BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “house property”+ Section 54(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,938Mumbai1,765Bangalore750Karnataka583Chennai493Jaipur276Kolkata244Ahmedabad239Hyderabad237Chandigarh165Surat112Telangana107Pune100Indore94Cochin78Raipur61Calcutta56Lucknow49Visakhapatnam39Cuttack37Rajkot36SC34Nagpur32Amritsar31Patna28Agra27Guwahati25Rajasthan12Jodhpur12Kerala7Allahabad6Varanasi6Orissa4Jabalpur3Ranchi3Punjab & Haryana2Dehradun2Himachal Pradesh1ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1Gauhati1Andhra Pradesh1

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. REENA JOSE

ITA/47/2020HC Kerala03 Apr 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M.

For Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

54, 55, 56 & 68/20 & 6/21 :: 22 :: subsequent decisions of the High Court that the Finance Act, 1994, amended section 55(2) to provide that the cost of acquisition of, inter alia, a tenancy right. would be taken as nil. By this amendment, the judicial interpretation put on capital assets for the purposes of the provisions relating to capital gains

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. JOSE THOMAS

ITA/46/2020HC Kerala03 Apr 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M.

For Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

54, 55, 56 & 68/20 & 6/21 :: 22 :: subsequent decisions of the High Court that the Finance Act, 1994, amended section 55(2) to provide that the cost of acquisition of, inter alia, a tenancy right. would be taken as nil. By this amendment, the judicial interpretation put on capital assets for the purposes of the provisions relating to capital gains

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, vs. SMT.GRACY BABU,

ITA/54/2020HC Kerala03 Apr 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M.

For Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

54, 55, 56 & 68/20 & 6/21 :: 22 :: subsequent decisions of the High Court that the Finance Act, 1994, amended section 55(2) to provide that the cost of acquisition of, inter alia, a tenancy right. would be taken as nil. By this amendment, the judicial interpretation put on capital assets for the purposes of the provisions relating to capital gains

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, vs. GRACY BABU,

ITA/48/2020HC Kerala03 Apr 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M.

For Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

54, 55, 56 & 68/20 & 6/21 :: 22 :: subsequent decisions of the High Court that the Finance Act, 1994, amended section 55(2) to provide that the cost of acquisition of, inter alia, a tenancy right. would be taken as nil. By this amendment, the judicial interpretation put on capital assets for the purposes of the provisions relating to capital gains

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. JOSE THOMAS,

ITA/56/2020HC Kerala03 Apr 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M.

For Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

54, 55, 56 & 68/20 & 6/21 :: 22 :: subsequent decisions of the High Court that the Finance Act, 1994, amended section 55(2) to provide that the cost of acquisition of, inter alia, a tenancy right. would be taken as nil. By this amendment, the judicial interpretation put on capital assets for the purposes of the provisions relating to capital gains

K.M. FATHIMA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/53/2018HC Kerala11 Mar 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

54 YEARS SHELTER, JAYANTHI NAGAR, P.T.USHA ROAD, CALICUT. BY ADVS. HARISANKAR V. MENON; MEERA V.MENON; K.KRISHNA RESPONDENT/S: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOCHI-682 013. SC JOSE JOSEPH THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR HEARING ON 11.03.2022, ALONG WITH ITA.67/2018 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ITA Nos.67/2018, 74/2018, 66/2018, 76/2018

K.M. FATHIMA, vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

ITA/76/2018HC Kerala11 Mar 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

54 YEARS SHELTER, JAYANTHI NAGAR, P.T.USHA ROAD, CALICUT. BY ADVS. HARISANKAR V. MENON; MEERA V.MENON; K.KRISHNA RESPONDENT/S: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOCHI-682 013. SC JOSE JOSEPH THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR HEARING ON 11.03.2022, ALONG WITH ITA.67/2018 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ITA Nos.67/2018, 74/2018, 66/2018, 76/2018