BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “reassessment”+ Section 9clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi5,620Mumbai4,831Chennai1,567Bangalore1,367Kolkata1,129Ahmedabad902Jaipur769Hyderabad696Raipur481Pune461Chandigarh404Surat379Indore327Amritsar283Rajkot271Cochin246Visakhapatnam212Cuttack183Karnataka182Patna156Nagpur148Agra120Lucknow118Guwahati106Dehradun101Telangana86Ranchi85Jodhpur69Allahabad60SC45Panaji37Calcutta21Jabalpur17Varanasi13Orissa12Rajasthan10Kerala9Punjab & Haryana4A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN3Gauhati3Himachal Pradesh2J&K1Uttarakhand1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1

Key Topics

Section 2636Addition to Income3Section 112Block Assessment2

MOHAMMED SHERIEF, vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

ITA/2/2019HC Kerala02 Nov 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

For Appellant: MOHAMMED SHERIEFFor Respondent: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

9 of the order that the seized documents may not belong to the appellant-assessee? iii. In the absence of recording of satisfaction by the assessing authority who conducted the search under Section 132 of the Act, coupled with the finding of the Tribunal that the seized documents may not belong to the appellant assessee, whether the Appellate Tribunal

MOHAMMED SHERIEF vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/7/2019HC Kerala02 Nov 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

For Appellant: MOHAMMED SHERIEF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
For Respondent:

9 of the order that the seized documents may not belong to the appellant-assessee? iii. In the absence of recording of satisfaction by the assessing authority who conducted the search under Section 132 of the Act, coupled with the finding of the Tribunal that the seized documents may not belong to the appellant assessee, whether the Appellate Tribunal

KERALA CRICKET ASSOCIATION vs. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/40/2012HC Kerala07 Dec 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

For Appellant: KERALA CRICKET ASSOCIATIONFor Respondent: THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

9. We have appreciated the consensus in the submissions made by the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the parties. A few other judgments were also cited in support of the argument made under Section 148 of the Act. We are not referring to those judgments because of the suggested course of action by the Senior Counsel for re-examining

KERALA CRICKET ASSOCIATION vs. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/39/2012HC Kerala07 Dec 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

For Appellant: KERALA CRICKET ASSOCIATIONFor Respondent: THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

9. We have appreciated the consensus in the submissions made by the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the parties. A few other judgments were also cited in support of the argument made under Section 148 of the Act. We are not referring to those judgments because of the suggested course of action by the Senior Counsel for re-examining

KERALA CRICKET ASSOCIATION, KCA COMPLEX, SASTHAMKOVIL ROAD, vs. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE 2,

ITA/38/2012HC Kerala07 Dec 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

For Appellant: KERALA CRICKET ASSOCIATIONFor Respondent: THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

9. We have appreciated the consensus in the submissions made by the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the parties. A few other judgments were also cited in support of the argument made under Section 148 of the Act. We are not referring to those judgments because of the suggested course of action by the Senior Counsel for re-examining

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. PREMIER TYRES LTD.

ITA/929/2009HC Kerala19 Jul 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

For Appellant: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXFor Respondent: M/S.PREMIER TYRES LTD

9 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS MONDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF JULY 2021 / 28TH ASHADHA, 1943 ITA NO. 1482 OF 2009 AGAINST THE ORDER IN ITA 658/COCH/2005 OF I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH, ERNAKULAM APPELLANT/APPELLANT: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COCHIN COCHIN. BY ADV SRI.JOSE JOSEPH

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, vs. PTL ENTERPRISES LIMITED,

ITA/483/2009HC Kerala19 Jul 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

For Appellant: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXFor Respondent: M/S.PREMIER TYRES LTD

9 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS MONDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF JULY 2021 / 28TH ASHADHA, 1943 ITA NO. 1482 OF 2009 AGAINST THE ORDER IN ITA 658/COCH/2005 OF I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH, ERNAKULAM APPELLANT/APPELLANT: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COCHIN COCHIN. BY ADV SRI.JOSE JOSEPH

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. PREMIER TYRES LTD.

ITA/758/2009HC Kerala19 Jul 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

For Appellant: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXFor Respondent: M/S.PREMIER TYRES LTD

9 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS MONDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF JULY 2021 / 28TH ASHADHA, 1943 ITA NO. 1482 OF 2009 AGAINST THE ORDER IN ITA 658/COCH/2005 OF I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH, ERNAKULAM APPELLANT/APPELLANT: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COCHIN COCHIN. BY ADV SRI.JOSE JOSEPH

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX(EXEMPTIONS) vs. M/S CHOICE FOUNDATION

ITA/180/2019HC Kerala11 Nov 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

Section 11Section 11(5)Section 12Section 13(8)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 154Section 2(24)(iia)Section 260ASection 263

section 263 of the IT Act as not in accordance with law and hence invalid by holding that contributions to the building fund amounting to Rs.20891000 are in the nature of corpus donations especially when there are no specific directions from the donors regarding the quantum of contributions to be part of the corpus of the trust or institution