BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

146 results for “TDS”+ Permanent Establishmentclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,021Mumbai794Chennai353Bangalore282Kolkata146Karnataka120Ahmedabad98Jaipur45Chandigarh31Raipur30Hyderabad26Indore26Visakhapatnam19Dehradun19Rajkot17Lucknow13Pune12Nagpur8Cochin8Guwahati7Cuttack7Panaji6Amritsar6SC5Telangana5Jodhpur5Agra4Varanasi4Jabalpur3Surat3Uttarakhand2Patna1Kerala1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)86Section 14A50Disallowance50Addition to Income50Deduction47Section 4045Section 19537TDS36Double Taxation/DTAA34Section 244A

M/S BALMER LAWRIES & CO. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER(IT) WD-1(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, assessee’s appeal stands allowed

ITA 2079/KOL/2014[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata27 Apr 2016AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year :2012-13 M/S Balmer Lawrie & Co. V/S. Income Tax Officer Ltd., 21, N.S.Road, (International Taxation), Kolkata-700 001 Ward-1(1), Aayakar [Pan No. Aabcb 0984 E] Bhawan (Poorva), 2Nd Floor, R. No.215, 110, Shanti Pally, Kolkata- 700 107 .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Shri M.K.Poddar, Sr-Advocate अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/By Appellant Shri C.P.Bhatia, Jcit-Dr ""यथ" क" ओर से/By Respondent 18-02-2016 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing 27-04-2016 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement

Section 195Section 201(1)Section 5(2)(b)

TDS on such payment. 2. None of overseas agent has any permanent establishment in India. Therefore the question of TDS

HITT vs. DCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIR.-1(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

Showing 1–20 of 146 · Page 1 of 8

...
31
Section 6824
Permanent Establishment23
ITA 348/KOL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Jul 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri S S Godara, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am ]

For Appellant: Shri Sourav Agarwal, ARFor Respondent: Shri G. Mallikarjuna, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)

permanent establishment is situated. The profits related to that part of the contract which is carried out by the head office of the enterprise shall be taxable only in the State of which the enterprise is a resident. (underlining provided by us) 2. ……… 3……….. We hold that even as per the Protocol clause in the Indo-Netherlands Treaty, only

HITT HOLLAND INSTITUTE OF TRAFFIC TECHNOLOGY B.V vs. DCIT, (IT)-1(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 290/KOL/2016[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Jul 2018AY 2012-2013

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri S S Godara, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am ]

For Appellant: Shri Sourav Agarwal, ARFor Respondent: Shri G. Mallikarjuna, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)

permanent establishment is situated. The profits related to that part of the contract which is carried out by the head office of the enterprise shall be taxable only in the State of which the enterprise is a resident. (underlining provided by us) 2. ……… 3……….. We hold that even as per the Protocol clause in the Indo-Netherlands Treaty, only

GIFFORD & PARTNERS LTD.(SINCE MERGED WITH GIFFORD LLP),KOLKATA vs. ADIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) - 1(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result ITA No.1489/Kol/11 is partly allowed

ITA 1489/KOL/2011[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata06 Apr 2016AY 2005-06

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Am] Assessment Year : 2007-08

For Appellant: Shri S.K.Agarwal, FCAFor Respondent: Shri G.Mallikarjuna, CIT (DR)
Section 143(3)Section 144C

TDS. As we have already seen the payments to be made by GRSE are net of taxes on income if any payable in India. In other words such taxes have to be borne by GRSE. Sec.195A of the provides that in a case, where under an agreement or other arrangement, the tax chargeable on any income referred to in Chapter

GIFFORD & PARTNERS LTD.(SINCE MERGED WITH GIFFORD LLP),KOLKATA vs. DDIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION - 1(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result ITA No.1489/Kol/11 is partly allowed

ITA 2082/KOL/2010[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata06 Apr 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Am] Assessment Year : 2007-08

For Appellant: Shri S.K.Agarwal, FCAFor Respondent: Shri G.Mallikarjuna, CIT (DR)
Section 143(3)Section 144C

TDS. As we have already seen the payments to be made by GRSE are net of taxes on income if any payable in India. In other words such taxes have to be borne by GRSE. Sec.195A of the provides that in a case, where under an agreement or other arrangement, the tax chargeable on any income referred to in Chapter

ITO (IT), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. ELECTROSTEEL CASTING LIMITED., KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 2249/KOL/2014[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata07 Jul 2017AY 2011-2012

Bench: Hon’Ble Sri A.T.Varkey, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am ] I.T.A No. 2249/Kol/2014 Assessment Year : 2011-12 I.T.O. (International Taxation), -Vs.- M/S. Electrosteel Casting Ltd. Kolkata Kolkata [Pan : Aaace 4975 B] (Respondent) (Appellant) For The Appellant : None For The Respondent : Shri Ravi Tulsiyan, Fca Date Of Hearing : 14.06.2017. Date Of Pronouncement : 07.07.2017 Order

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Ravi Tulsiyan, FCA
Section 143(3)Section 195Section 201Section 5(2)Section 9(1)(i)

Permanent Establishment in India? 2 The Ld CIT (A) erred in relying upon the CBDT circular no. 163 dated 29/05/75 & circular no 786 date 07/02/2000, without noticing that these circulars have been superceded by CBDT circular no. 07/2009 date 22/10/2009.” 3. Any other ground to be taken at the time of hearing. 9. None appeared on behalf of the revenue

METSO OUTOTEC OYJ (EARLIER KNOWN AS OUTOTEC OYJ),GURUGRAM vs. DCIT, (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) CIR. 1(2), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 300/KOL/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 Aug 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice- & Shri Rajesh Kumar

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)

permanent establishment in India. He drew our attention towards the order of ITAT in the case of M/s. Capgemini S.A. –vs.- ADIT (Mumbai ITAT) in ITA No. 7198/Mum/2012. On the strength of all these details, he contended that Corporate Guarantee 18 Assessment Year: 2018-2019 & Assessment Year: 2020-2021 Metso Outotec OYJ (Earlier known as ‘Outotec OYJ”) was not received

METSO OUTOTEC OYJ (EARLIER KNOWN AS OUTOTEC OYJ),GURUGRAM vs. ACIT, (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) CIR. 1(2), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 269/KOL/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 Aug 2023AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice- & Shri Rajesh Kumar

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)

permanent establishment in India. He drew our attention towards the order of ITAT in the case of M/s. Capgemini S.A. –vs.- ADIT (Mumbai ITAT) in ITA No. 7198/Mum/2012. On the strength of all these details, he contended that Corporate Guarantee 18 Assessment Year: 2018-2019 & Assessment Year: 2020-2021 Metso Outotec OYJ (Earlier known as ‘Outotec OYJ”) was not received

HITT HOLLAND INSTITUTE OF TRAFFIC TECHNOLOGY B. V. vs. DDIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION 1(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is partly allowed

ITA 574/KOL/2014[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata08 Feb 2017AY 2010-2011

Bench: Hon’Ble Sri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Dr.Arjun Lal Saini, Am] I.T.A No. 574/Kol/2014 Assessment Year : 2010-11 Hitt Holland Institute Of Traffic -Vs.- D.D.I.T. (Intl.T)-1, Technology B.V., Kolkata Kolkata. [Pan : Aabch 5694 R] (Respondent) (Appellant) For The Appellant : Shri S.K.Agarwal, Ar For The Respondent : Shri.G.Mallikarjuna, Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing : 02.02.2017. Date Of Pronouncement : 08.02.2017. Order Per N.V.Vasudevan, Jm

For Appellant: Shri S.K.Agarwal, ARFor Respondent: Shri.G.Mallikarjuna, CIT(DR)
Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)

Permanent Establishment' means: 32 HIIT Holland Institute of Traffic Technology B.V. A.Yr..2010-11 "a fixed place of business through which the business of the enterprise is wholly or partly carried on. It was argued that on a plain reading of the opening paragraph of Article 5, the 'enterprise- referred to in Article 5(1) of the India Netherlands DTAA

I.T.O WD - 12(3),KOLKATA., KOLKATA vs. M/S JAI VIKSHU NIKETAN PVT LTD, KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal stands dismissed

ITA 1133/KOL/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata23 Sept 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Raviassessment Years:2009-10

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

establishment in India are eligible for payment without TDS as per the provisions of the Act. 2. The parties to whom the payment of commission paid /to be paid are genuine. From the above facts, we find that the question of TDS from the payment of commission arises in the aforesaid facts & circumstances when the payee has some permanent

EIH LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 8, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 314/KOL/2011[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata01 Jun 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Shri M. Balaganesh, Am]

For Respondent: Shri Vijay Shankar, CIT, DR
Section 143(3)Section 195Section 40Section 9(1)(vii)

TDS in view of inter unit payments. In respect of the other payments the assessee submitted that no tax was required to be deducted at source as the party rendered services from abroad and did not have any permanent establishment

DCIT, CIRCLE - 8, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. EIH LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 348/KOL/2011[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata01 Jun 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Shri M. Balaganesh, Am]

For Respondent: Shri Vijay Shankar, CIT, DR
Section 143(3)Section 195Section 40Section 9(1)(vii)

TDS in view of inter unit payments. In respect of the other payments the assessee submitted that no tax was required to be deducted at source as the party rendered services from abroad and did not have any permanent establishment

ITO, WD-7(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S M.S.K. TRAVELS AND TOURS LTD., KOLKATA

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 284/KOL/2015[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata22 Jun 2018AY 2008-2009

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri S.S.Godara, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am ]

For Appellant: Shri N.B.Som, Addl. CIT, Sr.DRFor Respondent: Shri Bikash Chanda, AR
Section 143(3)Section 195Section 40Section 5(2)Section 9Section 9(1)(i)Section 9(2)Section 90(1)

permanent establishment in India since it is taxable u/s 9 (2)(vii) Explanation 2 as well as Article 12 of India Sweden Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement. All these substantive grounds are vehemently reiterated during the course of hearing. Learned Addl. CIT (DR) reminds us time and again that the relevant benefits of India Portugal Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement

ABN AMRO BANK N.V.,KOLKATA vs. DDIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION - 1(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 1738/KOL/2009[2005-2006]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 Apr 2016AY 2005-2006

Bench: : Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: Shri R.N. Bajroria, Sr. Adocate, ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri G. Mallikarjana, CIT, ld.DR
Section 143(3)Section 44C

permanent establishment. In the calculation of such profit by a banking enterprise interest paid can be taken as a deduction by virtue of article 7(3) read with article 11 (7). The assessee was a Netherlands company· and its principal branch office was in India. In the course of its banking activities, the branch office in India remitted substantial funds

ERSHISANYE CONSTRUCTION GROUP INDIA PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR-11(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal by the Assessee is allowed

ITA 756/KOL/2015[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata12 Apr 2017AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Dr. A.L.Saini, Am

For Appellant: Shri Pritam Chowdhury, CAFor Respondent: Shri G.Mallikarjuna, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)

TDS obligation because Hunan, admittedly does not have Permanent Establishment (PE) in India and as per Article 7(1) of India

OUTOTEC (FINLAND) OY (NOW MERGED WITH "METSO MINERALS OY" AND THE MERGED ENTITY HAS BEEN RENAMED TO METSO OUTOTEC FINLAND OY),HARYANA vs. ACIT(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), CIRCLE-2(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result,both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 351/KOL/2022[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 Feb 2023AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri K. M. Gupta, ARFor Respondent: Shri G. HukughaSema, CIT, DR
Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 144C(5)Section 270ASection 271A

Permanent Establishment of the assessee in India which is not so under the present set of facts. Further, it is submitted that work relating to designs and drawings was undertaken outside India, sale has also taken place outside India and consideration was also received outside India in foreign currency. 11.1. We have gone through the decision of the Coordinate Bench

OUTOTEC(FINLAND) OY (NOW MERGED WITH "METSO MINERALS OY" AND THE MERGED ENTITY HAS BEEN RENAMED TO METSO OUTOTEC FINLAND OY),GURUGRAM vs. DCIT(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), CIRCLE-2(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result,both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 350/KOL/2022[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 Feb 2023AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri K. M. Gupta, ARFor Respondent: Shri G. HukughaSema, CIT, DR
Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 144C(5)Section 270ASection 271A

Permanent Establishment of the assessee in India which is not so under the present set of facts. Further, it is submitted that work relating to designs and drawings was undertaken outside India, sale has also taken place outside India and consideration was also received outside India in foreign currency. 11.1. We have gone through the decision of the Coordinate Bench

DONGFANG ELECTRIC CORPORATION,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION 1(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 487/KOL/2015[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata25 Oct 2017AY 2010-2011

Bench: Sri N.V. Vasudevan & Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy]

Section 143(3)

Permanent Establishment (PE) in India in the context of taxation under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1961 and the India-China Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement [hereafter referred to as ‘DTAA’] 2. In the year 2004, the assessee entered into two separate contracts; one with the 'The West Bengal Power Development Corporation Limited (WBPDCL), for setting up Units

DONGFANG ELECTRIC CORPORATION,KOLKATA vs. DDIT (IT)-1(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 572/KOL/2014[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata25 Oct 2017AY 2009-2010

Bench: Sri N.V. Vasudevan & Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy]

Section 143(3)

Permanent Establishment (PE) in India in the context of taxation under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1961 and the India-China Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement [hereafter referred to as ‘DTAA’] 2. In the year 2004, the assessee entered into two separate contracts; one with the 'The West Bengal Power Development Corporation Limited (WBPDCL), for setting up Units

ITO (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), WARD- KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. HARTAJ SEWA SINGH, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1693/KOL/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata30 Jan 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Sri Sanjay Garg & Sri Rakesh Mishra

Section 154Section 195Section 201(1)Section 250Section 9(1)(vi)Section 9(1)(vii)

permanent establishment of SCPL in India. As an alternative argument and in addition to the above, he also held that the payment of Rs. 80,90,694/- was royalty on which TDS