BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “reassessment”+ Section 143(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai4,947Delhi4,813Chennai1,380Kolkata1,213Bangalore1,138Ahmedabad624Jaipur604Hyderabad470Chandigarh307Pune291Indore231Raipur221Rajkot196Cochin177Surat159Amritsar149Patna127Karnataka123Nagpur113Visakhapatnam100Lucknow95Guwahati92Agra83Ranchi70Dehradun68Cuttack63Telangana63Jodhpur58Calcutta40Allahabad40SC25Panaji22Jabalpur10Orissa10Kerala8Rajasthan7Punjab & Haryana6Varanasi4Himachal Pradesh2Gauhati2Madhya Pradesh1Uttarakhand1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1

Key Topics

Section 26314Section 143(3)4Section 112Block Assessment2Exemption2Reassessment2Revision u/s 2632

MOHAMMED SHERIEF vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/7/2019HC Kerala02 Nov 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

For Appellant: MOHAMMED SHERIEFFor Respondent: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

143(2) had been issued to the assessee, and the time provided by law had expired by the time its Assessing Officer received the papers from the searched party. The notice issued, necessarily, in terms of section 153C(2) had to be in the light of the satisfaction that the books of account or mate rials seized are relevant

MOHAMMED SHERIEF, vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

ITA/2/2019HC Kerala02 Nov 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

For Appellant: MOHAMMED SHERIEF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
For Respondent:

143(2) had been issued to the assessee, and the time provided by law had expired by the time its Assessing Officer received the papers from the searched party. The notice issued, necessarily, in terms of section 153C(2) had to be in the light of the satisfaction that the books of account or mate rials seized are relevant

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), vs. MS/.LOVE IN ACTION SOCIETY NALANCHIRA,

Appeal is allowed as

ITA/282/2019HC Kerala08 Sept 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM

Section 11(1)Section 11(1)(d)Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 263

2. The Commissioner of Tax (Exemptions), Kochi/Revenue is the appellant. M/s. Love in Action Society/assessee is the respondent. The assessee, on 07.10.2013 filed income tax returns for the Assessment Year 2013-14. The assessee is a Charitable Society registered under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, 'the Act'). On 29.03.2016 the assessment for the subject year

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX(EXEMPTIONS) vs. M/S CHOICE FOUNDATION

ITA/180/2019HC Kerala11 Nov 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

Section 11Section 11(5)Section 12Section 13(8)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 154Section 2(24)(iia)Section 260ASection 263

2) of the I.T.Act would begin to run from the date of intimation u/s 143(1) of the I.T.Act and not from the date of order of reassessment. As mentioned earlier, if the period of limitation is to be reckoned from the date of intimation u/s 143(1) of the I.T.Act, the Commissioner ought to have initiated revisionary proceedings

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. PREMIER TYRES LTD.

ITA/929/2009HC Kerala19 Jul 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

For Appellant: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXFor Respondent: M/S.PREMIER TYRES LTD

143(3). The assessment was completed by treating the lease rent received from Apollo Tyres Ltd. amounting to Rs.6,61,75,914/- as income from business of the assessee. Thereafter the AO issued notice dated 23.3.2001 and ITA Nos.757/2009 and batch cases 15 reopened the assessment under Section 148 of the Act. The proposed re-assessment principally

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, vs. PTL ENTERPRISES LIMITED,

ITA/483/2009HC Kerala19 Jul 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

For Appellant: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXFor Respondent: M/S.PREMIER TYRES LTD

143(3). The assessment was completed by treating the lease rent received from Apollo Tyres Ltd. amounting to Rs.6,61,75,914/- as income from business of the assessee. Thereafter the AO issued notice dated 23.3.2001 and ITA Nos.757/2009 and batch cases 15 reopened the assessment under Section 148 of the Act. The proposed re-assessment principally

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. PREMIER TYRES LTD.

ITA/758/2009HC Kerala19 Jul 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

For Appellant: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXFor Respondent: M/S.PREMIER TYRES LTD

143(3). The assessment was completed by treating the lease rent received from Apollo Tyres Ltd. amounting to Rs.6,61,75,914/- as income from business of the assessee. Thereafter the AO issued notice dated 23.3.2001 and ITA Nos.757/2009 and batch cases 15 reopened the assessment under Section 148 of the Act. The proposed re-assessment principally

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TVM vs. M/S HOTEL SUN BEAM, ATTAKULANGARA TVM

Appeal is dismissed as indicated above

ITA/197/2009HC Kerala07 Dec 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

For Appellant: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXFor Respondent: M/S HOTEL SUN BEAM, ATTAKULANGARA
Section 143(3)Section 185

reassessment made by the Assessing Officer treating the status as AOP as against the assessee’s claim as registered firm is in order in view of the legal position under Abkari Act ITA NO. 197 OF 2009 -3- and Income tax Act? 2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and also in the light