BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

123 results for “TDS”+ Rectification u/s 154clear

Sorted by relevance

Patna468Delhi419Mumbai324Pune251Bangalore217Chennai161Indore144Kolkata123Ahmedabad72Chandigarh71Hyderabad69Cochin62Jaipur42Visakhapatnam39Nagpur30Jabalpur27Raipur26Karnataka24Jodhpur24Lucknow24Surat19Agra17Rajkot16Amritsar9Allahabad9Dehradun8Guwahati8Cuttack6Panaji4Ranchi1SC1Telangana1Varanasi1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 154148Section 143(3)88Section 143(1)75TDS71Rectification u/s 15456Section 25051Section 4042Section 234E40Deduction38Addition to Income

M/S. SHREE HANUMAN SUGAR & INDUSTRIES LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-XI,KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 341/KOL/2010[1998-99]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata08 Jun 2016AY 1998-99

Bench: : Shri M.Balaganesh & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

For Appellant: Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate, Ld.ARFor Respondent: Md. Ghayas Uddin, JCIT, Ld. Sr.DR
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 154Section 234B

TDS Rs. 5,31,128/- Assessed Tax- Rs. 5,17,750/- Add Interest u/s. 234B Rs.3,15,797 Interest u/s. 234C Rs. 39,213 Rs. 3,55,010/- Rs. 8,72,760/- Less Refund of A.Y 1999-2000 Rs. 11,620/- Balance payable- Rs. 8,61,140/- Less Tax paid on 17-08-06 Rs.40,000/- 17-08-06 Rs.40

Showing 1–20 of 123 · Page 1 of 7

38
Section 200A31
Disallowance31

MSTC LTD,KOLKATA vs. JURISDICTIONAL ASSESSING OFFICER, CIR-1(1), KOLKATA. , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 623/KOL/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata01 Oct 2024AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishraassessment Year: 2021-22

For Appellant: Shri Prasun Bhattacharya, ARFor Respondent: Shri Manjeet Singh, CIT, DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 154Section 250

rectification u/s 154 before AO, both pendente lite and without going into the issue of the addition of contingent liability when AO had the full opportunity to do so in the scrutiny proceedings. 18. For that without prejudice to any other ground taken hereinbefore and hereinafter, the Ld. CIT(A) erred both in law and in the facts and circumstances

SRI GOPINATH GHORAI,PURBA MEDINIPUR vs. ACIT, CIR-27, HALDIA, HALDIA

In the result the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1/KOL/2016[2005-2006]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 Apr 2016AY 2005-2006

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri P.M.Jagtap, Am & Sri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi, Jm ] I.T.A No. 01/Kol/2016 Assessment Year : 2005-06

For Appellant: G.Banerjee, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Rajat Kumar Kureel, JCIT,Sr.DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 154Section 194Section 194CSection 40

rectification was the order passed under section 143(3) or the order u/s 143(3) read with section 147 dated 24/12/2010 itself requires explanations. clarifications and clearly debatable issue which cannot be decided under section 154. On this count also the assessee's request for amendment of order under section 154 is not tenable. 1.3 Lastly the Assessing Officer made

YASHWANT KUMAR DAGA,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CIR-30, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 263/KOL/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Jan 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Manish Boradi.T.A No.263/Kol/2022 Assessment Year: 2016-17 Yashwant Kumar Daga……………....................................................……Appellant Salarpuria Jajodia & Co., 3Rd Floor, 7, Chittaranjan Avenue, Kolkata-700072. [Pan: Afypd7477F] Vs. Acit, Circle-30, Kolkata…..…....…...................……........……...…..…..Respondent Appearances By: Shri Siddharth Jhajharia & Sujoy Sen, Ar, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Subhrajyoti Bhattacharjee, Cit-Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : January 04, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : January 16, 2023 आदेश / Order संजय गग", "या"यक सद"य "वारा / Per Sanjay Garg: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 06.12.2021 Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre [Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’). 2. The Assessee, In This Appeal, Has Taken The Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1. For That In View Of Facts & Circumstances That Ld. Cit (A) Has Erred In Not Quashing / Cancelling The Order / Part Of Order U/S 154 By Ao For Which Ao Even Did Not Issue Any Notice To Appellant & Hence Such Action Of Cit(A) Is Bad In Law & It May Be Held Accordingly.

Section 143(3)Section 154Section 250

TDS). The assessee, therefore, filed a rectification petition before the Assessing Officer u/s 154 of the Act. The Assessing Officer

SUNIL AGARWAL,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE - 50, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 1397/KOL/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata30 Nov 2016AY 2010-11

Bench: Shris.S.Viswanethra Ravi, Hon’Ble & Dr.A.L. Saini, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: ShriA.K.Tibrewal–FCAFor Respondent: ShriSnehanshu Biswas-JCIT-SR DR
Section 131Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 154Section 68

154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) dated 28.10.2014 &05.05.2016, which in turn arise out of the orders passed by the Assessing Officer u/s 143(3) of the Act, both dated 26.03.2013 respectively. Sunil Agarwal A.Y. 10-11 2. This caption appeals filed by the assessee pertains to same Assessment Year, same assessee, common issue

ITO, WD-41(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S IMAGE SIGN, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of revenue is dismissed

ITA 650/KOL/2014[2006-2007]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata03 Feb 2017AY 2006-2007

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan, Jm & Shri M. Balaganesh, Am]

For Appellant: Md. Ghayas Uddin, JCITFor Respondent: Shri D. K. Bandyopadhyay, FCA
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 194CSection 40

154 of the Act in the facts and circumstances of the case. 3. Brief facts of this issue is that the assessee is a partnership firm filed its return of income for AY 2006-07 and assessment was completed u/s. 143(3) of the Act on 24.12.2008 determining the total income at Rs.2,57,100/-. The AO subsequent

MANAB SEVA SANSTHAN ,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WD-1(4), EXEMPT, KOLKATA. , KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 593/KOL/2023[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Aug 2023AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2021-22 Manav Seva Sansthan Income-Tax Officer, Ward- Unit No. 1501, 15Th Floor, 1(4), Exempt, Kolkata. Diamond Heritage Building, Vs. 16, Strand Road, Kolkata- 700001. (Pan: Aabtm7707M) (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Surana, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri B.K. Singh, JCIT (Sr.DR)
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 154

TDS credit on 29.11.2022 & 01.02.2023 and rectification order u/s 154 was passed on 24.01.2023 and 16.02.2023 wherein TDS credit was again

DCIT, KOLKATA vs. L & T FINANCE LTD, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 377/KOL/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata22 Aug 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice- & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 14ASection 249(3)Section 250

u/s 154, the Ld. ADIT has granted TDS credit of only Rs. 1,62,96,67,274/-. 1.1.It is submitted that pursuant to the approval of the scheme of arrangement and amalgamation (‘Scheme’) by the Hon’ble High Court of Calcutta vide order dated 28-11-2016 and National Company Law Tribunal (‘NCLT') of Mumbai vide order dated

L & T FINANCE LIMITED (SUCCESSOR OF L & T INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED, NOW MERGED),KOLKATA vs. CIT(A),NFAC,ITD, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 645/KOL/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata22 Aug 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice- & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 14ASection 249(3)Section 250

u/s 154, the Ld. ADIT has granted TDS credit of only Rs. 1,62,96,67,274/-. 1.1.It is submitted that pursuant to the approval of the scheme of arrangement and amalgamation (‘Scheme’) by the Hon’ble High Court of Calcutta vide order dated 28-11-2016 and National Company Law Tribunal (‘NCLT') of Mumbai vide order dated

KND ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGIES LTD.,KOLKATA vs. PCIT, 4, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 135/KOL/2016[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata03 Aug 2016AY 2011-2012

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am ] Assessment Year : 2011-12

For Appellant: Shri Akkal Dudhwewala, ACAFor Respondent: Shri Hari Shankar Lal, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 154Section 194Section 194CSection 263Section 40

rectification order passed by the AO u/s 154 of the Act was challenged by the assessee by filing an appeal against the said order. He was of the view that the issues dealt with by the AO in the order u/s 154 of the Act cannot said to be mistake apparent from the record and therefore the interest

TRINAYANI REALTORS PVT. LTD,KOLKATA vs. AO, CPC, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 399/KOL/2021[2018-19]Status: HeardITAT Kolkata02 Mar 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rajesh Kumari.T.A. No.399/Kol/2021 Assessment Year: 2018-19 Trinayani Realtors Pvt. Ltd.........................………….………………….……Appellant C/O M/S Salarpuria Jajodia & Co., 7, C.R. Avenue, 3Rd Floor, Kolkata – 700072. [Pan: Aacct4238N] Vs. A.O., Cpc.................................…….…..…...............……........……...…..…..Respondent Appearances By: Shri Siddharth Jhajharia & Sujoy Sen, Ar, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Smt. Ranu Biswas, Addl. Cit-Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : February 23, 2022 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : March 02, 2022 Hearing Through Video Conferencing Order Per Sanjay Garg: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 27.09.2021 Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’). The Assessee In This Appeal Has Taken The Following Grounds Of Appeal:

Section 143(1)Section 154Section 199Section 250

TDS of Rs.39,72,950/- only. The assessee filed rectification application u/s 154. The rectification application u/s 154 was rejected

GTFS MULTI SERVICES LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR-6, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1385/KOL/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata08 Dec 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Hon’Ble Sri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Dr.Arjun Lal Saini, Am] I.T.A No.1385/Kol/2016 Assessment Year : 2007-08

For Appellant: Shri Somnath Ghosh, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Arindam Bhattacharjee, Addl.CIT
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 194ASection 264Section 40

u/s 154 of the Act, 1961.Therefore your rectification petition filed on 13.03.2013 is being rejected.” 5. Aggrieved by the aforesaid order the assessee preferred appeal before CIT(A). The CIT(A) firstly held that the mistake in question cannot said to be apparent on the face of the record. Secondly, the CIT(A) held that the assessee has not made

AVISHI PROJECTS LLP ,KOLKATA vs. ADIT, CPC, BANGALORE. , BANGALORE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1249/KOL/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 Jan 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Shri S. Jhajharia, A/RFor Respondent: Shri Vineet Kumar, Addl. CIT, D/R
Section 143(1)Section 154Section 250Section 5

TDS) and tax collected at source (TCS), was not allowed in the return processed u/s 143(1)(a) of the Act against which the assessee has filed the instant appeal. The assessee had also filed application u/s 154 of the Act which was also disposed against the assessee. However, the appeal against the order u/s

I.T.O., WARD-12(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S SEARCH ENGINE RANKING SYSTEM CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2111/KOL/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Feb 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: "ी जे. सुधाकर रे"डी, लेखा सद"य एवं/And "ी ऐ. ट". वक", "यायीक सद"य) [Before Shri J. Sudhakar Reddy, Am & Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

Section 10BSection 143(1)Section 154

TDS) to re-examine the rectification petition of the assessee which according to revenue, the Ld. CIT(A) does not have the power to do so. 3. Brief facts of the case are that according to revenue the Ld. CIT(A) has only power to confirm, reduce, enhance or annul the assessment but he cannot set aside the matter

MANJU CHOUDHARY,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T.,CIRCLE-38, KOLKATA

In the result, we cancel this order and allow the appeal of the assessee

ITA 893/KOL/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata04 Dec 2020AY 2007-08

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Sri S.S. Godara)

Section 143(3)Section 154Section 194ASection 197Section 250Section 40

TDS from the payment of interest to loan creditors and hence she is liable for disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act. As this disallowance was not done in the assessment order passed u/s 143(3) of the Act on 29.12.2009, the same requires rectification u/s 154

BENGAL GHG DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 5(1), KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2495/KOL/2024[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata25 Jul 2025AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubeyi.T.A. No. 2495 & 2496/Kol/2024 Assessment Years: 2020-2021 & 2021-2022 Bengal Ghg Developers Pvt. Limited,………Appellant 80, Bentinck Street, Lal Bazar, Kolkata-700001, West Bengal [Pan:Aadcb1649Q] -Vs.- Income Tax Officer,……………….……….....Respondent Ward-5(1), Kolkata, Aayakar Bhawan, P-7, Chowringhee Square, Kolkata-700069 Appearances By: Shri A.K. Keshari, A.R., Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri Kapil Mondal, Addl. Cit, Sr. D.R., Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing: July 22, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order: July 25, 2025 O R D E R

Section 154

TDs claim of the appellant of Rs.24,58,869/- to Rs.21,19,577/- only. The appellant sought rectification of the same u/s 154

BENGAL GHG DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 5(1), KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2496/KOL/2024[2021-2022]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata25 Jul 2025AY 2021-2022

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubeyi.T.A. No. 2495 & 2496/Kol/2024 Assessment Years: 2020-2021 & 2021-2022 Bengal Ghg Developers Pvt. Limited,………Appellant 80, Bentinck Street, Lal Bazar, Kolkata-700001, West Bengal [Pan:Aadcb1649Q] -Vs.- Income Tax Officer,……………….……….....Respondent Ward-5(1), Kolkata, Aayakar Bhawan, P-7, Chowringhee Square, Kolkata-700069 Appearances By: Shri A.K. Keshari, A.R., Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri Kapil Mondal, Addl. Cit, Sr. D.R., Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing: July 22, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order: July 25, 2025 O R D E R

Section 154

TDs claim of the appellant of Rs.24,58,869/- to Rs.21,19,577/- only. The appellant sought rectification of the same u/s 154

AMAR NATH SHROFF,KOLKATA vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA

In the result ITA Nos.1797 to 1800/Kol/2009 are allowed while ITA Nos

ITA 1797/KOL/2009[2001-02]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Mar 2016AY 2001-02

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Am ]

For Respondent: Shri Anil Kumar Pande, JCIT, Sr.DR
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274

TDS of Rs.l,63,242/-, self assessment tax u/s.140A of Rs.5,27,991/- and regular tax of Rs. 2,01,275/-paid on 22-07-2008. The appellant is still due to pay tax and interest of Rs.53,445/- . For Assessment Year 2005-06, the appellant on a total income of Rs. 84,75,7201- was liable

DCIT, C.C. I, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. AMARNATH SHROFF, KOLKATA

In the result ITA Nos.1797 to 1800/Kol/2009 are allowed while ITA Nos

ITA 1494/KOL/2010[2001-02]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Mar 2016AY 2001-02

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Am ]

For Respondent: Shri Anil Kumar Pande, JCIT, Sr.DR
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274

TDS of Rs.l,63,242/-, self assessment tax u/s.140A of Rs.5,27,991/- and regular tax of Rs. 2,01,275/-paid on 22-07-2008. The appellant is still due to pay tax and interest of Rs.53,445/- . For Assessment Year 2005-06, the appellant on a total income of Rs. 84,75,7201- was liable

I.T.O WD - 6(2),KOLKATA., KOLKATA vs. M/S AXIX OVERSEAS LTD, KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal is partly allowed

ITA 532/KOL/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 Oct 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri N.V.Vasudevan & Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 143(3)Section 194A

rectification application u/s. 154 of the Act wherein Ld. CIT(A) has accepted the fact that assessee has never agreed for the disallowance of interest for ₹1,35,88,895/-. The relevant extract of the order of Ld. CIT(A) passed order u/s 154 of the Act is reproduced as below:- “4. The rate of 13.5% has been used