inland Road Transport Pvt. Ltd. 145

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - IV, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. INLAND ROAD TRANSPORT(P)LTD, KOLKATA

ITA 1179/KOL/2012[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 Jun 2016AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Shri M. Balaganesh, Am]

Section 132Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 153A

TDS provisions as the tax was duly deducted at source and also paid. But, even otherwise, there was no case for invoking the provisions of section 15 I.T.A Nos. 1179, 1225-1226, 1426-1427, 1480-1482/ Kol/2012 & CO Nos.83,99,100 & 101/K/2012, Inland Road Transport Pvt. Ltd. 145

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - IV, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S INLAND ROAD TRANSPORT(P)LTD, KOLKATA

ITA 1427/KOL/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 Jun 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Shri M. Balaganesh, Am]

Section 132Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 153A

TDS provisions as the tax was duly deducted at source and also paid. But, even otherwise, there was no case for invoking the provisions of section 15 I.T.A Nos. 1179, 1225-1226, 1426-1427, 1480-1482/ Kol/2012 & CO Nos.83,99,100 & 101/K/2012, Inland Road Transport Pvt. Ltd. 145

ACIT, CC-IV, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S INLAND ROAD TRANSPORT PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

ITA 1480/KOL/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 Jun 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Shri M. Balaganesh, Am]

Section 132Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 153A

TDS provisions as the tax was duly deducted at source and also paid. But, even otherwise, there was no case for invoking the provisions of section 15 I.T.A Nos. 1179, 1225-1226, 1426-1427, 1480-1482/ Kol/2012 & CO Nos.83,99,100 & 101/K/2012, Inland Road Transport Pvt. Ltd. 145

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - IV, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. INLAND ROAD TRANSPORT(P)LTD, KOLKATA

ITA 1226/KOL/2012[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 Jun 2016AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Shri M. Balaganesh, Am]

Section 132Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 153A

TDS provisions as the tax was duly deducted at source and also paid. But, even otherwise, there was no case for invoking the provisions of section 15 I.T.A Nos. 1179, 1225-1226, 1426-1427, 1480-1482/ Kol/2012 & CO Nos.83,99,100 & 101/K/2012, Inland Road Transport Pvt. Ltd. 145

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - IV, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. INLAND ROAD TRANSPORT(P)LTD, KOLKATA

ITA 1225/KOL/2012[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 Jun 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Shri M. Balaganesh, Am]

Section 132Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 153A

TDS provisions as the tax was duly deducted at source and also paid. But, even otherwise, there was no case for invoking the provisions of section 15 I.T.A Nos. 1179, 1225-1226, 1426-1427, 1480-1482/ Kol/2012 & CO Nos.83,99,100 & 101/K/2012, Inland Road Transport Pvt. Ltd. 145

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - IV, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S INLAND ROAD TRANSPORT (P)LTD, KOLKATA

ITA 1426/KOL/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 Jun 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Shri M. Balaganesh, Am]

Section 132Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 153A

TDS provisions as the tax was duly deducted at source and also paid. But, even otherwise, there was no case for invoking the provisions of section 15 I.T.A Nos. 1179, 1225-1226, 1426-1427, 1480-1482/ Kol/2012 & CO Nos.83,99,100 & 101/K/2012, Inland Road Transport Pvt. Ltd. 145

ACIT, CIRCLE-33, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. G. D. CONSTRUCTION & CO., KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal stands dismissed

ITA 1596/KOL/2014[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Dec 2017AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri Aby.T Varkey & Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year :2010-11

Section 143(3)Section 144

TDS were not deducted. This act of AO shows that he was provided with all the details of labour expense; v) The AO has not rejected the books of account and assessment was not framed u/s. 144 of the Act which proved that all the necessary details were produced before him during assessment proceeding; vi) The AO did not dispute

M/S RECKITT BENCKISER (I) LTD.,KOLKATA vs. JCIT, R-12, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed while both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1671/KOL/2008[2003-2004]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata25 May 2016AY 2003-2004

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

Section 40

TDS under section 194 on the reimbursement of salary of seconded I.T.A. Nos. 1671/KOL./2008 & 1024/KOL/2009 Assessment years: 2003-2004 & 2004-2005 & I.T.A. Nos. 1699/KOL/2008 & 973/KOL/2009 Assessment years: 2003-2004 & 2004-2005 Page 10 of 34 employees. Keeping in view these decisions of Coordinate Bench of this Tribunal in the case of M/s. Nagase India Pvt. Limited (supra) and Temasek

M/S. FUTURE DISTRIBUTORS,KOLKATA vs. PR.CIT, KOLKATA - 9, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 277/KOL/2016[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 Jul 2016AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

Section 131Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 263Section 40

TDS on reimbursement is found to be not acceptable, the deduction of tax at source, if any, was required to be done as per the provisions of section 194B applicable to payment of income by way of winning from any lottery, etc. and not under section 194G as held by the ld. CIT. He invited our attention to the provisions

M/S.G.S. ATWAL & CO.(ENGG) (P)LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR-11(1), KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1008/KOL/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 Apr 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rakesh Mishra

For Appellant: Shri Soumitra Choudhury, Advocate & ShriFor Respondent: Shri B. K. Singh, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 201Section 36(1)(va)

TDS cannot, in any circumstances, be termed as capital borrowed from the Income-tax department for the purpose of business. For claiming any expense as deduction, firstly it should qualify and fall within the ambit and scope of deductible expenditure as per the provisions of sections 30 to 37 of the Act. If an amount does not qualify

M/S.G.S. ATWAL & CO.(ENGG)(P)LTD,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR-11(1), KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1009/KOL/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 Apr 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rakesh Mishra

For Appellant: Shri Soumitra Choudhury, Advocate & ShriFor Respondent: Shri B. K. Singh, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 201Section 36(1)(va)

TDS cannot, in any circumstances, be termed as capital borrowed from the Income-tax department for the purpose of business. For claiming any expense as deduction, firstly it should qualify and fall within the ambit and scope of deductible expenditure as per the provisions of sections 30 to 37 of the Act. If an amount does not qualify

MUNISSH JHAJHARIA,KOLKATA vs. ITO WARD-45(2) KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2291/KOL/2019[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata07 Jul 2020AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm] Assessment Year: 2005-06

Section 144Section 145Section 147

section 145 of the Act, then the AO may make an assessment in the manner provided u/s. 144 of the Act, which is termed as the “Best Judgment Assessment’. However this is not the case wherein AO has rejected the books of account after finding any grounds as stipulated u/s 145 of the Act and thereafter resorted to estimation

ITO, WARD - 11(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. SANTHAL MULTICAST PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 2229/KOL/2010[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata04 Dec 2015AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year :2004-05

Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 145Section 209(1)(D)

TDS certificate issued by the TATA Motors and submission made by the assessee. In view of above the AO rejected the books of accounts and framed the assessment under section 144 of the Act. Aggrieved assessee preferred an appeal to CIT(A) who allowed this ground in favour of the assessee by observing as under : “I have gone through

M/S PREMIER IRRIGATION ADRITEC (P) LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CIR-11(1), KOLKATA , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 387/KOL/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 2(24)Section 250Section 3Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

TDS cannot, in any circumstances, be termed as capital borrowed from the Income Tax department for the purpose of business. For claiming anyexpense as deduction, firstly it should qualify and fall within the ambit and scope of deductible expenditure as per the provisions of section 30 to 37 of the Act. If an amount does not qualify as a deductible

ALLAHABAD BANK,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T CIR - 6,KOLKATA., KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal stands partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 306/KOL/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata08 Feb 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi

Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 14A(2)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 40

TDS details were not submitted before AO as these were not procured from the branches. He further submitted that the documents now have been collected and accordingly requested the Bench to restore the issue back to the file of Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication. Ld. DR, on the other hand, agreed to the submission of the AR. 21. We have

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 1(4), KOLKATA , KOLKATA vs. M/S. HINDUSTAN URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.(HINDUSTAN VIDYUT PRODUCT LTD.,), NEW DELHI

ITA 1615/KOL/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 Dec 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Shri, M. Balaganesh

Section 143(3)Section 195Section 246ASection 271(1)(c)Section 40Section 40ASection 9(1)(vii)

TDS certificate is essential. 6. Whether this contention is correct, is the issue to be decided. 7. In order to appreciate this contention, it is necessary to consider the relevant provisions of the Act:-- (i) Section 40(a)(i) of the Act :-- "Section 40 - Amounts not deductible: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in sections 30 to 38, the following amounts

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 1(4), KOLKATA , KOLKATA vs. M/S. HINDUSTAN URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.(HINDUSTAN VIDYUT PRODUCT LTD.,), NEW DELHI

ITA 1616/KOL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 Dec 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Shri, M. Balaganesh

Section 143(3)Section 195Section 246ASection 271(1)(c)Section 40Section 40ASection 9(1)(vii)

TDS certificate is essential. 6. Whether this contention is correct, is the issue to be decided. 7. In order to appreciate this contention, it is necessary to consider the relevant provisions of the Act:-- (i) Section 40(a)(i) of the Act :-- "Section 40 - Amounts not deductible: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in sections 30 to 38, the following amounts