MOHAMMED SHERIEF, vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

section 153C(2) had to be in the light of the satisfaction that the books of account or mate rials seized are relevant (i.e. "that Assessing Officer shall proceed against each such other person and issue notice and assess or reassess

KERALA CRICKET ASSOCIATION vs. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

2) Where an application has been made on or after the 1st day of June, 2007, the provisions of sections 11 and 12 shall apply in relation to the income of such trust or institution from the ITA 37/12 ITA 38/12 ITA 39/12, ITA 40/12 and ITA 42/12 10 assessment year immediately following the financial year in which such application

KERALA CRICKET ASSOCIATION vs. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

2) Where an application has been made on or after the 1st day of June, 2007, the provisions of sections 11 and 12 shall apply in relation to the income of such trust or institution from the ITA 37/12 ITA 38/12 ITA 39/12, ITA 40/12 and ITA 42/12 10 assessment year immediately following the financial year in which such application

KERALA CRICKET ASSOCIATION, KCA COMPLEX, SASTHAMKOVIL ROAD, vs. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE 2,

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

2) Where an application has been made on or after the 1st day of June, 2007, the provisions of sections 11 and 12 shall apply in relation to the income of such trust or institution from the ITA 37/12 ITA 38/12 ITA 39/12, ITA 40/12 and ITA 42/12 10 assessment year immediately following the financial year in which such application

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX(EXEMPTIONS) vs. M/S CHOICE FOUNDATION

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

2(24)(iia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. If it is to be treated as a corpus donation, the same can only be excluded in computing the total income under the provisions of section 11 & 12 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. By virtue of section 13(8) of the Income Tax Act, the Assessing Officer had held that

K.R. RAZIYA, vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

Bench: This Court Under Section 260A Of The Income Tax Act 1961 (For Short ‘The Act’). The Details Of Orders Of Assessment Etc. Are Stated In The Following Table:

2) The seized documents do not constitute valuable articles or things or books of accounts or documents belong to the assessee. Therefore, the reassessment set in motion under Section

K.R.RAIZA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: This Court Under Section 260A Of The Income Tax Act 1961 (For Short ‘The Act’). The Details Of Orders Of Assessment Etc. Are Stated In The Following Table:

2) The seized documents do not constitute valuable articles or things or books of accounts or documents belong to the assessee. Therefore, the reassessment set in motion under Section

K.M. FATHIMA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

2) The seized documents do not constitute valuable articles or things or books of accounts or documents belonging to the assessee herein. Therefore, the reassessment set in motion under Section

K.M. FATHIMA, vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

2) The seized documents do not constitute valuable articles or things or books of accounts or documents belonging to the assessee herein. Therefore, the reassessment set in motion under Section

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), vs. MS/.LOVE IN ACTION SOCIETY NALANCHIRA,

Appeal is allowed as

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM

2. The Commissioner of Tax (Exemptions), Kochi/Revenue is the appellant. M/s. Love in Action Society/assessee is the respondent. The assessee, on 07.10.2013 filed income tax returns for the Assessment Year 2013-14. The assessee is a Charitable Society registered under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, 'the Act'). On 29.03.2016 the assessment for the subject year

MOHAMMED SHERIEF, vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

2. Render such other orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. 5. The learned Government Pleader contends that the absence of Section 4(2B) does not, in any way, affect the method and mode of calculation provided for under Rule 3C of the Rules. There is no dispute that

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, vs. PTL ENTERPRISES LIMITED,

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

reassessment completed under the main provision within four years, in accordance with law. 2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case should not the Tribunal have applied the ratio of the decision of the Supreme Court reported in 129 taxmann 72 in CIT v Forainer France. 3. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. PREMIER TYRES LTD.

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

reassessment completed under the main provision within four years, in accordance with law. 2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case should not the Tribunal have applied the ratio of the decision of the Supreme Court reported in 129 taxmann 72 in CIT v Forainer France. 3. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. PREMIER TYRES LTD.

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

reassessment completed under the main provision within four years, in accordance with law. 2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case should not the Tribunal have applied the ratio of the decision of the Supreme Court reported in 129 taxmann 72 in CIT v Forainer France. 3. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TVM vs. M/S HOTEL SUN BEAM, ATTAKULANGARA TVM

Appeal is dismissed as indicated above

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

reassessment made by the Assessing Officer treating the status as AOP as against the assessee’s claim as registered firm is in order in view of the legal position under Abkari Act ITA NO. 197 OF 2009 -3- and Income tax Act? 2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and also in the light