BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “house property”+ Section 35(1)(iv)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,581Mumbai1,188Bangalore594Karnataka580Jaipur266Chennai262Kolkata180Chandigarh175Hyderabad166Surat128Ahmedabad124Telangana94Indore79Cochin78Rajkot71Raipur67Pune66Calcutta55Lucknow44SC37Cuttack33Visakhapatnam30Amritsar30Nagpur26Guwahati22Patna17Agra13Jodhpur8Kerala8Rajasthan7Varanasi6Orissa6Allahabad3Dehradun2Andhra Pradesh2Ranchi1Punjab & Haryana1Panaji1Himachal Pradesh1T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 403Section 9(1)(vii)3Section 10A2

M/S. DEVICE DRIVEN (INDIA) PVT. LTD. vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/257/2014HC Kerala13 Oct 2020

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI

Section 10ASection 10BSection 143(1)Section 195Section 40Section 9(1)(vii)

iv) treasury services and (v) risk management services. Reading the Explanation, it was found that the said services would come within the ambit of ‘technical services' as consultancy services. The Explanation does not confine the technical services to those which are strictly technical in nature. 12. Annexure-B contract specifically defines the role of the Commission Agent, which is stated

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. JOSE THOMAS,

ITA/56/2020
HC Kerala
03 Apr 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M.

For Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

iv) of sub-section (1) of section 49shall be taken to be nil; (aa) in a case where, by virtue of holding a capital asset, being a share or any other security, within the meaning of clause (h) of section 2 of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 (42 of 1956) (hereafter in this clause referred to as the financial

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. JOSE THOMAS

ITA/46/2020HC Kerala03 Apr 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M.

For Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

iv) of sub-section (1) of section 49shall be taken to be nil; (aa) in a case where, by virtue of holding a capital asset, being a share or any other security, within the meaning of clause (h) of section 2 of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 (42 of 1956) (hereafter in this clause referred to as the financial

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, vs. SMT.GRACY BABU,

ITA/54/2020HC Kerala03 Apr 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M.

For Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

iv) of sub-section (1) of section 49shall be taken to be nil; (aa) in a case where, by virtue of holding a capital asset, being a share or any other security, within the meaning of clause (h) of section 2 of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 (42 of 1956) (hereafter in this clause referred to as the financial

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. REENA JOSE

ITA/47/2020HC Kerala03 Apr 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M.

For Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

iv) of sub-section (1) of section 49shall be taken to be nil; (aa) in a case where, by virtue of holding a capital asset, being a share or any other security, within the meaning of clause (h) of section 2 of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 (42 of 1956) (hereafter in this clause referred to as the financial

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, vs. GRACY BABU,

ITA/48/2020HC Kerala03 Apr 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M.

For Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

iv) of sub-section (1) of section 49shall be taken to be nil; (aa) in a case where, by virtue of holding a capital asset, being a share or any other security, within the meaning of clause (h) of section 2 of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 (42 of 1956) (hereafter in this clause referred to as the financial

K.M. FATHIMA, vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

ITA/76/2018HC Kerala11 Mar 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

IV/ 2011-12 dt.31.03.2016 ITA 427/C/2016 dt.23.04.2018 53/2018 2.1 The assessee is the wife of one K A Rauf and a partner in M/s. Nilambur Traders and Director of K A Latex (P) Ltd, Vazhakkad. On 05.11.2009, a search of the assessee’s husband K A Rauf's residence and his associates were carried out under ITA Nos.67/2018, 74/2018, 66/2018

K.M. FATHIMA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/53/2018HC Kerala11 Mar 2022

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

IV/ 2011-12 dt.31.03.2016 ITA 427/C/2016 dt.23.04.2018 53/2018 2.1 The assessee is the wife of one K A Rauf and a partner in M/s. Nilambur Traders and Director of K A Latex (P) Ltd, Vazhakkad. On 05.11.2009, a search of the assessee’s husband K A Rauf's residence and his associates were carried out under ITA Nos.67/2018, 74/2018, 66/2018