BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

10 results for “reassessment”+ Section 147clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai4,538Delhi4,352Chennai1,303Bangalore1,111Kolkata964Ahmedabad853Jaipur574Hyderabad539Pune392Chandigarh285Indore261Raipur238Rajkot227Surat216Amritsar141Cochin141Visakhapatnam140Patna121Karnataka116Nagpur109Lucknow100Agra97Guwahati86Telangana65Cuttack61Dehradun57Jodhpur57Allahabad43Calcutta40Ranchi35SC27Panaji21Jabalpur13Kerala10Punjab & Haryana8Varanasi8Orissa8Rajasthan6Gauhati3Himachal Pradesh2Madhya Pradesh1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1Uttarakhand1

Key Topics

Section 2636Addition to Income3Section 112Section 143(3)2Block Assessment2

MOHAMMED SHERIEF, vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

ITA/2/2019HC Kerala02 Nov 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

For Appellant: MOHAMMED SHERIEFFor Respondent: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

147, section 148, section 149, section 151 and section 153, where the Assessing Officer is satisfied that, - (a) any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article or thing, seized or requisitioned, belongs to; or (b) any books of account or documents, seized or requisitioned, pertains or pertain to, or any information contained therein, relates to, a person other than

MOHAMMED SHERIEF vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/7/2019HC Kerala02 Nov 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

For Appellant: MOHAMMED SHERIEF
For Respondent: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

147, section 148, section 149, section 151 and section 153, where the Assessing Officer is satisfied that, - (a) any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article or thing, seized or requisitioned, belongs to; or (b) any books of account or documents, seized or requisitioned, pertains or pertain to, or any information contained therein, relates to, a person other than

KERALA CRICKET ASSOCIATION vs. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/40/2012HC Kerala07 Dec 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

For Appellant: KERALA CRICKET ASSOCIATIONFor Respondent: THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

147 shall be taken by the Assessing Officer in case of such trust or institution for any assessment year preceding the aforesaid assessment year only for non- registration of such trust or institution for the said assessment year: Provided also that provisions contained in the first and second proviso shall not apply in case of any trust or institution which

KERALA CRICKET ASSOCIATION vs. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/39/2012HC Kerala07 Dec 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

For Appellant: KERALA CRICKET ASSOCIATIONFor Respondent: THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

147 shall be taken by the Assessing Officer in case of such trust or institution for any assessment year preceding the aforesaid assessment year only for non- registration of such trust or institution for the said assessment year: Provided also that provisions contained in the first and second proviso shall not apply in case of any trust or institution which

KERALA CRICKET ASSOCIATION, KCA COMPLEX, SASTHAMKOVIL ROAD, vs. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE 2,

ITA/38/2012HC Kerala07 Dec 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

For Appellant: KERALA CRICKET ASSOCIATIONFor Respondent: THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

147 shall be taken by the Assessing Officer in case of such trust or institution for any assessment year preceding the aforesaid assessment year only for non- registration of such trust or institution for the said assessment year: Provided also that provisions contained in the first and second proviso shall not apply in case of any trust or institution which

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. PREMIER TYRES LTD.

ITA/929/2009HC Kerala19 Jul 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

For Appellant: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXFor Respondent: M/S.PREMIER TYRES LTD

147 of the Income Tax Act (for short 'the Act') and the rental income received by the assessee from Apollo Tyres Ltd. (for short 'ATL') whether constitutes business income or income from other sources. The background circumstances relevant for ITA Nos.757/2009 and batch cases 12 disposing of the batch cases are substantially similar. Hence the learned counsel appearing for both

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, vs. PTL ENTERPRISES LIMITED,

ITA/483/2009HC Kerala19 Jul 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

For Appellant: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXFor Respondent: M/S.PREMIER TYRES LTD

147 of the Income Tax Act (for short 'the Act') and the rental income received by the assessee from Apollo Tyres Ltd. (for short 'ATL') whether constitutes business income or income from other sources. The background circumstances relevant for ITA Nos.757/2009 and batch cases 12 disposing of the batch cases are substantially similar. Hence the learned counsel appearing for both

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. PREMIER TYRES LTD.

ITA/758/2009HC Kerala19 Jul 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

For Appellant: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXFor Respondent: M/S.PREMIER TYRES LTD

147 of the Income Tax Act (for short 'the Act') and the rental income received by the assessee from Apollo Tyres Ltd. (for short 'ATL') whether constitutes business income or income from other sources. The background circumstances relevant for ITA Nos.757/2009 and batch cases 12 disposing of the batch cases are substantially similar. Hence the learned counsel appearing for both

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX(EXEMPTIONS) vs. M/S CHOICE FOUNDATION

ITA/180/2019HC Kerala11 Nov 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

Section 11Section 11(5)Section 12Section 13(8)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 154Section 2(24)(iia)Section 260ASection 263

147 r.w.s. 148 of the I.T.Act, the period of limitation provided u/s 263(2) of the I.T.Act would begin to run from the date of intimation u/s 143(1) of the I.T.Act and not from the date of order of reassessment. As mentioned earlier, if the period of limitation is to be reckoned from the date of intimation

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TVM vs. M/S HOTEL SUN BEAM, ATTAKULANGARA TVM

Appeal is dismissed as indicated above

ITA/197/2009HC Kerala07 Dec 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

For Appellant: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXFor Respondent: M/S HOTEL SUN BEAM, ATTAKULANGARA
Section 143(3)Section 185

reassessment made by the Assessing Officer treating the status as AOP as against the assessee’s claim as registered firm is in order in view of the legal position under Abkari Act ITA NO. 197 OF 2009 -3- and Income tax Act? 2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and also in the light