BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “reassessment”+ Section 35(1)(iv)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,435Mumbai921Bangalore433Chennai362Jaipur337Ahmedabad242Chandigarh174Hyderabad170Kolkata142Indore121Raipur100Amritsar89Surat73Cochin71Pune67Rajkot66Visakhapatnam59Karnataka50Cuttack44Telangana42Guwahati40Lucknow38Nagpur34Patna33Ranchi26Agra23SC19Jodhpur18Dehradun13Allahabad10Orissa7Kerala5Calcutta5Rajasthan3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN3Panaji3Varanasi3Jabalpur2Uttarakhand1Gauhati1

K.M. FATHIMA, vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

ITA/76/2018HC Kerala11 Mar 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

IV/ 2011-12 dt.31.03.2016 ITA 427/C/2016 dt.23.04.2018 53/2018 2.1 The assessee is the wife of one K A Rauf and a partner in M/s. Nilambur Traders and Director of K A Latex (P) Ltd, Vazhakkad. On 05.11.2009, a search of the assessee’s husband K A Rauf's residence and his associates were carried out under ITA Nos.67/2018, 74/2018, 66/2018

K.M. FATHIMA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/53/2018HC Kerala11 Mar 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

IV/ 2011-12 dt.31.03.2016 ITA 427/C/2016 dt.23.04.2018 53/2018 2.1 The assessee is the wife of one K A Rauf and a partner in M/s. Nilambur Traders and Director of K A Latex (P) Ltd, Vazhakkad. On 05.11.2009, a search of the assessee’s husband K A Rauf's residence and his associates were carried out under ITA Nos.67/2018, 74/2018, 66/2018

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. PREMIER TYRES LTD.

ITA/758/2009HC Kerala19 Jul 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

For Appellant: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXFor Respondent: M/S.PREMIER TYRES LTD

reassessment completed under the main provision within four years, in accordance with law. 2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case should not the Tribunal have applied the ratio of the decision of the Supreme Court reported in 129 taxmann 72 in CIT v Forainer France. 3. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, vs. PTL ENTERPRISES LIMITED,

ITA/483/2009HC Kerala19 Jul 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

For Appellant: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXFor Respondent: M/S.PREMIER TYRES LTD

reassessment completed under the main provision within four years, in accordance with law. 2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case should not the Tribunal have applied the ratio of the decision of the Supreme Court reported in 129 taxmann 72 in CIT v Forainer France. 3. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. PREMIER TYRES LTD.

ITA/929/2009HC Kerala19 Jul 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

For Appellant: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXFor Respondent: M/S.PREMIER TYRES LTD

reassessment completed under the main provision within four years, in accordance with law. 2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case should not the Tribunal have applied the ratio of the decision of the Supreme Court reported in 129 taxmann 72 in CIT v Forainer France. 3. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances