Search: section 68 | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “section 68”+ Section 17clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi6,694 Mumbai5,662 Bangalore1,860 Chennai1,358 Kolkata1,308 Ahmedabad1,253 Jaipur1,076 Hyderabad974 Pune733 Karnataka726 Surat634 Indore594 Chandigarh581 Cochin327 Raipur315 Visakhapatnam275 Rajkot272 Nagpur202 Amritsar171 Cuttack164 Agra163 Lucknow158 Telangana132 Guwahati130 SC90 Jodhpur85 Patna82 Allahabad81 Ranchi77 Calcutta74 Dehradun55 Panaji44 Varanasi25 Jabalpur24 Rajasthan14 Orissa10 Kerala9 A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN3 Gauhati3 Uttarakhand3 Andhra Pradesh1 Punjab & Haryana1 ARIJIT PASAYAT C.K. THAKKER1 ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1 A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1 Tripura1 Himachal Pradesh1 K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1 ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1

Key Topics

Section 2634 Section 41(1)4 Section 115B3 Addition to Income3 Section 682 Section 143(1)(a)2

BHIMA JEWELLERS vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

ITA/15/2021HC Kerala25 Aug 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

For Appellant: M/S BHIMA JEWELLERSFor Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Section 115Section 115BSection 263Section 68Section 69Section 69ASection 69BSection 69CSection 69D

68 will fall under any head of section 14 and is not such income beyond section 17 which

M/S.CARBON AND CHEMICALS (INDIA) LTD vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, KOCHI

ITR/70/2000HC Kerala01 Mar 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

For Respondent: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX

Section 143(1)(a)Section 201Section 256(1)Section 41(1)Section 41(1)(a)

68,152/- to be written back as deemed profits under Section 41(1) of the Act for the AY 1995-96. I.T.R. No.70/2000 -:5:- 6. We have heard Mr. Raja Kannan, the learned counsel for the assessee as well as Sri. P.K.Raveendranatha Menon, the learned Senior Advocate for the department duly instructed by Adv. Navneeth Pai. 7. The learned

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, vs. SMT.GRACY BABU,

ITA/54/2020HC Kerala03 Apr 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M.

For Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

17) It is true that S. 1 of the Indian Trusts Act makes provisions of the Act inapplicable to public or private religious or charitable endowments; and so, these sections may not in terms apply to the trust now in question. These sections however embody nothing more or less than the principles which have been applied

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. REENA JOSE

ITA/47/2020HC Kerala03 Apr 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M.

For Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

17) It is true that S. 1 of the Indian Trusts Act makes provisions of the Act inapplicable to public or private religious or charitable endowments; and so, these sections may not in terms apply to the trust now in question. These sections however embody nothing more or less than the principles which have been applied

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, vs. GRACY BABU,

ITA/48/2020HC Kerala03 Apr 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M.

For Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

17) It is true that S. 1 of the Indian Trusts Act makes provisions of the Act inapplicable to public or private religious or charitable endowments; and so, these sections may not in terms apply to the trust now in question. These sections however embody nothing more or less than the principles which have been applied

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. JOSE THOMAS,

ITA/56/2020HC Kerala03 Apr 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M.

For Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

17) It is true that S. 1 of the Indian Trusts Act makes provisions of the Act inapplicable to public or private religious or charitable endowments; and so, these sections may not in terms apply to the trust now in question. These sections however embody nothing more or less than the principles which have been applied

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. JOSE THOMAS

ITA/46/2020HC Kerala03 Apr 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M.

For Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

17) It is true that S. 1 of the Indian Trusts Act makes provisions of the Act inapplicable to public or private religious or charitable endowments; and so, these sections may not in terms apply to the trust now in question. These sections however embody nothing more or less than the principles which have been applied

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, vs. KANNAN DEVAN HILLS PLANTATIONS COMPANY PVT. LTD.,

ITA/147/2019HC Kerala05 Dec 2019

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.V.ANILKUMAR

For Respondent: STATE OF KERALA

68,04,563/-. The Assessing Officer also declined the special rebate under Section 12 since the assessee was not a registered dealer. 3. In first appeal, the addition made under section 6(2) as also the estimation made towards the probable omission and suppression on that aspect was deleted. The declining of special rebate stood confirmed. The State

AZAD RAHIM vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER

ITA/6/2020HC Kerala24 Nov 2021

Bench: This Court & Vide Judgment Dated 21.01.2004 This Court Confirmed The Order Of The Tribunal However, Granted Liberty To The Assessee To File Objections Before The

68 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR BY ADVS. G.HARIKUMAR (GOPINATHAN NAIR) SHRI.AKHIL SURESH RESPONDENT/S: THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1, KOLLAM BY ADV SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24.11.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ITA NO. 6 OF 2020 -2- JUDGMENT S.V.Bhatti,J. Azad Rahim