BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

264 results for “TDS”+ Block Assessmentclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi989Mumbai916Bangalore625Chennai387Kolkata264Karnataka184Hyderabad147Patna134Ahmedabad89Chandigarh85Jaipur59Raipur47Pune36Surat32Nagpur29Lucknow25Dehradun22Visakhapatnam21Cuttack21Indore18Rajkot17Guwahati17Agra16Jodhpur10Telangana10Allahabad7Ranchi4Cochin2Panaji2J&K2Jabalpur1Rajasthan1Calcutta1Amritsar1Gauhati1Kerala1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)60Section 4046TDS45Addition to Income44Disallowance43Deduction33Section 201(1)22Section 26322Section 25021Section 14A

DCIT, KOLKATA vs. RAVI KUMAR NEWATIA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 339/KOL/2025[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 Oct 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubeyassessment Year: 2011-12 Dcit, Kolkata ……………………………………….…………….…….……Appellant Vs. Ravi Kumar Newatia…..…………………………...………...……...…..…..Respondent 29/13, Doveland Court Ballygunge Park, Kol- 19. [Pan: Abqpn6532P] Appearances By: Shri S. B. Chakraborthy, Sr. Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Miraj D. Shah, Ar, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : October 08, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : October 28, 2025 Order Per Pradip Kumar Choubey: This Appeal Filed By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Dated 14.08.24 Of The Cit(A)-21, Kolkata [‘Cit(A)’] Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As “The Act”) For The Assessment Year 2011–12. The Appeal Has Been Filed By The Revenue With A Delay Of 76 Days. 2. The Revenue Has Filed A Petition For Condonation Of The Delay. After Considering The Reasons Cited In The Petition For Condonation Of Delay, We Find That The Reasons Are Valid & Consequently, The Delay In Filing The Appeal Is Hereby Condoned & We Proceed To Dispose Of The Appeal On Merits. Ravi Kumar Newatia

Section 147Section 148Section 153ASection 250

block assessment proceedings for the assessment year 2012-13 to 2017-18, the same facts were presented before the ACIT, Central Circle 3(4), Kolkata where the commission was disclosed to the tune of 10% of TDS

Showing 1–20 of 264 · Page 1 of 14

...
21
Section 115J19
Section 19516

A.C.I.T CIR - 1,HOOGHLY, HOOGHLY vs. M/S JAIRAM DISTRIBUTORS, HOOGHLY

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1255/KOL/2013[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 May 2016AY 2005-06

Bench: : Shri P.M. Jagtap & Shri S.S Viswanethra Ravi

For Appellant: Shri V.N Dutta, Advocate, ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri S.M.Das, JCIT, ld.DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 40

block assessment case and not similar to the present case. 5. The appellant craves leave to add, alter or abrogate any ground. 3. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a partnership firm engaged in the business of distribution of medicines. Originally the assessment was completed

DCIT, (IT), 2(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S THE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND N.V., KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 496/KOL/2015[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata14 Oct 2016AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan, Jm & Shri M. Balaganesh, Am]

For Appellant: Shri R.N.Bajoria Sr. Advocate &For Respondent: Shri G. Mallikarjuna, CIT, DR
Section 143(3)Section 43D

block continues to exist as on 31.3.2010. In these circumstances, we find lot of force in the arguments of the ld AR and accordingly allow the Ground No. 2 raised by the assessee. 8 ITA No. 496-477/Kol/2015 The Royal Bank of Scotland NV, AY 2010-11 4. The next issue is with regard to the applicability of provisions

L & T FINANCE LIMITED (SUCCESSOR OF L & T INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED, NOW MERGED),KOLKATA vs. CIT(A),NFAC,ITD, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 645/KOL/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata22 Aug 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice- & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 14ASection 249(3)Section 250

TDS credit because the income has been assessed to tax in the hands of the successor Company. The ld. CIT(Appeals) has not committed any 19 Assessment Year: 2013-2014 & Assessment Year : 2019-2020 L & T Finance Limited error and accordingly this ground of appeal is also rejected. 21. In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

DCIT, KOLKATA vs. L & T FINANCE LTD, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 377/KOL/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata22 Aug 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice- & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 14ASection 249(3)Section 250

TDS credit because the income has been assessed to tax in the hands of the successor Company. The ld. CIT(Appeals) has not committed any 19 Assessment Year: 2013-2014 & Assessment Year : 2019-2020 L & T Finance Limited error and accordingly this ground of appeal is also rejected. 21. In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

PRIMETALS TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE - 1(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, appeals of the assessee for Assessment Year 2017-18

ITA 372/KOL/2022[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 May 2024AY 2018-2019

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 371 & 372/Kol/2022 Assessment Year: 2017-18 & 2018-19 Primetals Technologies India Pvt. Ltd. Acit, Circle-1(1), Kolkata 5Th Floor, Tower-C Vs Dlf, It Park-I 08 Majore Arterial Road New Town Kolkata - 700156 [Pan : Aaecv9657M] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Ajoy Vora, Sr. Advocate & Pooja Saraf, Ar Revenue By : Shri Rakesh Kumar Das, Cit, D/R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 21/02/2024 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 16/05/2024 आदेश/O R D E R Per Dr. Manish Borad: The Present Appeals Are Directed At The Instance Of The Assessee Against The Final Assessment Orders Framed U/S 143(3) R.W.S. 144C & 144C(5) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter ‘The Act’) By The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle – 1(1), Kolkata (Hereinafter The “Ld. Ao”) Even Dt. 29/04/2022, Passed In Pursuance Of The Directions Of The Ld. Dispute Resolution Panel -2, New Delhi, Dt. 18/02/2022 For Assessment Year 2017-18 & Dt. 04/03/2022 For Assessment Year 2018-19, Passed U/S 144C(5) Of The Act. 2. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal For Assessment Year 2017-18:- “Ground 1:

For Appellant: Shri Ajoy Vora, Sr. Advocate and Pooja Saraf, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rakesh Kumar Das, CIT, D/R
Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(5)Section 156Section 32(1)Section 92C

block of assets and accordingly claimed depreciation thereon as per the provisions of law. As such, the claim of the assessee for the depreciation was accepted by the Revenue in the immediate preceding assessment year 2006-07. No action was taken by the Revenue under section 263 and 147 of the Act disputing the deduction allowed to the assessee

PRIMETALS TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, appeals of the assessee for Assessment Year 2017-18

ITA 371/KOL/2022[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 May 2024AY 2017-2018

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 371 & 372/Kol/2022 Assessment Year: 2017-18 & 2018-19 Primetals Technologies India Pvt. Ltd. Acit, Circle-1(1), Kolkata 5Th Floor, Tower-C Vs Dlf, It Park-I 08 Majore Arterial Road New Town Kolkata - 700156 [Pan : Aaecv9657M] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Ajoy Vora, Sr. Advocate & Pooja Saraf, Ar Revenue By : Shri Rakesh Kumar Das, Cit, D/R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 21/02/2024 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 16/05/2024 आदेश/O R D E R Per Dr. Manish Borad: The Present Appeals Are Directed At The Instance Of The Assessee Against The Final Assessment Orders Framed U/S 143(3) R.W.S. 144C & 144C(5) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter ‘The Act’) By The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle – 1(1), Kolkata (Hereinafter The “Ld. Ao”) Even Dt. 29/04/2022, Passed In Pursuance Of The Directions Of The Ld. Dispute Resolution Panel -2, New Delhi, Dt. 18/02/2022 For Assessment Year 2017-18 & Dt. 04/03/2022 For Assessment Year 2018-19, Passed U/S 144C(5) Of The Act. 2. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal For Assessment Year 2017-18:- “Ground 1:

For Appellant: Shri Ajoy Vora, Sr. Advocate and Pooja Saraf, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rakesh Kumar Das, CIT, D/R
Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(5)Section 156Section 32(1)Section 92C

block of assets and accordingly claimed depreciation thereon as per the provisions of law. As such, the claim of the assessee for the depreciation was accepted by the Revenue in the immediate preceding assessment year 2006-07. No action was taken by the Revenue under section 263 and 147 of the Act disputing the deduction allowed to the assessee

M/S VODAFONE EAST LTD.(FORMERLY KNOWN AS VODAFONE ESSAR EAST LIMITED),KOLKATA vs. A.D.I.T RANGE - 7,KOL., KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 1864/KOL/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Sept 2015AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri M. Balaganesh

Section 143(3)Section 194ISection 40

TDS provisions for international roaming charges of Rs.10,64,45,346/- is allowed. 10. Disallowance of Penalty paid to Department of Telecommunications- Rs.5,05,000/- The next issue to be decided in this appeal is as to whether the sum paid as penalty to Department of Telecommunications (DOT) by the assessee would fall under the Explanation to section

D.C.I.T CIR - 3,KOLATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S MANTORA OIL PRODUCTS LTD, KOLKATA

In the result, assessee’s appeal stands allowed

ITA 2252/KOL/2013[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata18 Mar 2016AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year :2010-11

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 263Section 40A(2)

TDS be held unsustainable since no show cause in that regard was issued and no specific error in the AO’s order in that regard was proved by the CIT. 11. For that on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the CIT’s order directing AO to re-examine the details of professional fees, conveyance expenses, establishment

ANJALI JEWELLERS PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. CIT, KOLKATA-IV, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, assessee’s appeal stands allowed

ITA 2252/KOL/2014[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata18 Mar 2016AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year :2010-11

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 263Section 40A(2)

TDS be held unsustainable since no show cause in that regard was issued and no specific error in the AO’s order in that regard was proved by the CIT. 11. For that on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the CIT’s order directing AO to re-examine the details of professional fees, conveyance expenses, establishment

SUNDIP KUMAR GUPTA. ,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR-47, KOLKATA. , KOLKATA

Appeals of the assessee stand allowed

ITA 1172/KOL/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Jul 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rakesh Mishrai.T.A. Nos.1170 To1173/Kol/2023 Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2012-13, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Sundip Kumar Gupta..…………………....................…...……………....Appellant Fort Oasis Complex, Flat No.040903, Block-436B, Panditya Road, Kolkata – 700029. [Pan: Aebpg7187B] Vs. Dcit, Circle-47, Kolkata…….……………............................…..…..... Respondent Appearances By: Shri Abhishek Bansal, Ar, Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee. Shri B. K. Singh, Jcit-Sr. Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : April 23, 2024 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : July 02, 2024 आदेश / Order संजय गग", "या"यक सद"य "वारा / Per Sanjay Garg: The Captioned Are Bunch Of Four Appeals Preferred By The Assessee Against The Separate Orders Dated 06.09.2023, 06.09.2023, 15.09.2023 & 06.09.2023, Respectively, Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’). Since The Facts & Issues Involved In All The Appeals Are Identical, Hence, These Appeals Have Been Heard Together & Are Being Disposed Of By This Common Order. At The Request Of Ld. Representatives Of The Parties, Ita No.1170/Kol/2023 Is Taken As The Lead Case For The Purpose Of Narration Of Facts.

Section 147Section 250Section 68

Block-436B, Panditya Road, Kolkata – 700029. [PAN: AEBPG7187B] vs. DCIT, Circle-47, Kolkata…….……………............................…..…..... Respondent Appearances by: Shri Abhishek Bansal, AR, appeared on behalf of the assessee. Shri B. K. Singh, JCIT-Sr. DR, appeared on behalf of the Revenue. Date of concluding the hearing : April 23, 2024 Date of pronouncing the order : July 02, 2024 आदेश / ORDER संजय गग", "या

SUNDIP KUMAR GUPTA. ,KOLKATA vs. DCIT,CIR-47, KOLKATA. , KOLKATA

Appeals of the assessee stand allowed

ITA 1171/KOL/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Jul 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rakesh Mishrai.T.A. Nos.1170 To1173/Kol/2023 Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2012-13, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Sundip Kumar Gupta..…………………....................…...……………....Appellant Fort Oasis Complex, Flat No.040903, Block-436B, Panditya Road, Kolkata – 700029. [Pan: Aebpg7187B] Vs. Dcit, Circle-47, Kolkata…….……………............................…..…..... Respondent Appearances By: Shri Abhishek Bansal, Ar, Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee. Shri B. K. Singh, Jcit-Sr. Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : April 23, 2024 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : July 02, 2024 आदेश / Order संजय गग", "या"यक सद"य "वारा / Per Sanjay Garg: The Captioned Are Bunch Of Four Appeals Preferred By The Assessee Against The Separate Orders Dated 06.09.2023, 06.09.2023, 15.09.2023 & 06.09.2023, Respectively, Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’). Since The Facts & Issues Involved In All The Appeals Are Identical, Hence, These Appeals Have Been Heard Together & Are Being Disposed Of By This Common Order. At The Request Of Ld. Representatives Of The Parties, Ita No.1170/Kol/2023 Is Taken As The Lead Case For The Purpose Of Narration Of Facts.

Section 147Section 250Section 68

Block-436B, Panditya Road, Kolkata – 700029. [PAN: AEBPG7187B] vs. DCIT, Circle-47, Kolkata…….……………............................…..…..... Respondent Appearances by: Shri Abhishek Bansal, AR, appeared on behalf of the assessee. Shri B. K. Singh, JCIT-Sr. DR, appeared on behalf of the Revenue. Date of concluding the hearing : April 23, 2024 Date of pronouncing the order : July 02, 2024 आदेश / ORDER संजय गग", "या

SUNDIP KUMAR GUPTA. ,KOLKATA vs. DCIT,CIR-47, KOLKATA. , KOLKATA

Appeals of the assessee stand allowed

ITA 1170/KOL/2023[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Jul 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rakesh Mishrai.T.A. Nos.1170 To1173/Kol/2023 Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2012-13, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Sundip Kumar Gupta..…………………....................…...……………....Appellant Fort Oasis Complex, Flat No.040903, Block-436B, Panditya Road, Kolkata – 700029. [Pan: Aebpg7187B] Vs. Dcit, Circle-47, Kolkata…….……………............................…..…..... Respondent Appearances By: Shri Abhishek Bansal, Ar, Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee. Shri B. K. Singh, Jcit-Sr. Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : April 23, 2024 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : July 02, 2024 आदेश / Order संजय गग", "या"यक सद"य "वारा / Per Sanjay Garg: The Captioned Are Bunch Of Four Appeals Preferred By The Assessee Against The Separate Orders Dated 06.09.2023, 06.09.2023, 15.09.2023 & 06.09.2023, Respectively, Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’). Since The Facts & Issues Involved In All The Appeals Are Identical, Hence, These Appeals Have Been Heard Together & Are Being Disposed Of By This Common Order. At The Request Of Ld. Representatives Of The Parties, Ita No.1170/Kol/2023 Is Taken As The Lead Case For The Purpose Of Narration Of Facts.

Section 147Section 250Section 68

Block-436B, Panditya Road, Kolkata – 700029. [PAN: AEBPG7187B] vs. DCIT, Circle-47, Kolkata…….……………............................…..…..... Respondent Appearances by: Shri Abhishek Bansal, AR, appeared on behalf of the assessee. Shri B. K. Singh, JCIT-Sr. DR, appeared on behalf of the Revenue. Date of concluding the hearing : April 23, 2024 Date of pronouncing the order : July 02, 2024 आदेश / ORDER संजय गग", "या

SUNDIP KUMAR GUPTA. ,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR-47,KOLKATA. , KOLKATA

Appeals of the assessee stand allowed

ITA 1173/KOL/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Jul 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rakesh Mishrai.T.A. Nos.1170 To1173/Kol/2023 Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2012-13, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Sundip Kumar Gupta..…………………....................…...……………....Appellant Fort Oasis Complex, Flat No.040903, Block-436B, Panditya Road, Kolkata – 700029. [Pan: Aebpg7187B] Vs. Dcit, Circle-47, Kolkata…….……………............................…..…..... Respondent Appearances By: Shri Abhishek Bansal, Ar, Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee. Shri B. K. Singh, Jcit-Sr. Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : April 23, 2024 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : July 02, 2024 आदेश / Order संजय गग", "या"यक सद"य "वारा / Per Sanjay Garg: The Captioned Are Bunch Of Four Appeals Preferred By The Assessee Against The Separate Orders Dated 06.09.2023, 06.09.2023, 15.09.2023 & 06.09.2023, Respectively, Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’). Since The Facts & Issues Involved In All The Appeals Are Identical, Hence, These Appeals Have Been Heard Together & Are Being Disposed Of By This Common Order. At The Request Of Ld. Representatives Of The Parties, Ita No.1170/Kol/2023 Is Taken As The Lead Case For The Purpose Of Narration Of Facts.

Section 147Section 250Section 68

Block-436B, Panditya Road, Kolkata – 700029. [PAN: AEBPG7187B] vs. DCIT, Circle-47, Kolkata…….……………............................…..…..... Respondent Appearances by: Shri Abhishek Bansal, AR, appeared on behalf of the assessee. Shri B. K. Singh, JCIT-Sr. DR, appeared on behalf of the Revenue. Date of concluding the hearing : April 23, 2024 Date of pronouncing the order : July 02, 2024 आदेश / ORDER संजय गग", "या

DCIT, CIRCLE - 8(2), KOLKATA , KOLKATA vs. M/S. SPML INFRA LIMITED , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 1211/KOL/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata17 Jan 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.1228/Kol/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year:2011-12)

For Appellant: Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate & Ms. Lata Goyal, ACAFor Respondent: Shri Radhey Shyam, CIT
Section 263

Block-A, 3rd Floor, Kolkata-700016 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No.: AADCS 2469 K (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate & Ms. Lata Goyal, ACA Respondent by : Shri Radhey Shyam, CIT सुनवाईक"तार"ख/ Date of Hearing : 18/12/2019 घोषणाक"तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement : 17/01/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per A.L. Saini, AM: The captioned cross appeals filed

M/S. SPML INFRA LIMITED ,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 8(2), KOLKATA , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 1228/KOL/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata17 Jan 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.1228/Kol/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year:2011-12)

For Appellant: Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate & Ms. Lata Goyal, ACAFor Respondent: Shri Radhey Shyam, CIT
Section 263

Block-A, 3rd Floor, Kolkata-700016 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No.: AADCS 2469 K (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate & Ms. Lata Goyal, ACA Respondent by : Shri Radhey Shyam, CIT सुनवाईक"तार"ख/ Date of Hearing : 18/12/2019 घोषणाक"तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement : 17/01/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per A.L. Saini, AM: The captioned cross appeals filed

DCIT, CIRCLE - 12(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. INTERNATIONAL SEAPORTS (HALDIA) PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 997/KOL/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata14 Dec 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble Vice- & Shri Girish Agrawal, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 997/Kol/2018 Assessment Year: 2012-13 Deputy Commissioner Of Income International Seaports (Haldia) Tax, Circle-12(1), Kolkata Vs Pvt. Ltd. 41, Jawahar Lal Nehru Road Kanak Building 3Rd Floor Kolkata - 700071 [Pan : Aaaci9468D] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "त् यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Somnath Ghosh, Advocate Revenue By : Shri Sudipto Ghosh, Cit D/R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 19/10/2022 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 14/12/2022 आदेश/O R D E R Per Girish Agrawal: This Appeal By The Revenue Is Arising Out Of The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) – 4, Kolkata [Hereinafter The “Ld. Cit(A)”] In Appeal No. Cit(A), Kolkata- 4/10691/2015-16, Vide Order Dt. 14/02/2018, Against The Assessment Order Passed U/S 143(3) Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Act’) By The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-12(1), Kolkata For Assessment Year 2012-13, Dated 27/03/2015. 2. Grounds Taken By The Assessee Are Reproduced As Under:- “1. That On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & In Law, The Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred By Allowing The Appeal Of The Assessee Company Stating That The Expenditure Of Rs.5,21,03,578/- Made On Account Of Repairing Work Made By The Concern M/S. Portek Systems & Equipments Pte. Ltd., Singapore Was Revenue Expenditure. 2. That On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & In Law, The Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred By Not Appreciating The Facts That The Aforesaid Repairing Work Was Not Routine Repairing Works Of The Assessee Company & It Required Technical Assistance To Bring The Ship Unloaders In A Good Condition For Future Works. Ay: 2012-13 International Seaports (Haldia) Pvt. Ltd. 2

For Appellant: Shri Somnath Ghosh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sudipto Ghosh, CIT D/R
Section 143(3)Section 40

block of machinery on account of obsolescence. Ld. Assessing Officer also invoked the provisions of Section 40(a)(i) r.w.s. 195 of the Act in respect of repair expenses disallowed by him of Rs.5,21,03,578/-. Further, ld. Assessing Officer made a disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act in respect of three expenses claimed by the assessee

D.C.I.T CIR - 1,KOLATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S PARIJAT VYAPAAR PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 2242/KOL/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata19 Feb 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi

Section 143(3)

block “plant & machinery”. During the course of assessment proceedings, Assessing Officer asked the assessee to file the supporting evidence for the addition made to the fixed assets. But the assessee failed to do so in respect of one party, namely, M/s Tyre Arcade. The AO on perusal of ledger account of M/s Tyre Arcade observed that the closing balance shown

D.C.I.T CIR - 1,KOLATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S PARIJAT VYAPAAR PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 2241/KOL/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata19 Feb 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi

Section 143(3)

block “plant & machinery”. During the course of assessment proceedings, Assessing Officer asked the assessee to file the supporting evidence for the addition made to the fixed assets. But the assessee failed to do so in respect of one party, namely, M/s Tyre Arcade. The AO on perusal of ledger account of M/s Tyre Arcade observed that the closing balance shown

ACIT(TDS) CIRCLE - 1, KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. EARNEST TOWERS PVT. LTD., KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 243/KOL/2016[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata19 Jan 2018AY 2011-2012

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy, Hon’Ble & Sri Aby T. Varkey, Hon’Ble]

Section 194Section 194ASection 194ISection 250

TDS) Circle-1 Kolkata……………………..……………………….……………………………………..Appellant 10B, Middleton Road Kolkata – 700 071 M/s. Earnest Towers Pvt. Ltd…......……………...……..………………………………………..…..Respondent 9B Wood Street 4th Floor Kolkata – 700 016 [PAN : AABCE 8612 N] Appearances by: None, appeared on behalf of the assessee. Shri G. Mallikarjuna, CIT, DR, appearing on behalf of the Revenue. Date of concluding the hearing : December 7th, 2017 Date of pronouncing