BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “house property”+ Section 58clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,588Mumbai1,420Bangalore592Karnataka584Chennai310Jaipur271Kolkata195Hyderabad192Ahmedabad191Telangana119Chandigarh114Surat83Pune77Cochin76Indore70Calcutta54Raipur52Lucknow51Rajkot37SC31Cuttack28Amritsar26Nagpur25Agra25Visakhapatnam15Jodhpur9Guwahati7Rajasthan7Allahabad5Orissa5Patna5Varanasi5Dehradun4Kerala2Jabalpur2Punjab & Haryana2T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1ARIJIT PASAYAT C.K. THAKKER1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 80P(2)2Deduction2

HOSDURG RANGE KALLU CHETHU THOZHILALI VYAVASAYA SAHAKARANA SANGHAM, vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

ITA/57/2019HC Kerala23 Nov 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)

58 OF 2019 AGAINST THE ORDER IN ITA 266/2015 OF I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH, ERNAKULAM APPELLANT/S: M/S.HOSDURG RANGE KALLU CHETHU THOZHILALI VYAVASAYA SAHAKARANA SANGHAM, KOTTACHERY, KANHANGAD, KASARAGOD DISTRICT - 671 315. BY ADVS. S.ARUN RAJ SMT.C.T.SUJA RESPONDENT/S: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, MANANCHIRA, CALICUT -673 001. SC CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR HEARING

M/S. APPOLLO TYRES LTD vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/249/2015HC Kerala26 Aug 2021

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM

Section 40

house property? 4. The learned Counsel appearing for the assessee and the Revenue would state that the questions covered by (a) and (b) are similar to the questions raised by the assessee for the Assessment Year 2003-04 in ITA No.26/2013. This Court vide order dated 29.07.2021 has answered the said questions against the assessee and in favour