BISHISTA BAGCHI,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CPC, BANGALORE
ITA 540/KOL/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Mar 2022AY 2017-18
Bench: Shri Sanjay Gargi.T.A. No.540/Kol/2021 Assessment Year: 2017-18 Bishista Bagchi..........................………………............................…….…………….....Appellant 3C, Santosh Garden, 8, Ekdalia Road, Ballygunj, Kolkata. [Pan:Ayapb6940J] Vs. Dcit, Cpc, Bengaluru………….…..…...............……........……...…..……………Respondent Appearances By: Shri Indranil Banerjee, Ar,Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Gautam Mondal, Addl. Cit-Dr,Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing :January 31, 2022 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : March 15, 2022 Hearing Through Video Conferencing Order The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 07.10.2021 Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre [Hereinafter Referred To As‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act(Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’). The Assessee In This Appeal Has Taken The Following Grounds Of Appeal:
Section 10Section 2(24)(xi)Section 250Section 56(2)(iv)Section 80C
TDS was effected u/s. 194DA of the Act on the above payment of the maturity proceeds. The moot question here is, whether an insurance policy is a capital asset or not.It is observed that the insurance policy taken by the appellant is in the nature of apension policy wherein a sum assured is given at the end of the maturity
