BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “reassessment”+ Section 260Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi370Mumbai66Chennai47Jaipur34Amritsar33Karnataka32Bangalore31Calcutta29Kolkata17Nagpur14Hyderabad11Lucknow8Dehradun8Raipur7Telangana7Indore6Kerala6SC5Agra4Ahmedabad4Punjab & Haryana4Jodhpur3Surat3Pune2Himachal Pradesh2Gauhati2Uttarakhand1Rajasthan1Madhya Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 153A4Section 153C4Section 260A2Section 1322Section 142(1)2Block Assessment2Reassessment2

K.R. RAZIYA, vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

ITA/61/2018HC Kerala14 Mar 2022

Bench: This Court Under Section 260A Of The Income Tax Act 1961 (For Short ‘The Act’). The Details Of Orders Of Assessment Etc. Are Stated In The Following Table:

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 153ASection 153CSection 260A

260A of the Income Tax Act 1961 (for short ‘the Act’). The details of orders of assessment etc. are stated in the following table: ITA Nos.61 & 64/2018 -4- Sl. No. Assessment Year & Date of Assessment Order Order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITA No. 1 2007-08; 30.12.2011 ITA C-161-162/Cent/CIT

K.R.RAIZA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/64/2018HC Kerala
14 Mar 2022

Bench: This Court Under Section 260A Of The Income Tax Act 1961 (For Short ‘The Act’). The Details Of Orders Of Assessment Etc. Are Stated In The Following Table:

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 153ASection 153CSection 260A

260A of the Income Tax Act 1961 (for short ‘the Act’). The details of orders of assessment etc. are stated in the following table: ITA Nos.61 & 64/2018 -4- Sl. No. Assessment Year & Date of Assessment Order Order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITA No. 1 2007-08; 30.12.2011 ITA C-161-162/Cent/CIT

K.M. FATHIMA, vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

ITA/76/2018HC Kerala11 Mar 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

260A of the Income Tax Act 1961 (for short, ‘the Act’). The details of assessment orders, etc., are stated in the following table: ITA Nos.67/2018, 74/2018, 66/2018, 76/2018, 53/2018, 80/2018 -8- Sl. No. Assessment Year & Date of Assessment Order Order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITA No. 1 2004-05; 30.12.2011 ITA C-130-135

K.M. FATHIMA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/53/2018HC Kerala11 Mar 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

260A of the Income Tax Act 1961 (for short, ‘the Act’). The details of assessment orders, etc., are stated in the following table: ITA Nos.67/2018, 74/2018, 66/2018, 76/2018, 53/2018, 80/2018 -8- Sl. No. Assessment Year & Date of Assessment Order Order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITA No. 1 2004-05; 30.12.2011 ITA C-130-135

MOHAMMED SHERIEF, vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

ITA/2/2019HC Kerala02 Nov 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

For Appellant: MOHAMMED SHERIEFFor Respondent: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

260A of the Act. 5. Adv. Kuryan Thomas made comprehensive submissions on the following substantial questions of law: “i. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was correct in upholding the validity of the assessment under Section 153C of the Act, more so when the "satisfaction" of the assessing authority who conducted the search, that

MOHAMMED SHERIEF vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/7/2019HC Kerala02 Nov 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

For Appellant: MOHAMMED SHERIEFFor Respondent: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

260A of the Act. 5. Adv. Kuryan Thomas made comprehensive submissions on the following substantial questions of law: “i. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was correct in upholding the validity of the assessment under Section 153C of the Act, more so when the "satisfaction" of the assessing authority who conducted the search, that