BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

92 results for “TDS”+ Rectification u/s 154clear

Sorted by relevance

Patna468Delhi380Mumbai295Pune223Bangalore212Chennai149Kolkata92Cochin54Ahmedabad52Chandigarh51Hyderabad44Jaipur33Visakhapatnam22Lucknow21Indore21Raipur20Agra16Nagpur16Jodhpur15Rajkot11Amritsar6Cuttack5Jabalpur4Panaji4Surat4SC1Punjab & Haryana1Telangana1Ranchi1

Key Topics

Section 154109Section 234E94Section 143(1)72TDS63Section 143(3)60Section 25058Section 200A49Rectification u/s 15446Deduction39Addition to Income

MSTC LTD,KOLKATA vs. JURISDICTIONAL ASSESSING OFFICER, CIR-1(1), KOLKATA. , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 623/KOL/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata01 Oct 2024AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishraassessment Year: 2021-22

For Appellant: Shri Prasun Bhattacharya, ARFor Respondent: Shri Manjeet Singh, CIT, DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 154Section 250

rectification u/s 154 before AO, both pendente lite and without going into the issue of the addition of contingent liability when AO had the full opportunity to do so in the scrutiny proceedings. 18. For that without prejudice to any other ground taken hereinbefore and hereinafter, the Ld. CIT(A) erred both in law and in the facts and circumstances

Showing 1–20 of 92 · Page 1 of 5

31
Section 11530
Section 26328

YASHWANT KUMAR DAGA,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CIR-30, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 263/KOL/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Jan 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Manish Boradi.T.A No.263/Kol/2022 Assessment Year: 2016-17 Yashwant Kumar Daga……………....................................................……Appellant Salarpuria Jajodia & Co., 3Rd Floor, 7, Chittaranjan Avenue, Kolkata-700072. [Pan: Afypd7477F] Vs. Acit, Circle-30, Kolkata…..…....…...................……........……...…..…..Respondent Appearances By: Shri Siddharth Jhajharia & Sujoy Sen, Ar, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Subhrajyoti Bhattacharjee, Cit-Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : January 04, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : January 16, 2023 आदेश / Order संजय गग", "या"यक सद"य "वारा / Per Sanjay Garg: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 06.12.2021 Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre [Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’). 2. The Assessee, In This Appeal, Has Taken The Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1. For That In View Of Facts & Circumstances That Ld. Cit (A) Has Erred In Not Quashing / Cancelling The Order / Part Of Order U/S 154 By Ao For Which Ao Even Did Not Issue Any Notice To Appellant & Hence Such Action Of Cit(A) Is Bad In Law & It May Be Held Accordingly.

Section 143(3)Section 154Section 250

TDS). The assessee, therefore, filed a rectification petition before the Assessing Officer u/s 154 of the Act. The Assessing Officer

MANAB SEVA SANSTHAN ,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WD-1(4), EXEMPT, KOLKATA. , KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 593/KOL/2023[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Aug 2023AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2021-22 Manav Seva Sansthan Income-Tax Officer, Ward- Unit No. 1501, 15Th Floor, 1(4), Exempt, Kolkata. Diamond Heritage Building, Vs. 16, Strand Road, Kolkata- 700001. (Pan: Aabtm7707M) (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Surana, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri B.K. Singh, JCIT (Sr.DR)
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 154

TDS credit on 29.11.2022 & 01.02.2023 and rectification order u/s 154 was passed on 24.01.2023 and 16.02.2023 wherein TDS credit was again

DCIT, KOLKATA vs. L & T FINANCE LTD, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 377/KOL/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata22 Aug 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice- & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 14ASection 249(3)Section 250

u/s 154, the Ld. ADIT has granted TDS credit of only Rs. 1,62,96,67,274/-. 1.1.It is submitted that pursuant to the approval of the scheme of arrangement and amalgamation (‘Scheme’) by the Hon’ble High Court of Calcutta vide order dated 28-11-2016 and National Company Law Tribunal (‘NCLT') of Mumbai vide order dated

L & T FINANCE LIMITED (SUCCESSOR OF L & T INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED, NOW MERGED),KOLKATA vs. CIT(A),NFAC,ITD, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 645/KOL/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata22 Aug 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice- & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 14ASection 249(3)Section 250

u/s 154, the Ld. ADIT has granted TDS credit of only Rs. 1,62,96,67,274/-. 1.1.It is submitted that pursuant to the approval of the scheme of arrangement and amalgamation (‘Scheme’) by the Hon’ble High Court of Calcutta vide order dated 28-11-2016 and National Company Law Tribunal (‘NCLT') of Mumbai vide order dated

TRINAYANI REALTORS PVT. LTD,KOLKATA vs. AO, CPC, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 399/KOL/2021[2018-19]Status: HeardITAT Kolkata02 Mar 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rajesh Kumari.T.A. No.399/Kol/2021 Assessment Year: 2018-19 Trinayani Realtors Pvt. Ltd.........................………….………………….……Appellant C/O M/S Salarpuria Jajodia & Co., 7, C.R. Avenue, 3Rd Floor, Kolkata – 700072. [Pan: Aacct4238N] Vs. A.O., Cpc.................................…….…..…...............……........……...…..…..Respondent Appearances By: Shri Siddharth Jhajharia & Sujoy Sen, Ar, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Smt. Ranu Biswas, Addl. Cit-Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : February 23, 2022 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : March 02, 2022 Hearing Through Video Conferencing Order Per Sanjay Garg: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 27.09.2021 Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’). The Assessee In This Appeal Has Taken The Following Grounds Of Appeal:

Section 143(1)Section 154Section 199Section 250

TDS of Rs.39,72,950/- only. The assessee filed rectification application u/s 154. The rectification application u/s 154 was rejected

AVISHI PROJECTS LLP ,KOLKATA vs. ADIT, CPC, BANGALORE. , BANGALORE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1249/KOL/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 Jan 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Shri S. Jhajharia, A/RFor Respondent: Shri Vineet Kumar, Addl. CIT, D/R
Section 143(1)Section 154Section 250Section 5

TDS) and tax collected at source (TCS), was not allowed in the return processed u/s 143(1)(a) of the Act against which the assessee has filed the instant appeal. The assessee had also filed application u/s 154 of the Act which was also disposed against the assessee. However, the appeal against the order u/s

MANJU CHOUDHARY,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T.,CIRCLE-38, KOLKATA

In the result, we cancel this order and allow the appeal of the assessee

ITA 893/KOL/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata04 Dec 2020AY 2007-08

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Sri S.S. Godara)

Section 143(3)Section 154Section 194ASection 197Section 250Section 40

TDS from the payment of interest to loan creditors and hence she is liable for disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act. As this disallowance was not done in the assessment order passed u/s 143(3) of the Act on 29.12.2009, the same requires rectification u/s 154

BENGAL GHG DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 5(1), KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2495/KOL/2024[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata25 Jul 2025AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubeyi.T.A. No. 2495 & 2496/Kol/2024 Assessment Years: 2020-2021 & 2021-2022 Bengal Ghg Developers Pvt. Limited,………Appellant 80, Bentinck Street, Lal Bazar, Kolkata-700001, West Bengal [Pan:Aadcb1649Q] -Vs.- Income Tax Officer,……………….……….....Respondent Ward-5(1), Kolkata, Aayakar Bhawan, P-7, Chowringhee Square, Kolkata-700069 Appearances By: Shri A.K. Keshari, A.R., Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri Kapil Mondal, Addl. Cit, Sr. D.R., Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing: July 22, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order: July 25, 2025 O R D E R

Section 154

TDs claim of the appellant of Rs.24,58,869/- to Rs.21,19,577/- only. The appellant sought rectification of the same u/s 154

BENGAL GHG DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 5(1), KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2496/KOL/2024[2021-2022]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata25 Jul 2025AY 2021-2022

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubeyi.T.A. No. 2495 & 2496/Kol/2024 Assessment Years: 2020-2021 & 2021-2022 Bengal Ghg Developers Pvt. Limited,………Appellant 80, Bentinck Street, Lal Bazar, Kolkata-700001, West Bengal [Pan:Aadcb1649Q] -Vs.- Income Tax Officer,……………….……….....Respondent Ward-5(1), Kolkata, Aayakar Bhawan, P-7, Chowringhee Square, Kolkata-700069 Appearances By: Shri A.K. Keshari, A.R., Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri Kapil Mondal, Addl. Cit, Sr. D.R., Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing: July 22, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order: July 25, 2025 O R D E R

Section 154

TDs claim of the appellant of Rs.24,58,869/- to Rs.21,19,577/- only. The appellant sought rectification of the same u/s 154

NEETU AGARWAL,KOLKATA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER - WARD 7(1), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 67/KOL/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Sept 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rakesh Mishraassessment Year: 2020-21

For Appellant: Puja Agarwal, C.AFor Respondent: Abhishek Kumar, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 143(1)Section 154Section 234BSection 250Section 90

rectification order u/s 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”), dated 08.08.2022. 2. The grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are reproduced as under: “1 Passing the order under section 250 of the Income Tax Act. 1961 ('the Act') which is bad in law and liable to be quashed. 2 Dismissing the appeal

DEEPSHIKHA TRADING COMPANY PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 6(2), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1957/KOL/2024[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata14 Jan 2025AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 143Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250

TDS of Rs. 1,23,331 and Advance Tax of Rs. 1,75,000 appearing in Form 26AS of M/s GMB Investments Pvt. Ltd. (amalgamating company). The CPC did not allow the credit in the intimation u/s 143(1). Neither was the credit allowed in the rectification order passed subsequently u/s 154

OSD, COKE (CONSORTIUM) PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. A.O., CIR. 5(1) , KOLKATA

In the result, ITA No. 1442/KOL/2023 is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1442/KOL/2023[2014-15]Status: HeardITAT Kolkata05 Mar 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Sri Anikesh Banerjee & Sri Girish Agrawal

Section 143(3)Section 154Section 199Section 199(3)Section 250Section 37B

TDS amount of Rs. 14,63,516/- was not credited by the AO in assessment proceedings. The assessee filed a rectification petition u/s 154

M/S EVERBRIGHT VINIMAY PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2150/KOL/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 Jan 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm Income Tax Officer M/S Everbright Vinimay Private Aaykar Bhavan, P-7, Limited Chowringhee Square, 64, Bentinck Street 3Rd Floor, Vs. Kolkata-700069, Kolkata-700069, West Bengal West Bengal (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aacce6379H Assessee By : Shri Abhishek Bansal, Ar Revenue By : Shri Sailen Samadder, Dr Date Of Hearing: 07.01.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 31.01.2025

For Appellant: Shri Abhishek Bansal, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sailen Samadder, DR
Section 131Section 143(1)Section 154

TDS credit and the rectification order u/s 154 of the Act was passed on 28.09.2020 in which the TDS credit

ACHHELAL YADAV,DANKUNI vs. ITO, WARD-23(1),HOOGHLY. , HOOGHLY

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 844/KOL/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata14 Dec 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 844/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2013-14 Achhelal Yadav Income Tax Officer, Ward- 23(1), G/4/3, Phase-Ii, Dankuni Housing Vs Hooghly Complex P.O. Dankuni West Bengal - 712331 [Pan: Aakpy3403B] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Sunil Surana, A/R Revenue By : Shri P.P. Barman, Addl. Cit, Sr. D/R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 10/10/2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 14/12/2023 आदेश/O R D E R Per Dr. Manish Borad: The Above Captioned Appeal Is Directed At The Instance Of The Assessee Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (Hereinafter The “Ld. Cit(A)”) Dt. 17/07/2023, Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act”) For The Assessment Year 2013-14. 2. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal:- “1. For That The Ld. Cit(A) Erred In Confirming The Order Of The Ao Passed U/S 154 When In Fact The Entire Sold Lands Were Rural Agriculture Lands & Thus The Said Lands Do Not Come Under The Purview Of The Definition Of Capital Asset As Provided Under Section 2(14)(Iii) & Thus The Entire Calculation Of Capital Gain On Sale Of Rural Agriculture Land Was Illegal, Wrong & Without Any Sanction Of Law. 2. For That The Ld. Cit(A) Erred In Confirming The Action Of Ao By Invoking The Provision Of Section 154 Of The Income Tax Act Since The Mistake, Which Was Sought To Be Rectified By The Ao, Was Not A Mistake Apparent From The Record As Prescribed Under Section 154. 2

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Surana, A/RFor Respondent: Shri P.P. Barman, Addl. CIT, Sr. D/R
Section 143(2)Section 154Section 2(14)Section 2(14)(iii)Section 250Section 54Section 54BSection 54F

rectification order no TDS was allowed for an unknown reason. 6. For that the Ld. CIT(A) erred in holding the view that the exemption was originally allowed u/s 54F and therefore the assessment is to be rectified when no exemption u/s 54F was claimed or allowed. 7. For that the order is otherwise bad in law since two opinions

BILDRITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR. -33, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 36/KOL/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata23 Sept 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

Section 143(1)Section 154

TDS credit of Rs.2,20,722/- in the return of income, however, at the time of processing return u/s 143(1) as well as in rectification order passed u/s 154

RAIGANJ CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,UTTAR DINAJPUR vs. A.C.I.T., CIRCLE - 2(2), JALPAIGURI

In the result, the appeal for A

ITA 1887/KOL/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata23 May 2025AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 115Section 143(3)Section 156Section 250Section 40

rectification u/s 154 of the Act and deleting the disallowance made u/s 154 of the Act. Therefore, as regards the change of status of the assessee from a cooperative Society to a cooperative bank, the same was allowed by the Tribunal in favour of the assessee and the same was not contested I.T.A. Nos.: 1886, 1887 & 1923/KOL/2024

RAIGANJ CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,UTTAR DINAJPUR vs. D.C.I.T., CIRCLE - 2(1), JALPAIGURI

In the result, the appeal for A

ITA 1923/KOL/2024[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata23 May 2025AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 115Section 143(3)Section 156Section 250Section 40

rectification u/s 154 of the Act and deleting the disallowance made u/s 154 of the Act. Therefore, as regards the change of status of the assessee from a cooperative Society to a cooperative bank, the same was allowed by the Tribunal in favour of the assessee and the same was not contested I.T.A. Nos.: 1886, 1887 & 1923/KOL/2024

RAIGANJ CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,UTTAR DINAJPUR vs. D.C.I.T., CIRCLE - 2(2), JALPAIGURI

In the result, the appeal for A

ITA 1886/KOL/2024[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata23 May 2025AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 115Section 143(3)Section 156Section 250Section 40

rectification u/s 154 of the Act and deleting the disallowance made u/s 154 of the Act. Therefore, as regards the change of status of the assessee from a cooperative Society to a cooperative bank, the same was allowed by the Tribunal in favour of the assessee and the same was not contested I.T.A. Nos.: 1886, 1887 & 1923/KOL/2024

SREI INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. ACIT,CIR-11(1), KOL, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1157/KOL/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 Apr 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Dr. Manish Boradi.T.A. No.1157/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2017-18 Srei Infrastructure Finance Ltd. ………. Appellant (Pan: Aaacs1425L) Vs. Acit, Circle-11(1), Kolkata ……. Respondent Appearances By: Shri S. K. Tulsiyan, Advocate & Sm. Lata Goyal, Aca Appeared For Appellant Shri S. Datta, Cit, Dr Appeared For Respondent . Date Of Hearing : 07.02.2024 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : 29.04.2024 Order Per Manish Borad: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Pertaining To The Assessment Year (In Short “Ay”) 2017-18 Is Directed Against The Order Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 In Short The “Act”) By Ld. Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi [In Short Ld. “Cit(A)”] Dated 05.09.2023 Arising Out Of The Assessment Order U/S. 154 R,W,S, 143(3) Of The Act By Acit, Circle-11(1), Kolkata Dated 12.07.2022. 2. Grounds Of Appeal Raised By The Assessee Are Reproduced As Under: “1. That On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case, The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeal), [Here- In- After Referred To As Ld. Cit(A)] Was Not Justified & Grossly Erred In Not Granting The Interest U/S. 244A Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 ('The Act').

Section 115JSection 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 154Section 244ASection 244A(2)Section 250

rectification application filed u/s. 154 of the Act, assessee had specifically raised the issue in para 6 and, therefore, Ld. CIT(A) erred in observing that assessee had not raised this issue. As far as the calculation of interest u/s. 244A of the Act is concerned, he stated that this refund is arising out of TDS