BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 9clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi3,495Mumbai3,324Chennai908Bangalore882Kolkata735Ahmedabad722Jaipur610Hyderabad485Pune352Chandigarh298Surat293Raipur265Indore246Rajkot218Amritsar185Visakhapatnam162Cochin132Patna108Lucknow96Nagpur94Cuttack87Guwahati86Agra77Dehradun60Allahabad48Jodhpur47Telangana38Karnataka36Panaji20Jabalpur16Ranchi12Varanasi8Kerala6Orissa6SC6Calcutta4Gauhati3Himachal Pradesh2Punjab & Haryana1Rajasthan1Uttarakhand1

Key Topics

Section 2636Section 112Block Assessment2

MOHAMMED SHERIEF, vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

ITA/2/2019HC Kerala02 Nov 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

For Appellant: MOHAMMED SHERIEFFor Respondent: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

9 of the order that the seized documents may not belong to the appellant-assessee? iii. In the absence of recording of satisfaction by the assessing authority who conducted the search under Section 132 of the Act, coupled with the finding of the Tribunal that the seized documents may not belong to the appellant assessee, whether the Appellate Tribunal

MOHAMMED SHERIEF vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/7/2019HC Kerala02 Nov 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

For Appellant: MOHAMMED SHERIEF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
For Respondent:

9 of the order that the seized documents may not belong to the appellant-assessee? iii. In the absence of recording of satisfaction by the assessing authority who conducted the search under Section 132 of the Act, coupled with the finding of the Tribunal that the seized documents may not belong to the appellant assessee, whether the Appellate Tribunal

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX(EXEMPTIONS) vs. M/S CHOICE FOUNDATION

ITA/180/2019HC Kerala11 Nov 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

Section 11Section 11(5)Section 12Section 13(8)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 154Section 2(24)(iia)Section 260ASection 263

147 r.w.s. 148 of the I.T.Act, the period of limitation provided u/s 263(2) of the I.T.Act would begin to run from the date of intimation u/s 143(1) of the I.T.Act and not from the date of order of reassessment. As mentioned earlier, if the period of limitation is to be reckoned from the date of intimation u/s

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, vs. PTL ENTERPRISES LIMITED,

ITA/483/2009HC Kerala19 Jul 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

For Appellant: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXFor Respondent: M/S.PREMIER TYRES LTD

147 of the Income Tax Act (for short 'the Act') and the rental income received by the assessee from Apollo Tyres Ltd. (for short 'ATL') whether constitutes business income or income from other sources. The background circumstances relevant for ITA Nos.757/2009 and batch cases 12 disposing of the batch cases are substantially similar. Hence the learned counsel appearing for both

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. PREMIER TYRES LTD.

ITA/758/2009HC Kerala19 Jul 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

For Appellant: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXFor Respondent: M/S.PREMIER TYRES LTD

147 of the Income Tax Act (for short 'the Act') and the rental income received by the assessee from Apollo Tyres Ltd. (for short 'ATL') whether constitutes business income or income from other sources. The background circumstances relevant for ITA Nos.757/2009 and batch cases 12 disposing of the batch cases are substantially similar. Hence the learned counsel appearing for both

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. PREMIER TYRES LTD.

ITA/929/2009HC Kerala19 Jul 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

For Appellant: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXFor Respondent: M/S.PREMIER TYRES LTD

147 of the Income Tax Act (for short 'the Act') and the rental income received by the assessee from Apollo Tyres Ltd. (for short 'ATL') whether constitutes business income or income from other sources. The background circumstances relevant for ITA Nos.757/2009 and batch cases 12 disposing of the batch cases are substantially similar. Hence the learned counsel appearing for both