KERALA CRICKET ASSOCIATION, KCA COMPLEX, SASTHAMKOVIL ROAD, vs. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE 2,

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

2) Where an application has been made on or after the 1st day of June, 2007, the provisions of sections 11 and 12 shall apply in relation to the income of such trust or institution from the ITA 37/12 ITA 38/12 ITA 39/12, ITA 40/12 and ITA 42/12 10 assessment year immediately following the financial year in which such application

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX(EXEMPTIONS) vs. M/S CHOICE FOUNDATION

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

2(24)(iia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. If it is to be treated as a corpus donation, the same can only be excluded in computing the total income under the provisions of section 11 & 12 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. By virtue of section 13(8) of the Income Tax Act, the Assessing Officer had held that

MOHAMMED SHERIEF, vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

2. Render such other orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. 5. The learned Government Pleader contends that the absence of Section 4(2B) does not, in any way, affect the method and mode of calculation provided for under Rule 3C of the Rules. There is no dispute that

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. PREMIER TYRES LTD.

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

reassessment completed under the main provision within four years, in accordance with law. 2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case should not the Tribunal have applied the ratio of the decision of the Supreme Court reported in 129 taxmann 72 in CIT v Forainer France. 3. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. PREMIER TYRES LTD.

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

reassessment completed under the main provision within four years, in accordance with law. 2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case should not the Tribunal have applied the ratio of the decision of the Supreme Court reported in 129 taxmann 72 in CIT v Forainer France. 3. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, vs. PTL ENTERPRISES LIMITED,

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

reassessment completed under the main provision within four years, in accordance with law. 2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case should not the Tribunal have applied the ratio of the decision of the Supreme Court reported in 129 taxmann 72 in CIT v Forainer France. 3. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TVM vs. M/S HOTEL SUN BEAM, ATTAKULANGARA TVM

Appeal is dismissed as indicated above

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

reassessment made by the Assessing Officer treating the status as AOP as against the assessee’s claim as registered firm is in order in view of the legal position under Abkari Act ITA NO. 197 OF 2009 -3- and Income tax Act? 2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and also in the light