BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “reassessment”+ Section 153(1)(a)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi2,118Mumbai1,410Chennai552Bangalore523Jaipur279Hyderabad256Kolkata194Chandigarh141Ahmedabad129Amritsar120Pune92Surat77Raipur74Indore69Visakhapatnam62Guwahati59Cochin54Karnataka53Lucknow46Cuttack45Nagpur41Telangana39Dehradun38Patna37Rajkot31Ranchi27Allahabad22Jodhpur22SC16Panaji15Jabalpur5Agra5Punjab & Haryana5Calcutta5Orissa4Rajasthan3Gauhati2Varanasi2Kerala2K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1

Key Topics

Block Assessment2

MOHAMMED SHERIEF, vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

ITA/2/2019HC Kerala02 Nov 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

For Appellant: MOHAMMED SHERIEFFor Respondent: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

1. "The assessment for the year 2003-04 made under section 153A r.w.s. 153C is bad in law and invalid, since no satisfaction has been reached and recorded by the assessing officer who searched Mr. E. Shemsudhin, that the undisclosed income revealed in the search belonged to the assessee appellant and the procedure prescribed under section 153C having not followed

MOHAMMED SHERIEF vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/7/2019HC Kerala02 Nov 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

For Appellant: MOHAMMED SHERIEF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
For Respondent:

1. "The assessment for the year 2003-04 made under section 153A r.w.s. 153C is bad in law and invalid, since no satisfaction has been reached and recorded by the assessing officer who searched Mr. E. Shemsudhin, that the undisclosed income revealed in the search belonged to the assessee appellant and the procedure prescribed under section 153C having not followed